Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Melanoma and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

  • Melanoma (RJ Sullivan, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Oncology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Prognosis of patients with advanced melanoma is dismal with a median overall survival of about 8 months and 5-year overall survival from a diagnosis of metastatic disease of roughly 10%. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors have brought indispensable benefits to melanoma patients. Here we will review the recent clinical efficacy and adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors for melanoma patients.

Recent Findings

The immune checkpoint inhibitors increase confirmed objective response and prolong progression-free and overall survival of the afflicted patients in association with maintaining their quality of life. Although diverse immune-related adverse events occur, most of them are manageable by appropriate immunomodulating agents. Clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors continues even after discontinuation of drugs.

Summary

Compared with conventional therapeutic options, the immune checkpoint inhibitors appear to prolong the survival of patients with advanced melanoma. Further clinical trials are warranted to determine whether their combinatory use with other treatment options may augment benefits or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Ernst DS, Petrella T, Joshua AM, Hamou A, Thabane M, Vantyghem S, et al. Burden of illness for metastatic melanoma in Canada, 2011-2013. Curr Oncol. 2016;23(6):e563–e70. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gwadry-Sridhar F, Nikan S, Hamou A, Seung SJ, Petrella T, Joshua AM, et al. Resource utilization and costs of managing patients with advanced melanoma: a Canadian population-based study. Curr Oncol. 2017;24(3):168–75. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Szczepaniak Sloane RA, Gopalakrishnan V, Reddy SM, Zhang X, Reuben A, Wargo JA. Interaction of molecular alterations with immune response in melanoma. Cancer. 2017;123(S11):2130–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30681.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization, International Agency on Cancer Research (iarc). GLOBOCAN 2008: Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide in 2008 [Web resource]. Lyon, France: iarc: 2008. [Current version (2012) available online at: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx; cited 5 Mar 2016].

  5. Garbe C, Eigentler TK, Keilholz U, Hauschild A, Kirkwood JM. Systematic review of medical treatment in melanoma: current status and future prospects. Oncologist. 2011;16(1):5–24. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Farnetani F, Scope A, Coco V, Guida S, Cesinaro AM, Piana S, et al. Paradigmatic cases of pigmented lesions: how to not miss melanoma. J Dermatol. 2016;43(12):1433–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamamura K, Otsuka A, Kaku Y, Seidel JA, Nomura M, Nagai H, et al. Dermoscopic changes in malignant melanoma after successful treatment with nivolumab: a case report. J Dermatol. 2017;44(5):547–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Woltsche N, Schmid-Zalaudek K, Deinlein T, Rammel K, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Zalaudek I. Abundance of the benign melanocytic universe: dermoscopic-histopathological correlation in nevi. J Dermatol. 2017;44(5):499–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sakai H, Ando Y, Ikinaga K, Tanaka M. Estimating melanin location in the pigmented skin lesions by hue-saturation-lightness color space values of dermoscopic images. J Dermatol. 2017;44(5):490–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13725.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Russo T, Piccolo V, Ferrara G, Agozzino M, Alfano R, Longo C, et al. Dermoscopy pathology correlation in melanoma. J Dermatol. 2017;44(5):507–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Floristán Muruzábal U, Gamo Villegas R, Pampín Franco A, Pinedo Moraleda F, Pérez Fernández E, López-Estebaranz JL. Combined in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy and digital dermoscopy for follow up of patients at high risk of malignant melanoma: a prospective case series study. J Dermatol. 2017;44(6):681–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Asahara M, Hoashi T, Shirakawa N, Matano Y, Funasaka Y, Saeki H. Case of nodular melanoma on the upper eyelid dermoscopically mimicking pigmented basal cell carcinoma. J Dermatol. 2017;44(5):543–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wada M, Ito T, Tsuji G, Nakahara T, Hagihara A, Furue M, et al. Acral lentiginous melanoma versus other melanoma: a single-center analysis in Japan. J Dermatol. 2017;44(8):932–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13834.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoashi T, Funasaka Y, Shirakawa N, Matano Y, Ansai SI, Saeki H. Case of subungual malignant melanoma showing the subtle clinical features and unexpected typical histopathological findings of melanoma in situ. J Dermatol. 2016;43(11):1361–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shoushtari AN, Munhoz RR, Kuk D, Ott PA, Johnson DB, Tsai KK, et al. The efficacy of anti-PD-1 agents in acral and mucosal melanoma. Cancer. 2016;122(21):3354–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Furue M, Kadono T. Melanoma therapy: check the checkpoints. J Dermatol. 2016;43(2):121–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Achkar T, Tarhini AA. The use of immunotherapy in the treatment of melanoma. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-017-0458-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamazaki N, Uhara H, Wada H, Matsuda K, Yamamoto K, Shimamoto T, et al. Phase I study of pegylated interferon-alpha-2b as an adjuvant therapy in Japanese patients with malignant melanoma. J Dermatol. 2016;43(10):1146–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rivas-Tolosa N, Ortiz-Brugués A, Toledo-Pastrana T, Baradad M, Traves V, Soriano V, et al. Local cryosurgery and imiquimod: a successful combination for the treatment of locoregional cutaneous metastasis of melanoma: a case series. J Dermatol. 2016;43(5):553–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shain AH, Yeh I, Kovalyshyn I, Sriharan A, Talevich E, Gagnon A, et al. The genetic evolution of melanoma from precursor lesions. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(20):1926–36. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1502583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tokuzumi A, Fukushima S, Miyashita A, Nakahara S, Kubo Y, Yamashita J, et al. Cell division cycle-associated protein 1 as a new melanoma-associated antigen. J Dermatol. 2016;43(12):1399–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Umemura H, Yamasaki O, Kaji T, Otsuka M, Asagoe K, Takata M, et al. Usefulness of serum 5-S-cysteinyl-dopa as a biomarker for predicting prognosis and detecting relapse in patients with advanced stage malignant melanoma. J Dermatol. 2017;44(4):449–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mori M, Funakoshi T, Kameyama K, Kawakami Y, Sato E, Nakayama E, et al. Lack of XAGE-1b and NY-ESO-1 in metastatic lymph nodes may predict the potential survival of stage III melanoma patients. J Dermatol. 2017;44(6):671–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13730.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fukumoto T, Sakaguchi M, Oka M, Nishimura M, Mukohara T, Nishigori C. Malignant melanoma with bone marrow involvement diagnosed from hypercalcemia: development of a neural cell adhesion molecule stain. J Dermatol. 2017;44(5):e105–e6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13718.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Volpe VO, Klufas DM, Hegde U, Grant-Kels JM. The new paradigm of systemic therapies for metastatic melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77(2):356–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.04.1126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Furudate S, Fujimura T, Kambayashi Y, Hidaka T, Sato Y, Tanita K, et al. Keratoacanthoma, palmoplantar keratoderma developing in an advanced melanoma patient treated with vemurafenib regressed by blockade of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase signaling. J Dermatol. 2017;44(9):e226–e7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13898.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Long GV, Weber JS, Infante JR, Kim KB, Daud A, Gonzalez R, et al. Overall survival and durable responses in patients with BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma receiving dabrafenib combined with trametinib. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(8):871–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.62.9345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leal L, Agut-Busquet E, Romani J, Sabat M, Yebenes M, Saez A, et al. Cutaneous granulomatous panniculitis and sarcoidal granulomatous papular eruption in a patient with metastatic melanoma treated with a BRAF inhibitor. J Dermatol. 2016;43(6):715–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM. Immune checkpoint blockade: a common denominator approach to cancer therapy. Cancer Cell. 2015;27(4):450–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Walker LSK. PD-1 and CTLA4: two checkpoints, one pathway? Sci Immunol. 2017;2(11):eaan3864. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.aan3864.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Blank C, Brown I, Peterson AC, Spiotto M, Iwai Y, Honjo T, et al. PD-L1/B7H-1 inhibits the effector phase of tumor rejection by T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic CD8+ T cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64(3):1140–5. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oba J, Nakahara T, Abe T, Hagihara A, Moroi Y, Furue M. Expression of programmed death receptor ligand 1 in melanoma may indicate tumor progression and poor patient survival. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(5):954–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2014.01.880.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Daud AI, Wolchok JD, Robert C, Hwu WJ, Weber JS, Ribas A, et al. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression and response to the anti-programmed death 1 antibody pembrolizumab in melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(34):4102–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.2477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kraft S, Fernandez-Figueras MT, Richarz NA, Flaherty KT, Hoang MP. PDL1 expression in desmoplastic melanoma is associated with tumor aggressiveness and progression. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77(3):534–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.05.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. • Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(1):23–34. This report shows that combinatory nivolumab and ipilimumab treatment prolongs the patient survival than monotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504030.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Postow MA, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, Robert C, Grossmann K, McDermott D, et al. Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):2006–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414428.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. • Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Rutkowski P, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, et al. Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(14):1345–56. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1709684. This report shows that combinatory nivolumab and ipilimumab treatment prolongs the patient survival than monotherapy.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. • Hodi FS, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, Robert C, Grossmann KF, McDermott DF, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: 2-year overall survival outcomes in a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(11):1558–68. This report shows that nivolumab prolongs the patient survival more than ipilimumab. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30366-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. • Schachter J, Ribas A, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006). Lancet. 2017;390(10105):1853–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31601-X. This report shows that pembrolizumab prolongs the patient survival more than ipilimumab.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2521–32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1503093.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ribas A, Puzanov I, Dummer R, Schadendorf D, Hamid O, Robert C, et al. Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(8):908–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00083-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, Gogas HJ, Arance AM, Cowey CL, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(19):1824–35. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1709030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Larkin J, Minor D, D'Angelo S, Neyns B, Smylie M, Miller WH Jr, et al. Overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma who received nivolumab versus investigator’s choice chemotherapy in CheckMate 037: a randomized, controlled, open-label phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017:JCO2016718023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.71.8023.

  44. Weber JS, D'Angelo SP, Minor D, Hodi FS, Gutzmer R, Neyns B, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(4):375–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70076-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, Mortier L, et al. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(4):320–30. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1412082.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ascierto PA, Del Vecchio M, Robert C, Mackiewicz A, Chiarion-Sileni V, Arance A, et al. Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg versus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(5):611–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30231-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Eggermont AM, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob JJ, Dummer R, Wolchok JD, Schmidt H, et al. Prolonged survival in stage III melanoma with ipilimumab adjuvant therapy. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1845–55. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1611299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Robert C, Thomas L, Bondarenko I, O'Day S, Weber J, Garbe C, et al. Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2517–26. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1104621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hodi FS, O'Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):711–23. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1003466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Maio M, Grob JJ, Aamdal S, Bondarenko I, Robert C, Thomas L, et al. Five-year survival rates for treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab plus dacarbazine in a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(10):1191–6. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.56.6018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Long GV, Atkinson V, Ascierto PA, Robert C, Hassel JC, Rutkowski P, et al. Effect of nivolumab on health-related quality of life in patients with treatment-naïve advanced melanoma: results from the phase III CheckMate 066 study. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(10):1940–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Schadendorf D, Dummer R, Hauschild A, Robert C, Hamid O, Daud A, et al. Health-related quality of life in the randomised KEYNOTE-002 study of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with ipilimumab-refractory melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2016;67:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. De Velasco G, Je Y, Bossé D, Awad MM, Ott PA, Moreira RB, et al. Comprehensive meta-analysis of key immune-related adverse events from CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Res. 2017;5(4):312–8. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0237.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Heinzerling L, Ott PA, Hodi FS, Husain AN, Tajmir-Riahi A, Tawbi H, et al. Cardiotoxicity associated with CTLA4 and PD1 blocking immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2016;4(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-016-0152-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Nakamura Y, Tanaka R, Asami Y, Teramoto Y, Imamura T, Sato S, et al. Correlation between vitiligo occurrence and clinical benefit in advanced melanoma patients treated with nivolumab: a multi-institutional retrospective study. J Dermatol. 2017;44(2):117–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Arai T, Harada K, Usui Y, Irisawa R, Tsuboi R. Case of acute anterior uveitis and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome-like eruptions induced by nivolumab in a melanoma patient. J Dermatol. 2017;44(8):975–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Fujimura T, Kambayashi Y, Furudate S, Kakizaki A, Hidaka T, Haga T, et al. Isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency possibly caused by nivolumab in a metastatic melanoma patient. J Dermatol. 2017;44(3):e13–e4. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Tanaka A, Ikinaga K, Kiyohara E, Tanemura A, Wataya-Kaneda M, Fujimura R, et al. Critical renal adverse event induced by nivolumab therapy in a stage IV melanoma patient. J Dermatol. 2017;44(6):727–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Teramoto Y, Nakamura Y, Asami Y, Imamura T, Takahira S, Nemoto M, et al. Case of type 1 diabetes associated with less-dose nivolumab therapy in a melanoma patient. J Dermatol. 2017;44(5):605–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wada N, Uchi H, Furue M. Case of remitting seronegative symmetrical synovitis with pitting edema (RS3PE) syndrome induced by nivolumab in a patient with advanced malignant melanoma. J Dermatol. 2017;44(8):e196–e7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13840.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Weber JS, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD, Topalian SL, Schadendorf D, Larkin J, et al. Safety profile of nivolumab monotherapy: a pooled analysis of patients with advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(7):785–92. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.66.1389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Schadendorf D, Wolchok JD, Hodi FS, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Rutkowski P, et al. Efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma who discontinued treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab because of adverse events: a pooled analysis of randomized phase II and III trials. J Clin Oncol. 2017:JCO2017732289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.73.2289.

  63. Fujimura T, Furudate S, Kakizaki A, Kambayashi Y, Haga T, Hashimoto A, et al. Contact immunotherapy enhances the therapeutic effects of nivolumab in treating in-transit melanoma: two cases reports. J Dermatol. 2016;43(6):686–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Fujimura T, Kambayashi Y, Furudate S, Hidaka T, Sato Y, Tanita K, et al. Successful treatment of multiple in-transit melanomas on the leg with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors: report of two cases. J Dermatol. 2017;44(5):592–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masutaka Furue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Masutaka Furue, Takamichi Ito, Naoko Wada, Maiko Wada, Takafumi Kadono, and Hiroshi Uchi declare they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Melanoma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Furue, M., Ito, T., Wada, N. et al. Melanoma and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Curr Oncol Rep 20, 29 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-018-0676-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-018-0676-z

Keywords

Navigation