Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Continuous electroencephalographic monitoring in neurocritical care

  • Published:
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reviews current and future applications of continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) to monitor brain function and physiology in the neurologic intensive care unit. In comatose patients, cEEG may provide otherwise unobtainable information and influence therapeutic management, and also help determine the prognosis of patients with acute brain injury. This technique is best used for the detection of subclinical seizures, which may frequently occur during or after treatment of convulsive status epilepticus and after many types of acute brain injury, particularly trauma. The other main application of cEEG is as a primary monitor of brain function. cEEG can detect focal cerebral ischemia, such as that caused by vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage, as well as global ischemia related to intracranial pressure elevation and insufficient cerebral perfusion pressure. Other potential applications include prognostication in coma and titration of continuous infusion sedative therapy. New technologic developments include continuous digital video EEG, automated seizure-detection software, and user-friendly online quantitative EEG analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Rose J, Valtonen S, Jennett B: Avoidable factors contributing to death after head injury. BMJ 1977, 2:615–618.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews PJ, Piper IR, Dearden NM, Miller JD: Secondary insults during intrahospital transport of head-injured patients. Lancet 1990, 335:327–330.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vespa PM, Nenov V, Nuwer MR: Continuous EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit: early findings and clinical efficacy. J Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 16:1–13. Current review of clinical applications of continuous electroencephalographic monitoring.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Legatt AD, Ebersole JS: Options for long-term monitoring. In Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook. Edited by Engel J, Pedley TA. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:1002–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scheuer ML: Portable remote wireless EEG review using a cellular CDMA network [abstract]. Epilepsia 2001, 42:27–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lopes da Silva F: EEG analysis: theory and practice. In Electroencephalography. Edited by Niedermayer E, Lopes da Silva F. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1999:1135–1163.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jordan KG: Nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) detected by continuous EEG monitoring in the neuro ICU [abstract]. Neurology 1992, 42:180.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Towne AR, Waterhouse EJ, Boggs JG, et al.: Prevalence of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in comatose patients. Neurology 2000, 54:340–345. Reveals frequency of nonconvulsive seizures in patients with acute brain injury.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Privitera M, Hoffman M, Moore JL, Jester D: EEG detection of nontonic-clonic status epilepticus in patients with altered consciousness. Epilepsy Res 1994, 18:155–166.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vespa PM, Nuwer MR, Nenov V, et al.: Increased incidence and impact of nonconvulsive and convulsive seizures after traumatic brain injury as detected by continuous electroencephalographic monitoring. J Neurosurg 1999, 91:750–760. Demonstrates frequency and impact on outcome of nonconvulsive and convulsive seizures after head injury.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vespa PM, Nuwer MR, O’Phelan KH, et al.: Nonconvulsive seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage: influence of seizures on delayed neurological deterioration. Stroke 2002, 33:343.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Choi H, Claassen J, Mayer SA, Hirsh LJ: Continuous EEG monitoring of patients with intracranial hemorrhage [abstract]. Epilepsia 2002, in press.

  13. Waterhouse EJ, Garnett LK, Towne AR, et al.: Prospective population-based study of intermittent and continuous convulsive status epilepticus in Richmond, Virginia. Epilepsia 1999, 40:752–758.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Young GB, Jordan KG, Doig GS: An assessment of nonconvulsive seizures in the intensive care unit using continuous EEG monitoring: an investigation of variables associated with mortality. Neurology 1996, 47:83–89.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Claassen J, Hirsch LJ, Mayer SA: Critical care management of refractory status epilepticus. In Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Berlin: Springer; 2002:754–764.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lowenstein DH, Alldredge BK: Status epilepticus at an urban public hospital in the 1980s. Neurology 1993, 43:483–488.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Towne AR, Pellock JM, Ko D, DeLorenzo RJ: Determinants of mortality in status epilepticus. Epilepsia 1994, 35:27–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Logroscino G, Hesdorffer DC, Cascino G, Annegers JF, Hauser WA: Short-term mortality after a first episode of status epilepticus. Epilepsia 1997, 38:1344–1349.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Claassen J, Lokin J, Fitzsimmons BF, Mendehlson F, Mayer SA: Predictors of functional disability and mortality after status epilepticus. Neurology 2002, 58:139–142.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stecker MM, Kramer TH, Raps EC, et al.: Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with propofol: clinical and pharmacokinetic findings. Epilepsia 1998, 39:18–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Claassen J, Hirsch LJ, Emerson RG, Mayer SA: Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with pentobarbital, propofol, or midazolam: a systematic review. Epilepsia 2002, 43:146–153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Prasad A, Worrall BB, Bertram EH, Bleck TP: Propofol and midazolam in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. Epilepsia 2001, 42:380–386.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. DeLorenzo RJ, Waterhouse EJ, Towne AR, et al.: Persistent nonconvulsive status epilepticus after the control of convulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsia 1998, 39:833–840.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Claassen J, Hirsch LJ, Emerson RG, et al.: Continuous EEG monitoring and midazolam infusion for refractory status epilepticus. Neurology 2001, 57:1036–1042. Study revealing high frequency of nonconvulsive seizures during and after treatment of refractory status epilepticus.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cascino GD, Pandian JD: Digital video-EEG monitoring in the neurological intensive care unit: clinical features and neurological outcome in patients with seizures [abstract]. Neurology 2002, 58:336–337.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jordan KG: Continuous EEG monitoring in the neuroscience intensive care unit and emergency department. J Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 16:14–39. Current review of clinical applications of continuous electroencephalographic monitoring.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Astrup J, Siesjo BK, Symon L: Thresholds in cerebral ischemia—the ischemic penumbra. Stroke 1981, 12:723–725.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cohn HR, Raines RG, Mulder DW, Neumann MH: Cerebral vascular lesions: electroencephalographic and neuropathologic correlations. Arch Neurol 1948, 60:163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nagata K, Tagawa K, Hiroi S, Shishido F, Uemura K: Electroencephalographic correlates of blood flow and oxygen metabolism provided by positron emission tomography in patients with cerebral infarction. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989, 72:16–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tolonen U, Sulg IA: Comparison of quantitative EEG parameters from four different analysis techniques in evaluation of relationships between EEG and CBF in brain infarction. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1981, 51:177–185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ingvar DH, Sjolund B, Ardo A: Correlation between dominant EEG frequency, cerebral oxygen uptake and blood flow. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1976, 41:268–276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sundt TM Jr, Sharbrough FW, Piepgras DG, et al.: Correlation of cerebral blood flow and electroencephalographic changes during carotid endarterectomy: with results of surgery and hemodynamics of cerebral ischemia. Mayo Clin Proc 1981, 56:533–543.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Blume WT, Sharbrough CR: EEG monitoring during carotid endarterectomy and open heart surgery. In Electroencephalography. Edited by Niedermayer E, Lopes da Silva F. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1999:797–808.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zampella E, Morawetz RB, McDowell HA, et al.: The importance of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy. Neurosurgery 1991, 29:727–730.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharbrough FW, Messick JM Jr, Sundt TM Jr: Correlation of continuous electroencephalograms with cerebral blood flow measurements during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 1973, 4:674–683.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Vespa PM, Nuwer MR, Juhasz C, et al.: Early detection of vasospasm after acute subarachnoid hemorrhage using continuous EEG ICU monitoring. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997, 103:607–615.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Labar DR, Fisch BJ, Pedley TA, Fink ME, Solomon RA: Quantitative EEG monitoring for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991, 78:325–332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Claassen J, Hirsch LJ, Kreiter KT, et al.: Quantitative continuous EEG analysis for the detection of delayed cerebral ischemia in patients with poor grade subarachnoid hemorrhage [abstract]. Epilepsia 2002, in press.

  39. Adams DC, Heyer EJ, Emerson RG, et al.: The reliability of quantitative electroencephalography as an indicator of cerebral ischemia. Anesth Analg 1995, 81:80–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bricolo A, Turazzi S, Faccioli F, et al.: Clinical application of compressed spectral array in long-term EEG monitoring of comatose patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978, 45:211–225.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Synek VM: EEG abnormality grades and subdivisions of prognostic importance in traumatic and anoxic coma in adults. Clin Electroencephalogr 1988, 19:160–166.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Young GB, McLachlan RS, Kreeft JH, Demelo JD: An electroencephalographic classification for coma. Can J Neurol Sci 1997, 24:320–325.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hirsch LJ, Claassen J, Mayer SA, Emerson RG: Systematic design of a prognostic scale for ICU patients with highly epileptiform EEG’s [abstract]. Epilepsia 2001, 42:256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kassell NF, Hitchon PW, Gerk MK, Sokoll MD, Hill TR: Alterations in cerebral blood flow, oxygen metabolism, and electrical activity produced by high dose sodium thiopental. Neurosurgery 1980, 7:598–603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Schwartz ML, Tator CH, Rowed DW, et al.: The University of Toronto head injury treatment study: a prospective, randomized comparison of pentobarbital and mannitol. Can J Neurol Sci 1984, 11:434–440.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Si Y, Gotman J, Pasupathy A, et al.: An expert system for EEG monitoring in the pediatric intensive care unit. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998, 106:488–500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Agarwal R, Gotman J, Flanagan D, Rosenblatt B: Automatic EEG analysis during long-term monitoring in the ICU. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998, 107:44–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Young GB, Campbell VC: EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit: pitfalls and caveats. J Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 16:40–45. Reviews artifacts often encountered during continuous electroencephalographic monitoring.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hirsch LJ, Claassen J, Emerson RG: Beware the SRPIDs: stimulus-responsive pseudo-ictal discharges are a common and important EEG pattern in critically ill patients [abstract]. Epilepsia 2002, in press.

  50. Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Dawson NV, et al.: The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. JAMA 1996, 276:889–897.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Critical Care Neurology, Columbia University, Neurological Institute, 710 West 168th Street, Box NI-1, 10032, New York, NY, USA

    Jan Claassen MD & Stephan A. Mayer MD

Authors
  1. Jan Claassen MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephan A. Mayer MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Claassen, J., Mayer, S.A. Continuous electroencephalographic monitoring in neurocritical care. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2, 534–540 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-002-0042-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-002-0042-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation