Skip to main content
Log in

Pancreatic function tests: When to choose, what to use

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although techniques for high-resolution imaging of the pancreas are constantly being improved, the evaluation of pancreatic function remains crucial for the workup of pancreatic diseases. More than 20 direct and indirect tests are available for the assessment of pancreatic function. Measurement of fecal elastase-1 is recommended as the most suitable test for the initial assessment of pancreatic function. Among other techniques, the pancreolauryl test, and alternatively the BT-PABA (N-benzoyl-L-tyrosyl-paminobenzoic acid) or the 13C-mixed-triglyceride test, yield the best sensitivity and specificity. Nevertheless, all indirect tests are of limited value in patients with mild to moderate impairment of pancreatic function. In these patients, the secretin-caerulein test remains the gold standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Chiray M, Jeandel Salmon A: L'exploration clinique du pancreas et l'injection intraveneuse de secretin purifiee [in French]. Presse Med 1930, 38:977–981.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Burton P, Evans DG, Harper AA, et al.: A test of pancreatic function in man based on the analysis of duodenal contents after administration of secretin and pancreozymin. Gut 1960, 1:111–117.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Adler G, Beglinger C, Braun U, et al.: Interaction of the cholinergic system and cholecystokinin in the regulation of endogenous and exogenous stimulation of pancreatic secretion in humans. Gastroenterology 1991, 100:537–543.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Malfertheiner P, Büchler M, Stanescu A, Ditschuneit H: Exocrine pancreatic function in correlation to ductal and parenchymal morphology in chronic pancreatitis. Hepatogastroenterology 1986, 33:110–114.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Malfertheiner P, Büchler M: Correlation of imaging and function in chronic pancreatitis. Radiol Clin North Am 1989, 27:51–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lankisch PG, Schmidt I: Fecal elastase 1 is not the indirect pancreatic function test we have been waiting for. Dig Dis Sci 2000, 45:166–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimagno EP, Go VL, Summerskill WH: Relations between pancreatic enzyme ouputs and malabsorption in severe pancreatic insufficiency. N Engl J Med 1973, 288:813–815.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Niederau C, Grendell JH: Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 1985, 88:1973–1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dominguez-Munoz JE, Hieronymus C, Sauerbruch T, Malfertheiner P: Fecal elastase test: evaluation of a new noninvasive pancreatic function test. Am J Gastroenterol 1995, 90:1834–1837.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Glasbrenner B, Schon A, Klatt S, et al.: Clinical evaluation of the faecal elastase test in the diagnosis and staging of chronic pancreatitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996, 8:1117–1120.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Löser C, Mollgaard A, Fölsch Ur: Faecal elastase 1: a novel, highly sensitive, and specific tubeless pancreatic function test. Gut 1996, 39:580–586.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gullo L, Ventrucci M, Tomassetti P, et al.: Fecal elastase 1 determination in chronic pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 1999, 44:210–213. Investigation of 78 patients, including 44 with different degrees of pancreatic insufficiency. The reported study directly compares the elastase-1 and chymotrypsin tests.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lankisch PG, Schmidt I, Konig H: Faecal elastase 1: not helpful in diagnosing chronic pancreatitis associated with mild to moderate exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Gut 1998, 42:551–554. Comparison of the secretin-pancreozymin test, fecal fat, chymotrypsin, and elastase in 64 patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. In contrast with other reports, fecal elastase appeared not to be superior to chymotrypsin.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cavallini G, Benini L, Brocco G, et al.: The fecal chymotrypsin photometric assay in the evaluation of exocrine pancreatic capacity: comparison with other direct and indirect pancreatic function tests. Pancreas 1989, 4:300–304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Czako L, Takacs T, Farkas G, et al.: Diagnostic value of fecal elastase test in pancreatic exocrine deficiency. Orv Hetil 1999, 140:1887–1890.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Walkowiak J, Cichy WK, Herzig KH: Comparison of fecal elastase-1 determination with the secretin-cholecystokinin test in patients with cystic fibrosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999, 34:202–207. Comparison of elastase-1 concentration with the secretin-CCK-test.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Katschinski M, Schirra J, Bross A, et al.: Duodenal secretion and fecal excretion of pancreatic elastase-1 in healthy humans and patients with chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 1997, 15:191–200. In 10 healthy subjects and 23 patients with chronic pancreatitis, the authors correlate the duodenal output of various enzymes with the fecal chymotrypsin activity and elastase-1 concentration.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stein J, Jung M, Sziegoleit A, et al.: Immunoreactive elastase I: clinical evaluation of a new noninvasive test of pancreatic function. Clin Chem 1996, 42:222–226.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cade A, Walters MP, Mcginley N, et al.: Evaluation of fecal pancreatic elastase-1 as a measure of pancreatic exocrine function in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2000, 29:172–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Phillips IJ, Rowe DI, Dewar P, Connett GI: Faecal elastase 1: a marker of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in cystic fibrosis. Ann Clin Biochem 1999, 36:739–742.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Soldan W, Henker J, Sprossig C: Sensitivity and specificity of quantitative determination of pancreatic elastase 1 in feces of children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997, 24:53–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gullo L, Graziano L, Babbini S, et al.: Faecal elastase 1 in children with cystic fibrosis. Eur J Pediatr 1997, 156:770–772.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Amann ST, Bishop M, Curington C, Toskes PP: Fecal pancreatic elastase 1 is inaccurate in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 1996, 13:226–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dimagno EP: A perspective on the use of tubeless pancreatic function tests in diagnosis. Gut 1998, 43:2–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hamwi A, Veitl M, Maenner G, et al.: Pancreatic elastase 1 in stool: variations within one stool passage and individual changes from day to day. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2000, 112:32–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lankisch PG, Schreiber A, Otto J: Pancreolauryl test: evaluation of a tubeless pancreatic function test in comparison with other indirect and direct tests for exocrine pancreatic function. Dig Dis Sci 1983, 28:490–493.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lankisch PG, Brauneis J, Otto J, Goke B: Pancreolauryl and NBT-PABA tests. Are serum tests more practicable alternatives to urine tests in the diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency? Gastroenterology 1986, 90:350–354.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Malfertheiner P, Büchler M, Müller A, Ditschuneit H: The fluorescein dilaurate serum test following metoclopramide and secretin stimulation for evaluating pancreatic function: contribution to the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Z.Gastroenterol 1987, 25:225–232.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dominguez-Munoz Je, Malfertheiner P: Optimized serum pancreolauryl test for differentiating patients with and without chronic pancreatitis. Clin Chem 1998, 44:869–875. A new approach to optimize the pancreolauryl test is presented. Five hundred and sixty tests were analyzed, and the optimized method was prospectively evaluated in 271 consecutive patients.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lembcke B, Braden B, Caspary WF: Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency: accuracy and clinical value of the uniformly labelled 13C-Hiolein breath test. Gut 1996, 39:668–674.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ventrucci M, Cipolla A, Ubalducci GM, et al.: 13C labelled cholesteryl octanoate breath test for assessing pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Gut 1998, 42:81–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vantrappen GR, Rutgeerts PI, Ghoos YF, Hiele MJ: Mixed triglyceride breath test: a noninvasive test of pancreatic lipase activity in the duodenum. Gastroenterology 1989, 96:1126–1134.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Weaver LT, Amarri S, Swart GR: 13C mixed triglyceride breath test. Gut 1998, 43(suppl 3):S13–9-S13-S19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kato H, Nakao A, Kishimoto W, et al.: 13C-labeled trioctanoin breath test for exocrine pancreatic function test in patients after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 1993, 88:64–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wutzke KD, Radke M, Breuel K, et al.: Triglyceride oxidation in cystic fibrosis: a comparison between different 13C-labeled tracer substances. J.Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999, 29:148–154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Löser C, Mollgaard A, Aygen S, et al.: 13C-starch breath test: comparative clinical evaluation of an indirect pancreatic function test. Z Gastroenterol 1997, 35:187–194.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Evenepoel P, Hiele M, Geypens B, et al.: 13C-egg white breath test: a non-invasive test of pancreatic trypsin activity in the small intestine. Gut 2000, 46:52–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hiele M, Ghoos Y, Rutgeerts P, Vantrappen G: Starch digestion in normal subjects and patients with pancreatic disease, using a 13CO2 breath test. Gastroenterology 1989, 96:503–509.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Löser C, Brauer C, Aygen S, et al.: Comparative clinical evaluation of the 13C-mixed triglyceride breath test as an indirect pancreatic function test. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998, 33:327–334. Comparison of the majority of the commonly used pancreatic function tests: 13C-MTG, fecal fat, chymotrypsin and elastase, and the secretin-caerulein test.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Adamek RJ, Bodeker C, Szymanski C, et al.: 13C-mixed triglyceride CO2 exhalation test. Investigation with an isotope selective, non dispersive infrared spectrophotometer of indirect function of the exocrine pancreas. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1999, 124:103–108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boeck, W.G., Guido, A. & Gress, T.M. Pancreatic function tests: When to choose, what to use. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 3, 95–100 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-001-0004-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-001-0004-9

Keywords

Navigation