Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Minimizing complications in pancreaticobiliary endoscopy

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound are invaluable tools in the diagnostic and therapeutic evaluation and management of a variety of pancreatobiliary disorders. Along with a significant refinement in the equipment and techniques used has come a recent trend toward aggressive therapeutic interventions. Because of the technical nature of these procedures and the characteristics of the patients, postprocedural complications may occur, ranging from minor (requiring brief hospitalization) to severe (causing permanent disability or death). This review summarizes these complications and outlines strategies to minimize them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al.: Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic review of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007, 102:1781–1788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al.: Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998, 48:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al.: Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996, 335:909–918.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, et al.: Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2007, 39:793–801.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, et al.: Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:139–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al.: Risk factors for post ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 54:425–434.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes JA, et al.: Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991, 37:383–391.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, Testoni PA: Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2003, 35:830–834.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fogel EL, Eversman D, Jamidar P, et al.: Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: pancreaticobiliary sphincterotomy with pancreatic stent placement has a lower rate of pancreatitis than biliary sphincterotomy alone. Endoscopy 2002, 34:280–285.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sherman S, Rufallo TA, Hawes RH, et al.: Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts. Gastroenterology 1991, 101:1068–1075.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehta SN, Pavone E, Barkun JS, et al.: Predictors of post-ERCP complications in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy 1998, 30:457–463.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, et al.: Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 60:721–731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheon YK, Cho KB, Watkins JL, et al.: Frequency and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis correlated with extent of pancreatic ductal opacification. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 65:385–393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sherman S, Troiano FP, Hawes RH, et al.: Sphincter of Oddi manometry: decreased risk of clinical pancreatitis with use of a modified aspirating catheter. Gastrointest Endosc 1990, 36:462–466.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen S, Bacon BR, Berlin JA, et al.: National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: ERCP for diagnosis and therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56:803–809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Andriulli A, Leandro G, Niro G, et al.: Pharmacologic treatment can prevent pancreatic injury after ERCP: a metaanalysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 51:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Andriulli A, Leandro G, Federici T, et al.: Prophylactic administration of somatostatin or gabexate does not prevent pancreatitis after ERCP: an updated meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 65:624–632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Choudhary A, Bechtold M, Puli S, et al.: Gabexate for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis [abstract]. Am J Gastroenterol 2008, 103:S82.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Omata F, Tokuda Y, Takahashi M, et al.: Meta-analysis: somatostatin or its long-acting analogue, octreotide for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis [abstract]. Am J Gastroenterol 2008, 103:S90.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Elmunzer B, Waljee A, Elta G, et al.: A meta-analysis of rectal NSAIDs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gut 2008, 57:1262–1267.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdel Aziz AM, Lehman GA: Pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. World J Gastroenterol 2007, 13:2655–2668.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Verma D, Kapadia A, Adler DG: Pure versus mixed electrosurgical current for endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a meta-analysis of adverse outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 66:283–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Freeman ML: Pancreatic stents for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007, 5:1354–1365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Singh P, Das A, Isenberg G, et al.: Does prophylactic pancreatic stent placement reduce the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 60:544–550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tarnasky PR, Palesch YY, Cunningham JT, et al.: Pancreatic stenting prevents pancreatitis after biliary sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastroenterology 1998, 115:1518–1524.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel R, Tarnasky PR, Hennessy WS, et al.: Does stenting after pancreatic sphincterotomy reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with prior biliary sphincterotomy? Preliminary results of a prospective, randomized trial [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1999, 49:AB80.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Saad AM, Fogel EL, McHenry L, et al.: Pancreatic duct stent placement prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction but normal manometry results. Gastrointest Endosc 2008, 67:255–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sherman S, Hawes R, Earle D, et al.: Does leaving a main pancreatic duct stent in place reduce the incidence of precut biliary sphincterotomy (ES)-induced pancreatitis? A final analysis of a randomized prospective study [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1996, 43:413.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Aizawa T, Ueno N: Stent placement in the pancreatic duct prevents pancreatitis after endoscopic sphincter dilation for removal of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 54:209–213.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Norton ID, Gostout CJ, Baron TH, et al.: Safety and outcome of endoscopic snare excision of the major duodenal papilla. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56:239–243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheng CL, Sherman S, Fogel EL, et al.: Endoscopic snare papillectomy for tumors of the duodenal papillae. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 60:757–764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Harewood GC, Pochron NL, Gostout CJ: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for endoscopic snare excision of the duodenal ampulla. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:367–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Smithline A, Silverman W, Rogers D, et al.: Effect of prophylactic main pancreatic duct stenting on the incidence of biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis in high-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1993, 39:652–657.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fazel A, Quadri A, Catalano MF, et al.: Does a pancreatic duct stent prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 2003, 57:291–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Freeman ML, Overby C, Qi D: Pancreatic stent insertion: consequences of failure and results of a modified technique to maximize success. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:8–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rashdan A, Fogel EL, McHenry L Jr, et al.: Improved stent characteristics for prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004, 2:322–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Howard TJ, Tan T, Lehman GA, et al.: Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery 1999, 126:658–663.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fatima J, Baron TH, Topazian M, et al.: Pancreaticobiliary and duodenal perforations after periampullary endoscopic procedures: diagnosis and management. Arch Surg 2007, 142:448–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Freeman ML: Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56:S273–S282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hoffman ML, Farrell MT, Yee YS: Risk of bleeding after endoscopic biopsy or polypectomy in patients taking aspirin or other NSAIDs. Gastrointest Endosc 1994, 40:458–462.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fogel EL, Alazmi W, Schmidt S, et al.: Clinical utility of peri-operative hemostatic screening tests (PHSTs) in patients undergoing outpatient ERCP [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:300A.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Banerjee S, Shen B, Baron TH, et al.; ASGE Standards of Practice Committee: Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008, 67:791–798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Harris A, Chan AC, Torres-Viera C, et al.: Meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopy 1999, 31:718–724.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Draganov P, Pan JJ, Forsmark C: Prospective evaluation of adverse reactions to iodine-containing contrast media after ERCP [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2008, 67:AB107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bournet B, Migueres I, Delacroix M, et al.: Early morbidity of endoscopic ultrasound: 13 years’ experience at a referral center. Endoscopy 2006, 38:349–354.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lachter J: Fatal complications of endoscopic ultrasonography: a look at 18 cases. Endoscopy 2007, 39:747–750.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Das A, Sivak MV Jr, Chak A: Cervical esophageal perforation during EUS: a national survey. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 53:599–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Barawi M, Gottlieb K, Cunha B, et al.: A prospective evaluation of the incidence of bacteremia associated with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 53:189–192.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Janssen J, Konig K, Knop-Hammad V, et al.: Frequency of bacteremia after linear EUS of the upper GI tract with and without FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:339–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S, et al.: Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:622–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Adler DG, Jacobson BC, Davila RE, et al.: ASGE guideline: complications of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:8–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, et al.: Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology 1997, 112:1087–1095.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lee LS, Saltzman JR, Bounds BC, et al.: EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective analysis of complications and their predictors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005, 3:231–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ryan AG, Zamvar V, Roberts SA: Iatrogenic candidal infection of a mediastinal foregut cyst following endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy 2002, 34:838–839.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Eloubeidi MA, Gress FG, Savides TJ, et al.: Acute pancreatitis after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a pooled analysis from EUS centers in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 60:385–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Al-Haddad M, Wallace MB, Woodward TA, et al.: The safety of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2008, 40:204–208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Gress F, Michael H, Gelrud D, et al.: EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas: evaluation of pancreatitis as a complication. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56:864–867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gress FG, Hawes RH, Savides TJ, et al.: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy using linear array and radial scanning endosonography. Gastrointest Endosc 1997, 45:243–250.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi MA: Frequency and significance of acute intracystic hemorrhage during EUS-FNA of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 60:631–635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Jacobson BC, Waxman I, Parmar K, et al.: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder bile aspiration in idiopathic pancreatitis carries a significant risk of bile peritonitis. Pancreatology 2002, 2:26–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Levy MJ, Wiersema MJ: EUS-guided celiac plexus neuroly sis and celiac plexus block. Gastrointest Endosc 2003, 57:923–930.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Hoffman BJ: EUS-guided celiac plexus block/neurolysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56:S26–S28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Clarian / Indiana University Digestive Diseases Center, 550 North University Boulevard, Suite 4100, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA

    Evan L. Fogel

Authors
  1. Olga Barkay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mouen Khashab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Al-Haddad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Evan L. Fogel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evan L. Fogel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barkay, O., Khashab, M., Al-Haddad, M. et al. Minimizing complications in pancreaticobiliary endoscopy. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 11, 134–141 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-009-0021-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-009-0021-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation