Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The use of oral rehydration solutions in children and adults

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The observation that the intestinal Na+-glucose cotransporter remains intact in most diarrheal illnesses led to development of the life-saving, low-cost technology of oral rehydration salt (ORS) solutions. The primary therapeutic role of ORS solutions is in prevention and treatment of dehydration during management of acute gastroenteritis. Successful oral rehydration therapy involves early use of ORS with maintenance or timely resumption of regular feeding. Since the inception of the oral rehydration approach more than three decades ago, the widespread use of ORS solutions has revolutionized the management and outcomes of acute gastroenteritis in children and adults. The efficacy of the World Health Organization ORS solution and of commercial ORS formulations has been enhanced by reducing osmolarity. Newer formulations of ORS are under active investigation, with promise of added benefits, including promotion of intestinal healing. This article reviews fluid and electrolyte transport in the gastrointestinal tract, the pathophysiologic mechanisms of acute diarrhea, and the basis and formulation of current and newer ORS solutions. Guidelines for efficacious use of ORS in the management of acute gastroenteritis and short gut syndrome are also provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Hirschhorn N, Greenough WB III: Progress in oral rehydration therapy. Sci Am 1991, 264:50–56. This article gives a comprehensive must-read account of the historical and physiologic basis for the formulation and constituents of current ORS solutions. In addition, the positive worldwide impact of ORS therapy is reviewed.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Herikstad H, Yang S, Van Gilder TJ, Vugia D, et al.: A population based estimate of diarrheal illness in the United States: FoodNet, 1996–7. Epidemiol Infect 2002, 129:9–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mirza NM, Caulfield LE, Black RE, Macharia WM: Risk factors for diarrheal duration. Am J Epidemiol 1997, 146:776–785.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffman JC, Zeitz M: Small bowel disease in the elderly: diarrhea and malabsorption. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2002, 16:17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yazdanpanah Y, Beaugerie L, Boelle PY, et al.: Risk factors for acute diarrhea in summer: a nation-wide French case-control study. Epidemiol Infect 2000, 124:409–416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. King CK, Glass R, Bresee JS, Duggan C: Managing acute gastroenteritis among children. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly 2003, 52(RR16):1–16. This comprehensive report reviews the worldwide impact of diarrheal diseases on morbidity and mortality in children. The physiologic basis of current and newer ORS formulations is discussed. In addition, the importance of nutritional therapy during management of acute gastroenteritis in children is discussed. Guidelines for assessment and treatment of dehydration in children are presented.

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Wit MA, Koopmans MPG, Kortbeek LM, et al.: Sensor, a population-based cohort study on gastroenteritis in the Netherlands: incidence and etiology. Am J Epidemiol 2001, 154:666–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carabin H, Gyorkos TW, Soto JC, et al.: Effectiveness of a training program in reducing infections in toddlers attending day care centers. Epidemiology 1999, 10:219–227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McDonnell MW, Dawson DC: Pathophysiology of diarrhea. In Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology. Edited by Henderson JM. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996:71–110.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Secretory functions of the alimentary tract. In The Textbook of Medical Physiology. Edited by Guyton AC, Hall JE. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; Philadelphia; 2000:738–753.

  11. French PJJ, Bijman J, Edixhoven M, et al.: Isotope-specific activation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-chloride channels by cGMP-dependent protein kinase II. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:26626–26631.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Powell DW: Approach to the patient with diarrhea. In Textbook of Gastroenterology. Edited by Yamada T, Alpers DA, Laine L. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Christensen ML: Human viral gastroenteritis. Clin Microbiol Rev 1989, 2:51–89.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hughes JM, Murad F, Chang B, Guerrant RL: Role of cyclic GMP in the action of heat-stable enterotoxin of Escherichia. Coli. Nature 1978, 271:755–756.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Joo N, London RM, Kim HD, et al.: Regulation of intestinal Cl- and HCO3-secretion uroguanylin. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 1998, 274:G633-G644.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirshhorn N: The treatment of acute diarrhea in children: an historical and physiological perspective. Am J Clin Nutr 1980, 33:637–663. This is an excellent comprehensive review of the historical and research-based physiologic perspectives leading to the current ORS and approach of oral rehydration therapy. The author carefully reviews several studies dating back to the 1940s, 50s, and 60s that laid the foundation of our current knowledge and understanding of oral rehydration physiology.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bern C, Martines J, de Zoysa I, Glass RI: The magnitude of the global problem of diarrhoeal disease: a ten year update. Bull World Health Org 1992, 70:705–714.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramkrishna BS, Venkatraman S, Srinvasan P, et al.: Amylaseresistant starch plus oral rehydration solution for cholera. N Eng J Med, 2000, 342:308–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wingertzahn MA, Rehman KU, Altaf W, Wapnir RA: Zinc as a potential enteroprotector in oral rehydration solutions: its role in nitric oxide metabolism. Pediatr Res 2003, 53:434–439. One of two important studies examining the effect and mechanism of zinc-supplemented ORS.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Altaf W, Perveen S, Rehman KU, et al.: Zinc supplementation in oral rehydration solutions: experimental assessment and mechanisms of action. J Amer Coll Nutr 2002, 21:26–32. These two studies examine the effect and mechanism of zinc-supplemented ORS in the management of diarrhea in animal models. The beneficial effects of zinc supplementation are demonstrated. The role of zinc as scavenger of nitric oxide radicals is described, suggesting that this is the enteroprotective mechanism of zinc-supplemented ORS during colitis, malnutrition, and zinc deficiency.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Alam NH, Majumder RN, Fuchs GJ, and the CHOICE study group: Efficacy and safety of oral rehydration solution with reduced osmolarity in adults with cholera: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Lancet 1999, 354:296–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Expert Consultation of Oral Rehydration: Reduced osmolarity oral rehydration salts (ORS) formulation. http:// www.who.int/child-adolescent-health/New_Publications/ NEWS/Expert_consultation Accessed March 12, 2004. This report is derived from the UNICEF and WHO expert consultation on reduced-osmolarity ORS formulations held in July 2001. This report reviews clinical trials comparing efficacy of hypo-osmolar ORS with the standard WHO (1975) solution in children and adults with cholera and noncholera gastroenteritis. The committee recommended a new hypo-osmolar ORS and that the policy of a single WHO ORS solution be maintained.

  23. Avery ME, Snyder JD: Oral therapy for acute diarrhea: the underused simple solution. N Eng J Med 1990, 323:891–894.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. CHOICE Study Group: Multicenter, randomized, double blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a reduced osmolarity oral rehydration salts solution in children with acute watery diarrhea. Pediatrics 2001, 107:613–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dutta D, Bhattacharya MK, Deb AK, et al.: Evaluation of oral hypo-osmolar glucose-based and rice-based oral rehydration solutions in the treatment of cholera in children. Acta Pædiatr 2000, 89:787–790.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fontaine O, Gore SM, Pierce NF: Rice-based oral rehydration solution for treating diarrhea. Cochrane Database System Rev 2000, 2:CD001264.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thillainayagam AV, Hunt JB, Farthing MJG: Enhancing clinical efficacy of oral rehydration therapy: Is low osmolarity the key? Gastroenterology 1998, 114:197–210.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gore SM, Fontaine O, Pierce NF: Efficacy of rice based oral rehydration. Lancet 1996, 348:193–194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Royall D, Wolever TMS, Jeejeebhoy KN: Clinical significance of colonic fermentation. Am J Gastroenterol 1990, 85:1307–1312.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Go JT, Harper RG, Sia CG, et al.: Oral rehydration solutions: increased water and sodium absorption by addition of a viscosity-enhancing agent in a rat model of chronic osmotic diarrhea. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1994, 19:410–416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Alam NH, Meier R, Schneider H, et al.: Partially hydrolyzed guar gum-supplemented oral rehydration solution in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000, 31:503–507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. King JC, Keen CL: Zinc. In Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease, edn 9. Edited by Shils ME, Olson JA, Shike M, Ross CA. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1999:223–240.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bahl R, Bhandari N, Saksena M, et al.: Efficacy of zinc-fortified oral rehydration solution in 6- to 35-month-old children with acute diarrhea. J Pediatr 2002, 141:677–682.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. van der Hulst RRWJ, von Meyenfeldt MF, Soeters PB: Glutamine: an essential aminoacid for the gut. Nutrition 1996, 12:S78-S81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ziegler TR, Szeszycki EE, Estivariz CF, et al.: Glutamine: from basic science to clinical applications. Nutrition 1996, 12:S68-S70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Parimi PS, Devapatla S, Gruca LL, et al.: Effect of enteral glutamine or glycine on whole-body nitrogen kinetics in verylow-birth-weight infants. Am J Clin Nutr 2004, 79:402–409. Using the technique of stable isotopes, in a controlled study the investigators tracked the metabolism and fate of enterally administered glutamine and glycine on whole-body amino acid kinetics in low-birth weight infants. They demonstrated that enterally administered glutamine was entirely metabolized in the gut and did not have a detectable effect on whole-body protein and nitrogen kinetics. These findings support the candidacy of glutamine as a unique substrate in the gastrointestinal tract.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Silva AC, Santos-Neto MS, Soares AM, et al.: Efficacy of a glutamine-based oral rehydration solution on the electrolyte and water absorption in a rabbit model of secretory diarrhea induced by cholera toxin. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1998, 26:513–519.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bhan MK, Mahalanbis D, Fontaine O, Pierce NF: Clinical trials of oral rehydration salt formulations: a review. Bull World Health Org 1994, 72:945–955.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Duggan C: Glutamine-based oral rehydration solutions: the magic bullet revisited? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1998, 26:533–535.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Michel-Aranda J, Giannella RA: Acute diarrhea: a practical review. Am J Med 1999, 106:670–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Modigliani R, Bernier JI: Absorption of glucose, sodium, and water by the human jejunum studied by intestinal perfusion with a proximal occluding balloon and at variable flow rates. Gut 1971, 12:184–193.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Nappert G, Barrios JM, Zello GA, Naylor JM: Oral rehydration solution therapy in the management of children with rotovirus diarrhea. Nutr Rev 2000, 1:80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Duggan C, Lasche J, McCarty M, et al. Oral rehydration solution for acute diarrhea prevents subsequent unscheduled follow-up visits. Pediatrics 1999, 104:e29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. American Academy of Pediatrics: Oral therapy for acute diarrhea. In Pediatric Nutrition Handbook, edn 5. Edited by Kleinman RE. Washington, DC: AAP; 2004:471–4479. Recent recommendations for ORS therapy in the management of acute gastroenteritis.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Buchman AL, Scolapio J, Fryer J: AGA technical review on short bowel syndrome and intestinal transplantation. Gastroenterology 2003, 124:1111–1134.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Children’s Memorial Hospital, 2300 Children’s Plaza, 60614, Chicago, IL, USA

    Timothy A. Sentongo MD

Authors
  1. Timothy A. Sentongo MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sentongo, T.A. The use of oral rehydration solutions in children and adults. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 6, 307–313 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-004-0083-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-004-0083-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation