Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Blood pressure variability: Its measurement and significance in hypertension

  • Published:
Current Hypertension Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) fluctuations over time physiologically result from the complex interaction between environmental stimulation, genetic factors, and cardiovascular control mechanisms. Ambulatory BPmonitoring techniques, in particular systems providing beat-by-beat BP recording, have allowed a detailed description of the different components contributing to overall BP variability (BPV) over 24 hours, including short-lasting and more sustained BP changes. In hypertension, BPV increases with increasing BP levels, and evidence is available that its magnitude correlates closely with target-organ damage and with the incidence of cardiovascular events, independent of absolute BP levels. It has been suggested that drugs capable of providing smooth 24-hour BP control, reducing BPV, may confer additional target-organ protection. Mathematic indices, such as the trough-to-peak ratio and the smoothness index, represent useful measures of the homogeneity of the antihypertensive effect over 24 hours. Further studies are still needed to confirm that, in humans, interventions that can reduce BPV can also reduce the rate of cardiovascular events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Mancia G, Parati G: The role of blood pressure variability in end-organ damage. J Hypertens 2003, 21(Suppl6):S17-S23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bevan AT, Honour AJ, Stott FH: Direct arterial pressure recording in unrestricted man. Clin Sci 1969, 36:329–344.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mancia G, Ferrari A, Gregorini L, et al.: Blood pressure and heart rate variabilities in normotensive and hypertensive human beings. Circ Res 1983, 53:96–104 Study demonstrating the occurrence of a pronounced BPV in ambulant normotensive and hypertensive subjects assessed intra-arterially for 24 hours by the means of the Oxford method. This variability was found to correlate with BP levels over a wide range of values.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mancia G, Di Rienzo M, Parati G: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring use in hypertension research and clinical practice. Hypertension 1993, 21:510–524.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Rienzo M, Grassi G, Pedotti A, et al.: Continuous vs intermittent blood pressure measurements in estimating 24-hour average blood pressure. Hypertension 1983, 5:264–269.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Imholz BPM, Langewouters GJ, Van Montfrans GA, et al.: Feasibility of A, 24-hour-continuous, finger arterial pressure recording. Hypertension 1993, 21:65–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mancia G, Parati G, Di Rienzo M, Zanchetti A: BP variability. In Handbook of Hypertension: Pathophysiology of Hypertension, vol. 17. Edited by Zanchetti A, Mancia G. Philadelphia: Elsevier Science; 1997:117–169.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parati G: Blood pressure variability: its measurement and significance in hypertension. J Hypertens 2005, 23(Suppl 1):S19-S25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg AD, Raftery EB, Green HL: The Oxford continuous blood pressure recorder. Postgrad Med J 1976, 52(Suppl 7):104–109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sander D, Kukla C, Klingelhofer J, et al.: Relationship between circadian blood pressure patterns and progression of early carotid atherosclerosis: a 3-year follow up study. Circulation 2000, 102:1536–1541. Prospective study showing that daytime SBP variability is a strong predictor of carotid artery wall thickness, a marker of early atherosclerosis progression independent from established cardiovascular risk factors. Daytime SBP variability was also a determinant of the risk for cardiovascular events.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kikuya M, Hozawa A, Ohokubo T, et al.: Prognostic significance of blood pressure and heart rate variabilities: the Osahama study. Hypertension 2000, 36:901–906.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Palatini P, Penzo M, Racioppa A, et al.: Clinical relevance of nighttime blood pressure and of daytime blood pressure variability. Arch Intern Med 1992, 152:1855–1860.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Parati G, Pomidossi G, Albini F, et al.: Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension. J Hypertens 1987, 5:93–98. Study demonstrating that the severity of target-organ damage brought about by hypertension correlates with 24-hour mean BP. Additionally, at any given 24-hour mean BP, severity of targetorgan damage exhibits an independent correlation with BPV.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Frattola A, Parati G, Cuspidi C, et al.: Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure variability. J Hypertens 1993, 11:1133–1137. Longitudinal study providing the first demonstration that targetorgan damage and cardiovascular complications secondary to hypertension depend not only on BP levels but also on BP variability.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Vliet B, Hu L, Scott T, et al.: Cardiac hypertrophy and telemetered blood pressure after baroreceptor denervation in normotensive rats. Am J Physiol 1996, 271:R1759-R1769.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lacolley P, Bezie Y, Girerd X, et al.: Aortic distensibility and structural changes in sino-aortic denervated rats. Hypertension 1995, 26:337–340.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lacolley P, Glaser E, Challande P, et al.: Structural changes and in situ aortic pressure-diameter relationship in longterm chemical-sympathectomized rats. Am J Physiol 1995, 269:H407-H416.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sasaki S, Yoneda Y, Fujita H, et al.: Association of blood pressure variability with induction of atherosclerosis in cholesterol-fed rats. Am J Hypertens 1994, 7:453–459.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Miao C-Y, Su D-F: The importance of blood pressure variability in rat aortic and left ventricular hypertrophy produced by sino-aortic denervation. J Hypertens 2002, 20:1865–1872.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mancia G, Parati G, Hennig M, et al.: Relation between blood pressure variability and carotid artery damage in hypertension: baseline data from the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA). J Hypertens 2001, 19:1981–1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sega R, Corrao G, Bombelli M, et al.: Blood pressure variability and organ damage in a general population: results from the PAMELA study (Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni). Hypertension 2002, 39:710–714.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pickering TG, James GD: Ambulatory blood pressure and prognosis. J Hypertens 1994, 12(Suppl 1):S29-S33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Verdecchia P, Borgioni C, Ciucci A, et al.: Prognostic significance of blood pressure variability in essential hypertension. Blood Press Monit 1996, 1:3–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu JG, Xu LP, Chu ZX, et al.: Contribution of blood pressure variability to the effect of nitrendipine on end-organ damage in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens 2003, 21:1961–1967.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kario K, Pickering TG, Umeda Y, et al.: Morning surge in blood pressure as a predictor of silent and clinical cerebrovascular disease in elderly hypertensives: a prospective study. Circulation 2003, 107:1401–1406. Longitudinal study first demonstrating, in more than 500 older hypertensives, that an excessive morning BP surge by ABPM predicts subsequent stroke events independent of ABP levels and target-organ damage.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor CR, Hodge EM, White DA: Circadian rhythm of angina: similarity to circadian rhythms of myocardial infarction, ischemic ST segment depression, and sudden cardiac death. The Amlodipine Angina Study Group. Am Heart J 1989, 118:1098–1099.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pringle E, Phillips C, Thijs L, et al.: On behalf of the Syst-Eur investigators. Systolic blood pressure variability as a risk factor for stroke and cardiovascular mortality in the elderly hypertensive population. J Hypertens 2003, 21:2251–2257.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Willich SN, Levy D, Rocco MB, et al.: Circadian variation in the incidence of sudden cardiac death in the Framingham Heart Study population. Am J Cardiol 1987, 60:801–806.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Redon J, Roca-Cusachs A, Mora-Macia J: Uncontrolled early morning blood pressure in medicated patients: the ACAMPA study. Analysis of the control of blood pressure using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Blood Press Monit 2002, 7:111–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lacourcière Y, Lenis J, Orchard R, et al.: A comparison of the efficacy and duration of action of the angiotensin II receptor blocker telmisartan to amlodipine. Blood Press Monit 1998, 3:295–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. White WB, Lacourciére Y, Davidai G: Effects of the angiotensin II receptor blockers telmisartan versus valsartan on the circadian variation of blood pressure. Impact on the early morning period. Am J Hypertens 2004, 17:347–353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lipicky RJ: Trough:peak ratio: the rationale behind the United States Food and Drug Administration recommendations. J Hypertens 1994, 12(Suppl 8):S17-S19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Meredith PA, Elliott HL: FDA guidelines on trough:peak ratios in the evaluation of antihypertensive agents. United States Food and Drug Administration. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994, 23(Suppl 5):S26-S30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Parati G, Omboni S, Rizzoni D, et al.: The smoothness index: a new, reproducible and clinically relevant measure of the homogeneity of the blood pressure reduction with treatment for hypertension. J Hypertens 1998, 16:1685–1691. Study demonstrating that the smoothness index is superior to the trough:peak ratio in assessing the homogeneity of the 24-hour BP reduction induced by antihypertensive treatment. Additionally, these data demonstrate that the smoothness index is more reproducible than the trough:peak ratio and that it better correlates with the effects of antihypertensive treatment on LVH.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Istituto Scientifico Ospedale, S. Luca, via Spagnoletto 3, 20149, Milan, Italy

    Gianfranco Parati MD

Authors
  1. Gianfranco Parati MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Faini MSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mariaconsuelo Valentini MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianfranco Parati MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parati, G., Faini, A. & Valentini, M. Blood pressure variability: Its measurement and significance in hypertension. Current Science Inc 8, 199–204 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-006-0051-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-006-0051-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation