Skip to main content
Log in

ERCP in the Management of Choledocholithiasis in Pregnancy

  • Biliary Tract (J Baillie, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The physiological changes of pregnancy increase the risk of gallstone formation, and choledocholithiaisis is the most common indication for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during pregnancy. ERCP has been performed during pregnancy for over 20 years. Despite the apparent efficacy and lack of adverse fetal outcomes in published case series and reports, there remains a concern for the use of fluoroscopy during pregnancy. Recent focus has centered around avoidance of the use of fluoroscopy during ERCP, including the use of alternative techniques to confirm biliary cannulation and ductal clearance. The benefits of these techniques over traditional ERCP technique are unclear. In this article, we will review the epidemiology of gallstone disease during pregnancy, outline the risks of ERCP during pregnancy, and describe recent novel techniques in endoscopic biliary intervention for biliary drainage and ductal clearance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Maringhini A, Ciambra M, Baccelliere P, et al. Biliary sludge and gallstones in pregnancy: incidence, risk factors, and natural history. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:116–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mendez-Sanchez N, Chavez-Tapia NC, Uribe M. Pregnancy and gallbladder disease. Ann Hepatol. 2006;5:227–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kern Jr F, Everson GT, DeMark B, et al. Biliary lipids, bile acids, and gallbladder function in the human female. Effects of pregnancy and the ovulatory cycle. J Clin Invest. 1981;68:1229–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramin KD, Ramsey PS. Disease of the gallbladder and pancreas in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2001;28:571–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McKay AJ, O'Neill J, Imrie CW. Pancreatitis, pregnancy and gallstones. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87:47–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Swisher SG, Hunt KK, Schmit PJ, Hiyama DT, Bennion RS, Thompson JE. Management of pancreatitis complicating pregnancy. Am Surg. 1994;60:759–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. • Tang SJ, Mayo MJ, Rodriguez-Frias E, et al. Safety and utility of ERCP during pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:453–61. One of the largest published series of ERCPs in pregnancy. Use of standard ERCP techniques in all cases.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dixon NP, Faddis DM, Silberman H. Aggressive management of cholecystitis during pregnancy. Am J Surg. 1987;154:292–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Menees S, Elta G. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2006;16:41–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pearlman M. Prenatal risks from diagnostic radiations. In: Pearlman MD, Tintinalli J, editors. Emergency Care of the Woman. Columbus: McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing; 2002. p. 717–28.

    Google Scholar 

  11. • Samara ET, Stratakis J, Enele Melono JM, Mouzas IA, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J. Therapeutic ERCP and pregnancy: is the radiation risk for the conceptus trivial? Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:824–31. Scientific model of the theoretical risks of fluoroscopy to fetus.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahaleh M, Hartwell GD, Arseneau KO, et al. Safety and efficacy of ERCP in pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:287–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Axelrad AM, Fleischer DE, Strack LL, Benjamin SB, al-Kawas FH. Performance of ERCP for symptomatic choledocholithiasis during pregnancy: techniques to increase safety and improve patient management. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:109–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tham TC, Vandervoort J, Wong RC, et al. Safety of ERCP during pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:308–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cappell MS. The fetal safety and clinical efficacy of gastrointestinal endoscopy during pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2003;32:123–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rothman KJ, Fyler DC, Goldblatt A, Kreidberg MB. Exogenous hormones and other drug exposures of children with congenital heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;109:433–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ornoy A, Arnon J, Shechtman S, Moerman L, Lukashova I. Is benzodiazepine use during pregnancy really teratogenic? Reprod Toxicol. 1998;12:511–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Czeizel A. Lack of evidence of teratogenicity of benzodiazepine drugs in Hungary. Reprod Toxicol. 1987;1:183–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goodlin RC. Naloxone and its possible relationship to fetal endorphin levels and fetal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;139:16–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Baillie J, Cairns SR, Putman WS, Cotton PB. Endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;171:1–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Farca A, Aguilar ME, Rodriguez G, de la Mora G, Arango L. Biliary stents as temporary treatment for choledocholithiasis in pregnant patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;46:99–101.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Garcia-Cano J, Perez-Miranda M, Perez-Roldan F, et al. ERCP during pregnancy. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2012;104:53–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krishnan A, Ramakrishnan R, Venkataraman J. Endoscopic intervention for symptomatic choledocholithiasis in pregnancy. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011;35:772–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. •• Cappell MS. Risks versus benefits of gastrointestinal endoscopy during pregnancy. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8:610–34. A comprehensive review of endoscopy in pregnancy with pooled data of published case series to date.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wertelecki W. Malformations in a chornobyl-impacted region. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e836–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hall EJ. Scientific view of low-level radiation risks. Radiographics. 1991;11:509–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. De Santis M, Di Gianantonio E, Straface G, et al. Ionizing radiations in pregnancy and teratogenesis: a review of literature. Reprod Toxicol. 2005;20:323–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shelton J, Linder JD, Rivera-Alsina ME, Tarnasky PR. Commitment, confirmation, and clearance: new techniques for nonradiation ERCP during pregnancy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:364–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Akcakaya A, Ozkan OV, Okan I, Kocaman O, Sahin M. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy without radiation. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3649–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharma SS, Maharshi S. Two stage endoscopic approach for management of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2008;17:183–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology. 2004;232:635–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kirkinen P, Partanen K, Vainio P, Ryynanen M. MRI in obstetrics: a supplementary method for ultrasonography. Ann Med. 1996;28:131–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fishman DS, Tarnasky PR, Patel SN, Raijman I. Management of pancreaticobiliary disease using a new intra-ductal endoscope: the Texas experience. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:1353–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Girotra M, Jani N. Role of endoscopic ultrasound/SpyScope in diagnosis and treatment of choledocholithiasis in pregnancy. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:3601–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cappell MS, Colon VJ, Sidhom OA. A study of eight medical centers of the safety and clinical efficacy of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in 83 pregnant females with follow-up of fetal outcome with comparison control groups. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:348–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chavalitdhamrong D, Draganov PV. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:491–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pasquale L, Caserta L, Rispo A, et al. Endoscopic management of symptomatic choledocholithiasis in pregnancy without the use of radiations. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2007;11:343–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gotzberger M, Pichler M. Gulberg V. Gastrointest Endosc: Contrast-enhanced US-guided ERCP for treatment of common bile duct stones in pregnancy; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Daas AY, Agha A, Pinkas H, Mamel J, Brady PG. ERCP in pregnancy: is it safe? Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2009;5:851–5.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bani Hani MN, Bani-Hani KE, Rashdan A, AlWaqfi NR, Heis HA, Al-Manasra AR. Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy. ANZ J Surg. 2009;79:23–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chong VH, Jalihal A. Endoscopic management of biliary disorders during pregnancy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2010;9:180–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert A. Enns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, C.H.Y., Enns, R.A. ERCP in the Management of Choledocholithiasis in Pregnancy. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 14, 504–510 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-012-0294-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-012-0294-0

Keywords

Navigation