Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nonerosive reflux disease: A pathophysiologic perspective

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is the most common phenotype of gastroesophageal reflux disease. By definition, patients with NERD have typical reflux symptoms caused by the intraesophageal reflux of gastric contents but have no visible esophageal mucosal injury. This is in contrast to patients with reflux esophagitis, also known as erosive reflux disease, and Barrett’s esophagus, who have obvious esophageal mucosal injury on endoscopy. Only 50% of patients with NERD have pathologic esophageal acid contact time (ACT) as detected on 24-hour pH monitoring (ie, NERD-positive). NERD patients with physiologic esophageal ACT and good temporal correlation of symptoms with reflux events (symptom index > 50% or symptom-association probability > 95%) are considered to have esophageal hypersensitivity (ie, NERD-negative). Finally, patients with physiologic esophageal ACT but poor symptom-reflux correlation are now considered to have functional heartburn and not NERD. NERD-positive patients have motor dysfunction and acidic reflux abnormalities that are similar to patients with reflux esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus, whereas NERD-negative patients have minimal abnormalities that are not much different than healthy controls. The histopathologic feature most indicative of NERD is the presence of dilated intercellular spaces within squamous epithelium, an ultrastructural abnormality readily identified on transmission electron microscopy and on light microscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management—the Genval Workshop Report. Gut 1999, 44(Suppl 2):S1–S16.

  2. Fass R, Fennerty MB, Vakil N: Nonerosive reflux disease—current concepts and dilemmas. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, 96:303–314.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fass R, Ofman JJ: Gastroesophageal reflux disease—should we adopt a new conceptual framework? Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:1901–1909.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Galmiche JP, Clouse RE, Balint A, et al.: Functional esophageal disorders. Gastroenterology 2006, 130:1459–1465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fass R: Epidemiology and pathophysiology of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2003, 98(Suppl):S2–S7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Locke GR III, Talley NJ, Fett SL, et al.: Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 1997, 112:1448–1456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fass R: Erosive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease (NERD): comparison of epidemiologic, physiologic, and therapeutic characteristics. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007, 41:131–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu JC, Cheung CM, Wong VW, Sung JJ: Distinct clinical characteristics between patients with nonerosive reflux disease and those with reflux esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007, 5:690–695.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Orlando RC: Pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus. In Medical Clinics of North America. Edited by Cappell MS. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2004:219–242.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon C, Kang JY, Neild PJ, Maxwell JD: The role of the hiatus hernia in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004, 20:719–732.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sgouras SN, Mpakos D, Rodias M, et al.: Prevalence and axial length of hiatus hernia in patients with nonerosive reflux disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007, 41:814–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boeckxstaens GE: The lower esophageal sphincter. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2005, 17(Suppl 1):13–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Timmer R, Smout AJ: Gastro-oesophageal reflux of liquids and gas during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2006, 18:888–893.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Frazzoni M, De Micheli E, Savarino V: Different patterns of oesophageal acid exposure distinguish complicated reflux disease from either erosive reflux oesophagitis or non-erosive reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003, 18:1091–1098.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Frazzoni M, De Micheli E, Zentilin P, Savarino V: Pathophysiological characteristics of patients with non-erosive reflux disease differ from those of patients with functional heartburn. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004, 20:81–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Martinez SD, Malagon IB, Garewal HS, et al.: Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)—acid reflux and symptom patterns. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003, 17:537–545.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shapiro M, Green C, Faybush EM, et al.: The extent of oesophageal acid exposure overlap among the different gastro-oesophageal reflux disease groups. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006, 23:321–329.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sifrim D, Mittal R, Fass R, et al.: Acidity and volume of the refluxate in the genesis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease symptoms. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007, 25:1003–1015.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Timmer R, Smout AJ: Characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux in symptomatic patients with and without excessive esophageal acid exposure. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:2470–2475.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Conchillo JM, Schwartz MP, Selimah M, et al.: Acid and non-acid reflux patterns in patients with erosive esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD): a study using intraluminal impedance monitoring. Dig Dis Sci 2007 Oct 13 (Epub ahead of print).

  21. Dickman R, Bautista JM, Wong WM, et al.: Comparison of esophageal acid exposure distribution along the esophagus among the different gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) groups. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:2463–2469.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cicala M, Emerenziani S, Caviglia R, et al.: Intra-oesophageal distribution and perception of acid reflux in patients with non-erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003, 18:605–613.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Curvers WL, et al.: Determinants of perception of heartburn and regurgitation. Gut 2006, 55:313–318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ismail-Beigi F, Horton PF, Pope CE: Histological consequences of gastroesophageal reflux in man. Gastroenterology 1970, 58:163–174.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hopwood D, Milne G, Logan KR: Electron microscopic changes in human oesophageal epithelium in oesophagitis. J Pathol 1979, 129:161–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pope CE: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (reflux esophagitis). In Gastrointestinal Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management. Edited by Sleisenger MH, Fordtran JS. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1978:541–568.

  27. Tobey NA, Carson JL, Alkiek RA, Orlando RC: Dilated intercellular spaces: a morphological feature of acid reflux—damaged human esophageal epithelium. Gastroenterology 1996, 111:1200–1205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Isomoto H, Saenko VA, Kanazawa Y, et al.: Enhanced expression of interleukin-8 and activation of nuclear factor kappa-B in endoscopy-negative gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2003, 99:589–597.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Carney CN, Orlando RC, Powell DW, Dotson MM: Morphologic alterations in early acid-induced epithelial injury of the rabbit esophagus. Lab Invest 1981, 45:198–208.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Orlando RC, Powell DW, Carney CN: Pathophysiology of acute acid injury in rabbit esophageal epithelium. J Clin Invest 1981, 68:286–293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Orlando RC, Bryson JC, Powell DW: Mechanisms of H+ injury in rabbit esophageal epithelium. Am J Physiol 1984, 246:G718–G724.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tobey NA, Hosseini SS, Argote CM, et al.: Dilated intercellular spaces and shunt permeability in nonerosive acid-damaged esophageal epithelium. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:13–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Asaoka D, Miwa H, Hirai S, et al.: Altered localization and expression of tight-junction proteins in a rat model with chronic acid reflux esophagitis. J Gastroenterol 2005, 40:781–796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Solcia E, Villani L, Luinetti O, et al.: Altered intercellular glycoconjugates and dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in reflux disease. Virchows Arch 2000, 436:207–216.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Villanacci V, Grigolato PG, Cestari R, et al.: Dilated intercellular spaces as markers of reflux disease: histology, semiquantitative score and morphometry upon light microscopy. Digestion 2001, 64:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Calabrese C, Fabbri A, Bortolotti M, et al.: Dilated intercellular spaces as a marker of oesophageal damage: comparative results in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with or without bile reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003, 18:525–532.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Vieth M, Fiocca R, Haringsma J, et al.: Radial distribution of dilated intercellular spaces of the esophageal squamous epithelium in patients with reflux disease exhibiting discrete endoscopic lesions. Dig Dis 2004, 22:208–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Caviglia R, Ribolsi M, Maggiano N, et al.: Dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in nonerosive reflux disease patients with physiological esophageal acid exposure. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:543–548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ravelli AM, Villanacci V, Ruzzenenti N, et al.: Dilated intercellular spaces: a major morphological feature of esophagitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006, 42:510–515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Barlow WJ, Orlando RC: The pathogenesis of heartburn in nonerosive reflux disease: a unifying hypothesis. Gastroenterology 2005, 128:771–778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rodrigo J, Hernandez CJ, Vidal MA, Pedrosa JA: Vegetative innervation of the esophagus. III. Intraepithelial endings. Acta Anat (Basel) 1975, 92:242–258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Robles-Chillida EM, Rodrigo J, Mayo I, et al.: Ultrastructure of free-ending nerve fibres in oesophageal epithelium. J Anat 1981, 133:227–233.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Yu S, Undem BJ, Kollarik M: Vagal afferent nerves and nociceptive properties in guinea pig esophagus. J Physiol 2005, 563:831–842.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bielefeldt K, Davis BM: Differential effects of ASIC3 and TRPV1 deletion on gastroesophageal sensation in mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2008, 294:G130–G138.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kollarik M, Undem BJ: Mechanisms of acid-induced activation of airway afferent nerve fibres in guinea pig. J Physiol 2002, 543:591–600.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Steen KH, Reeh PW: Sustained graded pain and hyperalgesia from harmless experimental tissue acidosis in humans. Neurosci Lett 1993, 154:113–116.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Steen KH, Steen AE, Reeh PW: A dominant role of acid pH in inflammatory excitation and sensitization of nociceptors in rat skin, in vitro. J Neurosci 1995, 15:3982–3989.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Calabrese C, Bortolotti M, Fabbri A, et al.: Reversibility of GERD ultrastructural alterations and relief of symptoms after omeprazole treatment. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:537–542.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kern M, Hofmann C, Hyde J, Shaker R: Characterization of the cerebral cortical representation of heartburn in GERD patients. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2004, 286:G174–G181.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Tobey NA, Reddy SP, Keku TO, et al.: Mechanisms of HCl-induced lowering of intracellular pH in rabbit esophageal epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 1993, 105:1035–1044.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Cao W, Harnett KM, Cheng L, et al.: H(2)O(2): a mediator of esophagitis-induced damage to calcium-release mechanisms in cat lower esophageal sphincter. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2005, 288:G1170–G1178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Cheng L, Harnett KM, Cao W, et al.: Hydrogen peroxide reduces lower esophageal sphincter tone in human esophagitis. Gastroenterology 2005, 129:1675–1685.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Cheng L, Cao W, Behar J, et al.: Acid induced release of PAF by human esophageal mucosa induces inflammatory mediators in circular smooth muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006, 319:117–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Cheng L, Cao W, Fiocchi C, et al.: HCl-induced inflammatory mediators in cat esophageal mucosa and inflammatory mediators in esophageal circular muscle in an in vitro model of esophagitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006, 290:G1307–G1317.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Schlesinger PK, Donahue PE, Schmid B, Layden TJ: Limitations of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in the hospital setting. Gastroenterology 1985, 89:797–804.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Masclee AA, DeBest AC, DeGraaf R, et al.: Ambulatory 24-hour pH-metry in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1990, 25:225–230.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Castell DO, Murray JA, Tutuian R, et al.: The pathophysiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease—oesophageal manifestations. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004, 20(Suppl 9):14–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Grossi L, Ciccaglione AF, Travaglini N, Marzio L: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and gastroesophageal reflux episodes in healthy subjects and GERD patients during 24 hours. Dig Dis Sci 2001, 46:815–821.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Mittal RK, McCallum RW: Characteristics and frequency of transient relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with reflux esophagitis. Gastroenterology 1988, 95:593–599.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Iwakiri K, Hayashi Y, Kotoyori M, et al.: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are the major mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux but are not the cause of reflux disease. Dig Dis Sci 2005, 50:1072–1077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Long JD, Marten E, Tobey NA, Orlando RC: Effects of luminal hypertonicity on rabbit esophageal epithelium. Am J Physiol 1997, 273:G647–G654.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Bor S, Caymaz-Bor C, Tobey NA, et al.: Effect of ethanol on the structure and function of rabbit esophageal epithelium. Am J Physiol 1998, 274:G819–G826.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Tobey NA, Sikka D, Marten E, et al.: Effect of heat stress on rabbit esophageal epithelium. Am J Physiol 1999, 276:G1322–G1330.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Gastroenterology, Wake Forest University, School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA

    John D. Long

Authors
  1. John D. Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roy C. Orlando
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John D. Long.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Long, J.D., Orlando, R.C. Nonerosive reflux disease: A pathophysiologic perspective. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 10, 200–207 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-008-0044-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-008-0044-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation