Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Epidemiology of sepsis: Recent advances

  • Published:
Current Infectious Disease Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sepsis, as defined by an expert consensus definition, is the development of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome in the presence of infection. Using this clinically applicable definition, several studies have evaluated the epidemiology of sepsis over the past decade. The current incidence of sepsis is at least 240 patients per 100,000 people in the United States population, whereas for severe sepsis it is between 51 and 95 patients per 100,000 people. The incidence rate for sepsis has been increasing over the past two decades, driving an increase in the number of deaths despite a decline in case-fatality rates. Sepsis is the tenth leading cause of death in the United States and accounts for more than 17 billion dollars in direct healthcare expenditures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al.: Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 1992, 101:1644–1655. The original sepsis definition is described in this landmark paper.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. BoneRC: Toward an epidemiology and natural history of SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome). JAMA 1992, 268:3452–3455.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, et al.: Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2001, 344:699–709. This paper highlights the first pharmacologic treatment study for sepsis to show a significant benefit.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Warren BL, Eid A, Singer P, et al.: High-dose antithrombin III in severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001, 286:1869–1878.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Abraham E, Reinhart K, Opal S, et al.: Efficacy and safety of tifacogin (recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor) in severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003, 290:238–247.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rangel-Frausto MS, Pittet D, Costigan M, et al.: The Natural History of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS): A Prospective Study. JAMA 1995, 273:117–123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brun-Buisson C, Doyon F, Carlet J, et al.: Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults. A multicenter prospective study in intensive care units. JAMA 1995, 274:968–974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sands KE, Bates DW, Lanken PN, et al.: Epidemiology of sepsis syndrome in 8 academic medical centers. JAMA 1997, 278:234–240.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Angus DC, Wax R: Epidemiology of sepsis: an update. Crit Care Med 2001, 29:S109-S116.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Center for Disease Control: Increase in national hospital discharge survey rates for septicemia: United States, 1979–1987. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1990, 39:31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, et al.: Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med 2001, 29:1303–1310. This paper was the first to estimate the national cost of severe sepsis.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eaton S, Burnham E, Martin GS, Moss M: The ICD-9 code for septicemia maintains a high positive predictive value for clinical sepsis [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002, 165:A471.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M: The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:1546–1554. This paper covers a longitudinal study of sepsis in the United States that highlights several important trends in the epidemiology of sepsis, including racial and gender disparities.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sundararajan V, Macisaac CM, Presneill JJ, et al.: Epidemiology of sepsis in Victoria, Australia. Crit Care Med 2005, 33:71–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Padkin A, Goldfrad C, Brady A, et al.: Epidemiology of severe sepsis occurring in the first 24 h in intensive care units in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Crit Care Med 2003, 31:2332–2338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Finfer S, Bellomo R, Lipman J, et al.: Adult-population incidence of severe sepsis in Australia and New Zealand intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30:589–596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brun-Buisson C, Meshaka P, Pinton P, Vallet B: EPISEPSIS: a reappraisal of the epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30:580–588.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Annane D, Aegerter P, Jars-Guincestre MC, Guidet B: Current epidemiology of septic shock: the CUB-Rea Network. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 168:165–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhan C, Miller MR: Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization. JAMA 2003, 290:1868–1874.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Annane D, Sebille V, Charpentier C, et al.: Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock. JAMA 2002, 288:862–871.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bernard GR, Wheeler AP, Russell JA, et al.: The effects of ibuprofen on the physiology and survival of patients with sepsis. N Engl J Med 1997, 336:912–918.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Alberti C, Brun-Buisson C, Burchardi H, et al.: Epidemiology of sepsis and infection in ICU patients from an international multicentre cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2002, 28:108–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Moss M: The effect of cancer on risks and outcomes in sepsis [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 167:A549.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Williams MD, Braun LA, Cooper LM, et al.: Hospitalized cancer patients with severe sepsis: analysis of incidence, mortality, and associated costs of care. Crit Care 2004, 8:R291-R298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Moss M: Effect of age on the development and outcome with sepsis [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 167:A837.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Danai, P., Martin, G.S. Epidemiology of sepsis: Recent advances. Curr Infect Dis Rep 7, 329–334 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-005-0005-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-005-0005-1

Keywords

Navigation