Abstract
Most medical therapies for epilepsy consist of daily (or multiple-daily) dose, fixed-schedule, pharmacologic oral agents. Despite adherence, many patients continue to experience seizures. Various products have been discovered, designed, and marketed to serve as seizure-abortant therapies. These agents can be administered rapidly, as a “rescue” therapy, once a clinical seizure or cluster of seizures starts. Rescue medications are given as needed in an attempt to disrupt progression of a given seizure, and forestall what would otherwise be a more prolonged or more severe clinical event. Seizure-abortants also serve to aid in the management of seizure emergencies, such as prolonged, repetitive seizures, or status epilepticus. These compounds are not appropriate for all patients. Nevertheless, they do provide therapeutic benefit to several groups of patients: 1) those who perceive the onset of their seizures and have time to perform a self-intervention, 2) patients’ caregivers who administer the therapy when they witness the onset of an ictal event, and 3) patients who are in the midst of an out-of-the-hospital seizure emergency (a seizure cluster or status epilepticus). In this article we will review currently available and future rescue therapies for seizures: US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved and FDA nonapproved drugs, nonpharmacologic behavioral treatments, the vagus nerve stimulator and the NeuroPace RNS® System (Mountain View, CA).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Dreifuss FE, Rosman NP, Cloyd JC, et al. A comparison of rectal diazepam gel and placebo for acute repetitive seizures. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(26):1869–75.
Johannessen S, Patsalos P, Tomson T, et al. In: Engel J, Pedley T, editors. In epilepsy: a comprehensive textbook. Second Editionth ed. Philadelphia: Lippinocott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 1171–83.
Friedman D, French JA. Effects of intermittent levetiracetam dosing in a patient with refractory daily seizures. Neurology. 2006;66(4):590–1.
Wolf P. The role of nonpharmaceutic conservative interventions in the treatment and secondary prevention of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2002;43 Suppl 9:2–5.
Zanchetti A, Wang SC, Moruzzi G. The effect of vagal afferent stimulation on the EEG pattern of the cat. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1952;4(3):357–61.
Blum B, Magens J, Bental E, Liban E. Electroencephalographic studies in cats with experimentally produced hippocampal epilepsy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1961;13:340–53.
Chase MH, Sterman MB, Clemente CD. Cortical and subcortical patterns of response to afferent vagal stimulation. Exp Neurol. 1966;16(1):36–49.
O’Brien JH, Pimpaneau A, Albe-Fessard D. Evoked cortical responses to vagal, laryngeal and facial afferents in monkeys under chloralose anaesthesia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1971;31(1):7–20.
Puizillout JJ, Foutz AS. Characteristics of the experimental reflex sleep induced by vago-aortic nerve stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1977;42(4):552–63.
Zabara J: Peripheral control of hypersynchronous discharge in epilepsy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985;61:SupplS162.
McHugh JC, Singh HW, Phillips J, et al. Outcome measurement after vagal nerve stimulation therapy: proposal of a new classification. Epilepsia. 2007;48:375–8.
Major P, Thiele EA. Vagus nerve stimulation for intractable epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis complex. Epilepsy Behav. 2008;13:357–60.
Cyberonics, Inc.: Epilepsy Physician’s Manual. http://www.vnstherapy.com/epilepsy/hcp/manuals/default.aspx. Accessed: September 25, 2008.
Boon P, Vonck K, Van Walleghem P, et al. Programmed and magnet-induced vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;18:402–7.
•• McMullan J, Sasson C, Pancioli A, Silbergleit R: Midazolam versus diazepam for the treatment of status epilepticus in children and young adults: a meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;17(6):575–82. Six studies with 774 subjects were included. For seizure cessation, midazolam, by any route, was superior to diazepam, by any route; non-IV midazolam was as effective as IV diazepam; and buccal midazolam was superior to rectal diazepam in achieving seizure control. This is the best available article comparing midazolam to diazepam as rescue therapies.
Scott RC, Besag FM, Neville BG. Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet. 1999;353(9153):623–6.
Scheepers M, Scheepers B, Clough P. Midazolam via the intranasal route: an effective rescue medication for severe epilepsy in adults with learning disability. Seizure. 1998;7(6):509–12.
Scheepers M, Scheepers B, Clarke M, et al. Is intranasal midazolam an effective rescue medication in adolescents and adults with severe epilepsy? Seizure. 2000;9(6):417–22.
• Holsti M, Dudley N, Schunk J, et al.: Intranasal midazolam vs. rectal diazepam for the home treatment of acute seizures in pediatric patients with epilepsy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Aug;164(8):747–53. A total of 92 caretakers gave intranasal midazolam and rectal diazepam during a child’s seizure. There was no detectable difference in efficacy between the study medications as a rescue medication for terminating seizures at home in pediatric patients with epilepsy. This article is important because it highlights the ease of use of midazolam.
• de Haan GJ, van der Geest P, Doelman G, et al.: A comparison of midazolam nasal spray and diazepam rectal solution for the residential treatment of seizure exacerbations. Epilepsia. 2010 Mar;51(3):478–82. Epub 2009 Oct 8. In 21 adult patients with medically refractory epilepsy, no difference was demonstrated in efficacy or time to effect between intranasal midazolam and rectal diazepam gel and the majority of patients and caregivers preferred the nasal spray over the rectal formulation. This article also demonstrates the benefits of midazolam in terms of ease of use and patient satisfaction.
ClinicalTrials.gov: Intranasal Midazolam Versus Rectal Diazepam for Treatment of Seizures. Available at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00326612?term=intranasal+midazolam&rank=1. Accessed April 7, 2011.
Troester MM, Hastriter EV, Ng YT: Dissolving oral clonazepam wafers in the acute treatment of prolonged seizures. J Child Neurol. 2010 Dec;25(12):1468–72. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
Sakata O, Onishi H, Machida Y. Clonazepam oral droplets for the treatment of acute epileptic seizures. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2008;34(12):1376–80.
Rowland AG, Gill AM, Stewart AB, et al. Review of the efficacy of rectal paraldehyde in the management of acute and prolonged tonic-clonic convulsions. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(9):720–3.
Wolf P: Acute administration of benzodiazepines as part of treatment strategies for epilepsy. CNS Neuroscience and Therapeutics. 2010;00:1=7.
Anderson CT, Davis K, Baltuch G: An update on brain stimulation for epilepsy. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. July, 2009.
Disclosure
Conflicts of interest: V.S. Poukas: none; J.R. Pollard: has served as a consultant for H. Lundbeck A/S and for GlaxoSmithKline; C.T. Anderson: has served as a consultant to NeuroPace.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poukas, V.S., Pollard, J.R. & Anderson, C.T. Rescue Therapies for Seizures. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 11, 418–422 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-011-0207-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-011-0207-x