Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Admixture mapping as a gene discovery approach for complex human traits and diseases

  • Published:
Current Hypertension Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Admixture mapping (AM) is a special form of conventional meiotic or recombination mapping for disease gene discovery in humans that exploits naturally occurring genetic and phenotypic differences existing in populations between which recent gene flow has occurred. Essentially, mates from two different "parental" populations with different allelic and disease-predisposing mutation profiles will produce "admixed" offspring whose genomes will be mixtures of the genomes associated with the parental populations. Strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) will exist for several generations between neighboring loci of admixed individuals and can be exploited for identifying the genomic location of trait-influencing loci. Although it may be a very clever strategy for identifying genes that influence human traits and diseases, AM can be problematic. We review the foundations, basic strategies, resources, and settings necessary for AM. We conclude that AM has potential in the identification of disease-predisposing loci, but this potential may only exist in a limited number of realistic settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Lander ES, Schork NJ: Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 1994, 265:2037–2048.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schork N, Chakravarti A: A nonmathematical overview of modern gene mapping techniques applied to human diseases. In Molecular Genetics and Gene Therapy of Cardiovascular Disease. Edited by Mockrin S. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996:79–109.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Collins FS, Drumm ML, Cole JL, et al.: Construction of a general human chromosome jumping library, with application to cystic fibrosis. Science 1987, 235:1046–1049.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Altmuller J, Palmer LJ, Fischer G, et al.: Genomewide scans of complex human diseases: true linkage is hard to find. Am J Hum Genet 2001, 69:936–950.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. de la Chapelle A, Wright FA: Linkage disequilibrium mapping in isolated populations: the example of Finland revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:12416–12423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cardon LR, Abecasis GR: Using haplotype blocks to map human complex trait loci. Trends Genet 2003, 19:135–140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Halder I, Shriver MD: Measuring and using admixture to study the genetics of complex disease. Hum Genomics 2003, 1:52–62. This recent paper from Shriver’s group is an extensive and excellent review of admixture studies. It addresses methodologic issues, practical applications, and future directions.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. RifeDC: Populations of hybrid origin as source material for the detection of linkage. Am J Hum Genet 1954, 6:26–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chakraborty R, Weiss KM: Admixture as a tool for finding linked genes and detecting that difference from allelic association between loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988, 85:9119–9123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stephens JC, Briscoe D, O’Brien SJ: Mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium in human populations: limits and guidelines. Am J Hum Genet 1994, 55:809–824.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McKeiguePM: Mapping genes underlying ethnic differences in disease risk by linkage disequilibrium in recently admixed populations. Am J Hum Genet 1997, 60:188–196.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McKeiguePM: Mapping genes that underlie ethnic differences in disease risk: methods for detecting linkage in admixed populations, by conditioning on parental admixture. Am J Hum Genet 1998, 63:241–251.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shriver MD, Smith MW, Jin L, et al.: Ethnic-affiliation estimation by use of population-specific DNA markers. Am J Hum Genet 1997, 60:957–964.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan NL, Martin ER, Morris RW, Weir BS: Marker selection for the transmission/disequilibrium test, in recently admixed populations. Am J Hum Genet 1998, 62:703–712.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Parra EJ, Marcina A, Akey J, et al.: Estimating African American admixture proportions by use of population-specific alleles. Am J Hum Genet 1998, 63:1839–1851.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng C, Elston RC: Multipoint linkage disequilibrium mapping with particular reference to the African-American population. Genet Epidemiol 1999, 17:79–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lautenberger JA, Stephens JC, O’Brien SJ, Smith MW: Significant admixture linkage disequilibrium across 30 cM around the FY locus in African Americans. Am J Hum Genet 2000, 66:969–978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McKeigue PM, Carpenter JR, Parra EJ, Shriver MD: Estimation of admixture and detection of linkage in admixed populations by a Bayesian approach: application to African-American populations. Ann Hum Genet 2000, 64(Pt2):171–186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. SansM: Admixture studies in Latin America: from the 20th to the 21st century. Hum Biol 2000, 72:155–177.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Williams RC, Long JC, Hanson RL, et al.: Individual estimates of European genetic admixture associated with lower bodymass index, plasma glucose, and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Pima Indians. Am J Hum Genet 2000, 66:527–538.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Parra EJ, Kittles RA, Argyropoulos G, et al.: Ancestral proportions and admixture dynamics in geographically defined African Americans living in South Carolina. Am J Phys Anthropol 2001, 114:18–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pfaff CL, Parra EJ, Bonilla C, et al.: Population structure in admixed populations: effect of admixture dynamics on the pattern of linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 2001, 68:198–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith MW, Lautenberger JA, Shin HD: Markers for mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium in African American and Hispanic populations. Am J Hum Genet 2001, 69:1080–1094.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Collins-Schramm HE, Kittles RA, Operario DJ, et al.: Markers that discriminate between European and African ancestry show limited variation within Africa. Hum Genet 2002, 111:566–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Collins-Schramm HE, Phillips CM, Operario DJ, et al.: Ethnicdifference markers for use in mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 2002, 70:737–750.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pfaff CL, Kittles RA, Shriver MD: Adjusting for population structure in admixed populations. Genet Epidemiol 2002, 22:196–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bonilla C, Parra EJ, Pfaff CL, et al.: Admixture in the Hispanics of the San Luis Valley, Colorado, and its implications for complex trait gene mapping. Ann Hum Genet 2004, 68(Pt 2):139–153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bonilla C, Shriver MD, Parra EJ, et al.: Ancestral proportions and their association with skin pigmentation and bone mineral density in Puerto Rican women from New York city. Hum Genet 2004, 115:57–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Collins-Schramm HE, Chima B, Operario DJ, et al.: Markers informative for ancestry demonstrate consistent megabaselength linkage disequilibrium in the African American population. Hum Genet 2003, 113:211–219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Collins-Schramm HE, Chima B, Morii T, et al.: Mexican American ancestry-informative markers: examination of population structure and marker characteristics in European Americans, Mexican Americans, Amerindians and Asians. Hum Genet 2004, 114:263–271. This study provides support for the practical application of admixture mapping in the Mexican American population.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fernandez JR, Shriver MD, Beasley TM, et al.: Association of African genetic admixture with resting metabolic rate and obesity among women. Obes Res 2003, 11:904–911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gower BA, Fernandez JR, Beasley TM, et al.: Using genetic admixture to explain racial differences in insulin-related phenotypes. Diabetes 2003, 52:1047–1051.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hoggart CJ, Parra EJ, Shriver MD, et al.: Control of confounding of genetic associations in stratified populations. Am J Hum Genet 2003, 72:1492–1504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoggart CJ, Shriver MD, Kittles RA, et al.: Design and analysis of admixture mapping studies. Am J Hum Genet 2004, 74:965–978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee WC, Yen YC: Admixture mapping using interval transmission/disequilibrium tests. Ann Hum Genet 2003, 67(Pt 6):580–588.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Oksenberg JR, Barcellos LF, Cree BA, et al.: Mapping multiple sclerosis susceptibility to the HLA-DR locus in African Americans. Am J Hum Genet 2004, 74:160–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Patterson N, Hattagadi N, Lane B, et al.: Methods for highdensity admixture mapping of disease genes. Am J Hum Genet 2004, 74:979–1000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pfaff CL, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Wagner JK, Long JC: Information on ancestry from genetic markers. Genet Epidemiol 2004, 26:305–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rosenberg NA, Li LM, Ward R, Pritchard JK: Informativeness of genetic markers for inference of ancestry. Am J Hum Genet 2003, 73:1402–1422. Inference of individual ancestry is crucial to AM studies. A powerful measure is introduced for determining the amount of information that multi-allelic markers provide concerning individual ancestry.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Seldin MF, Morii T, Collins-Schramm HE, et al.: Putative ancestral origins of chromosomal segments in individual African Americans: implications for admixture mapping. Genome Res 2004, 14:1076–1084.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Shriver MD, Parra EJ, Dios S, et al.: Skin pigmentation, biogeographical ancestry and admixture mapping. Hum Genet 2003, 112:387–399. One of the first studies showing how estimates of individual ancestry proportions can be applied to identify genotypes that influence traits that differ between populations.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Smith MW, Patterson N, Lautenberger JA, et al.: A high-density admixture map for disease gene discovery in African Americans. Am J Hum Genet 2004, 74:1001–1013. This study reports the most extensive panel of genetic markers available to date, including more than 3000 SNPs informative for AM studies in the African American population.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. WangJ: Maximum-likelihood estimation of admixture proportions from genetic data. Genetics 2003, 164:747–765.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhu X, Cooper RS, Elston RC: Linkage analysis of a complex disease through use of admixed populations. Am J Hum Genet 2004, 74:1136–1153. A sophisticated and improved statistical method for AM is introduced, and power calculations over a range of realistic settings are presented in this study.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. ChakrabortyR: Gene admixture in human populations: Models and predictions. Yearbook Phys Anthropol 1986, 29:1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. LongJC: The genetic structure of admixed populations. Genetics 1991, 127:417–428.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Cooper RS, Kaufman JS, Ward R: Race and genomics. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:1166–1170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Roseberg NA, Donnelly P: Association mapping in structured populations. Am J Hum Genet 2000, 67:170–181.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Reich DE, Goldstein DB: Detecting association in a case-control study while correcting for population stratification. Genet Epidemiol 2001, 20:4–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Dean M, Stephens SJ, Winkler C, et al.: Polymorphic admixture typing in human ethnic populations. Am J Hum Genet 1994, 55:788–808.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Polymorphism Research Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of California at San Diego, 2050 Basic Science Building, 9500 Gilman Drive, 92093-0603, La Jolla, CA, USA

    Caroline M. Nievergelt PhD & Nicholas J. Schork PhD

Authors
  1. Caroline M. Nievergelt PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicholas J. Schork PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nievergelt, C.M., Schork, N.J. Admixture mapping as a gene discovery approach for complex human traits and diseases. Current Science Inc 7, 31–37 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-005-0052-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-005-0052-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation