Skip to main content
Log in

Aphasia and right hemisphere syndromes in stroke

  • Published:
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article highlights the latest findings regarding the effect of acute and chronic stroke on behavior, specifically left hemispheric injury causing aphasia and right hemispheric injury causing neglect, visual-spatial problems, and other cognitive syndromes. We review papers published in the past 2 years pertaining to localization, assessment, recovery, treatment, and outcomes of aphasia and right hemisphere cognitive syndromes following stroke.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Dobkin BH: Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med 2005, 352:1677–1684. An excellent review of stroke rehabilitation, including current therapeutic modalities, an algorithm for rehabilitation placement poststroke, and the author’s clinical recommendations.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al.: Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann Neurol 1995, 38:659–666.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. American Heart Association: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics — 2005 Update. http://www.americanheart.org/downloadable/ heart/1105390918119HDSStats2005Update.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2005.

  4. Mohr JP, Lazar RM, Marshall RS, et al.: Middle cerebral artery disease. In Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management, edn 4. Edited by Mohr JP, Choi DW, Grotta JC, Wolf PA. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2004:154–159.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hillis AE, Work M, Breese EL, et al.: Re-examining the brain regions crucial for orchestrating speech articulation. Brain 2004, 127:1479–1487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hillis AE, Chang S, Breese E: The crucial role of posterior frontal regions in modality specific components of the spelling process. Neurocase 2004, 10:157–187.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hillis AE, Newhart M, Heidler J, Marsh EB, et al.: The neglected role of the right hemisphere in spatial representation of words for reading. Aphasiology 2005, 19:225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hillis AE, Newhart M, Heidler, et al.: The roles of the "visual word form area" in reading. NeuroImage 2005, 24:548–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nadeau S, Crosson B: Subcortical aphasia. Brain Lang 1997, 58:355–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hillis AE, Barker PB, Wityk RJ, et al.: Variability in subcortical aphasia is due to variable sites of cortical hypoperfusion. Brain Lang 2004, 89:524–530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Croquelois A, Wintermark M, Reichhart M, et al.: Aphasia in hyperacute stroke: language follows brain penumbra dynamics. Ann Neurol 2003, 54:321–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mort DJ, Malhotra P, Mannan SK, et al.: Using SPM normalization for lesion analysis in spatial neglect. Brain 2004, 127:E11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karnath HO, Berger MF, Zopf R, et al.: Using SPM normalization for lesion analysis in spatial neglect. Brain 2004, 127:E10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hillis AE, Newhart M, Heidler J, et al.: Anatomy of spatial attention: insights from perfusion imaging and hemispatial neglect in acute stroke. J Neurol Sci 2005, 25:3161–3167. This paper unifies several conflicting theories of hemispatial neglect and is important reading for those who seek to understand neglect localization and allocentric versus egocentric neglect.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Breese EL, Hillis AE: Auditory comprehension: is multiple choice really good enough? Brain Lang 2004, 89:3–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fink JN, Selim MH, Kumar S, et al.: Is the association of national institutes of health stroke scale scores and acute magnetic resonance imaging stroke volume equal for patients with right and left hemisphere stroke? Stroke 2002, 33:954–958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hillis AE, Wityk RJ, Barker PB, et al.: Change in perfusion in acute nondominant hemisphere stroke may be better estimated by tests of hemispatial neglects than by the national institutes of health stroke scale. Stroke 2003, 34:2392–2398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reineck LA, Agarwal S, Hillis AE: Diffusion-clinical mismatch is associated with potential for early recovery of aphasia. Neurology 2005, 64:828–833.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, et al.: Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000, 81:1596–1615.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Doesborgh SJ, van de Sandt-Koenderman PJ, Dippel DW, et al.: Effects of semantic treatment on verbal communication and linguistic processing in aphasia after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2004, 35:141–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M: Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke 2003, 34:987–993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shisler RJ, Baylis GC, Frank EM: Pharmacologic approaches to treatment and prevention of aphasia. Aphasiology 2000, 14:1163–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Small SL: A biological model of aphasia rehabilitation:pharmacological perspectives. Aphasiology 2004, 18:473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hillis AE: For a theory of rehabilitation: progress in the decade of the brain. In Effectiveness of Rehabilitation of Cognitive Deficits. Edited by Halligan P, Wade D. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Berthier ML: Poststroke aphasia: epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment. Drugs Aging 2005, 22:163–182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bragoni M, Altieri M, Di Piero V: Bromocriptine and speech therapy in non-fluent chronic aphasia after stroke. Neurol Sci 2000, 21:19–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Walker-Batson D, Curtis S, Natarajan R, et al.: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the use of amphetamine in the treatment of aphasia. Stroke 2001, 32:2093–2098.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Martinsson L, Hardemark HG, Wahlgren NG: Amphetamines for improving stroke recovery: a systematic Cochrane review. Stroke 2003, 34:2766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Laska AC, von Arbin M, Kahan T, et al.: Long-term antidepressant treatment with moclobemide for aphasia in acute stroke patients: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005, 19:125–132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Berthier ML, Hinojosa J, Martin MC: Open-label study of donepezil in chronic post-stroke aphasia. Neurology 2003, 60:1218–1219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Martin PI, Naeser MA, Theoret H, et al.: Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a complementary treatment for aphasia. Sem Speech Lang 2004, 25:181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mansur CG, Fregni F, Boggio PS, et al.: A sham stimulationcontrolled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology 2005, 64:1802–1804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, et al.: Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 1998, 395:166–169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Morris AP, Kritikos A, Berberovic N, et al.: Prism adaptation and spatial attention: a study of visual search innormals and patients with unilateral neglect. Cortex 2004, 40:703–721.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dijkerman HC, Webeling M, ter Wal JM, et al.: A long-lasting improvement of somatosensory function after prism adaptation, a case study. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1697–1702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Girardi M, McIntosh RD, Michel C, et al.: Sensorimotor effects on central space representation: prism adaptation influences haptic and visual representations in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1477–1487.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Angeli V, Benassi MG, Ladavas E: Recovery of oculo-motor bias in neglect patients after prism adaptation. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1223–1234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Angeli V, Meneghello F, Mattioli F, et al.: Mechanisms underlying visuo-spatial amelioration of neglect after prism adaptation. Cortex 2004, 40:155–156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rossetti Y, Jacquin-Courtois S, Rode G, et al.: Does action make the link between number and space representation? Visuomanual adaptation improves number bisection in unilateral neglect. Psychol Sci 2004, 15:426–430.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Berberovic N, Pisella L, Morris AP, et al.: Prismatic adaptation reduces biased temporal order judgements in spatial neglect. Neuroreport 2004, 15:1199–1204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dijkerman HC, McIntosh RD, Milner AD, et al.: Ocular scanning and perceptual size distortion in hemispatial neglect: effects of prism adaptation and sequential stimulus presentation. Exp Brain Res 2003, 153:220–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Maravita A, McNeil J, Malhotra P, et al.: Prism adaptation can improve contralesional tactile perception in neglect. Neurology 2003, 60:1829–1831.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ferber S, Danckert J, Joanisse M, et al.: Eye movements tell only half the story. Neurology 2003, 60:1826–1829.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Beversdorf D, Heilman KM: Prism adaptation treatment of neglect: conflicting results? Neurology 2003, 60:1734–1735.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Berberovic N, Mattingley JB: Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgements of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:493–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Frassinetti F, Angeli V, Meneghello F, et al.: Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. Brain 2002, 125:608–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Redding GM, Wallace B: Prism adaptation and unilateral neglect: Review and analysis. Neuropsychologia 2005, In press. This paper reviews studies of prism adaptation and provides evidence supporting a hypothesis regarding the mechanisms underlying improvement of neglect after prism adaptation.

  48. Castiello U, Lusher D, Burton BA, et al.: Improving left hemispatial neglect using virtual reality. Neurology 2004, 62:1958–1962.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Malhotra P, Parton A, Husain M: Noradrenergic modulation of space exploration in visual neglect. Ann Neurol 2005, In press.

  50. Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS: Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004, 17:35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Heiss W, Karbe H, Weber-Luxenburger, et al.: Speech induced cerebral metabolic activation reflects recovery from aphasia. J Neurol Sci 1997, 145:213–217.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Peck KK, Moore AM, Crosson BA, et al.: Functional magnetic resonance imaging before and after aphasia therapy. Stroke 2004, 35:554–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Vandenbulke M, Peeters R, Van Hecke P, Vandenberghe R: Anterior temporal laterality in primary progressive aphasia shifts to the right. Ann Neurol 2005, In press.

  54. Gillen R, Tennen H, McKee T: Unilateral spatial neglect: relation to rehabilitation outcomes in patients with right hemisphere stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 86:763–767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jordan, L.C., Hillis, A.E. Aphasia and right hemisphere syndromes in stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 5, 458–464 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-005-0034-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-005-0034-z

Keywords

Navigation