Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema in the United Kingdom

  • Microvascular Complications—Retinopathy (JK Sun, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Diabetes Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite advances in screening for and treatment of diabetes, diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy are still major causes of visual loss around the world. Systematic screening programs for diabetic eye disease have been developed in many countries. The main aim of these services is to reduce diabetes-related blindness and ease the burden of illness on the patients and their families. In the United Kingdom (UK), the NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Program offers annual digital fundus photography for all patients with diabetes over the age of 12 years regardless of their socio-economic status or ethnicity. In 2010–2011 a nationwide uptake of 79% was achieved. If disease is identified, referral to a specialized eye unit for further assessment and treatment are organized to take place within a pre-specified time frame. Internal and external quality assurance ensures efficacy and safety. This paper aims to summarize the current situation of diabetic retinopathy screening in the UK and outlines the challenges ahead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Duh E, Chung N, Wong T. Diabetic retinopathy and systemic complications. In: Duh E, editor. Diabetic retinopathy. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2009. p. 465–82.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheung N, Mitchell P, Wong T. Diabetic Retinopathy. Lancet. 2010;376:124–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS CRD). Complications of diabetes: screening for retinopathy, management of foot ulcers. E Health Care. 1999;5:1–12. Available at http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/EHC/ehc54.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  4. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:823–33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tanner V. Diabetic retinopathy. In: Kanski JJ, editor Clinical ophthalmology—a systematic approach. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2007; 573.

  6. Wright AD, Dodson PM. Medical management of diabetic retinopathy: fenofibrate and accord eye studies. Eye. 2011;25:843–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. The effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the progression of diabetic retinopathy in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. the Diabetes Control and Complication Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:36–51

  9. Massin P, Bandello F, Garweg JG, et al. Safety and efficacy of ranibizumab in diabetic macular oedema (RESOLVE Study): a 12-month, randomized, controlled, double masked multicentre phase II study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:2399–405.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell P, Bandello F, Schmidt-Ehrfurt U, et al. The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular oedema. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:615–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Randomised clinical trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic maculae oedema. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1064–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Michaelides M, Kaines A, Hamilton RD, et al. A prospective randomised trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy in the management of diabetic macular oedema. (BOLT Study) 12 months data: Report 2. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1078–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programme, at http://diabeticeye.screening.nhs.uk

  14. City and Guild Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Level 3 qualification http://www.cityandguilds.com/46827.html

  15. The “Test and Training Set” www.drseqa.org

  16. Stefansson E, Bek T, Porta M, et al. Screening and prevention of diabetic blindness. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78:374–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Scanlon PH. The English National screening programme for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. J Med Screen. 2008;15(1):1–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Arora S, Kolb S, Goyder E, McKibbin MM. Trends in the incidence of visual impairment resulting from diabetic retinopathy in the Leeds metropolitan area, 2005–2010. Diabet Med. 2012 Feb 22. [Epub ahead of print].

  19. The Information Centre for Health and Social Care: Registered Blind and Partially sighted people—Year ending 31 March 2011, in England. http://www.ic.nhs.uk/statistics-and-data-collections/social-care/adult-social-care-information/registered-blind-and-partially-sighted-people--year-ending-31-march-2011-in-england

  20. • Klein R, Klein BEK. Are individuals with diabetes seeing better? A long-term epidemiological perspective. Diabetes. 2010;59(8):1853–60. This paper is of importance as it is a good review of major studies that examine the relationship between diabetic retinopathy and systemic risk factors.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahola AJ, Saraheimo M, Forsblom C, et al; FinnDiane Study Group. Health-related quality of life in patients with type 1 diabetes—association with diabetic complications (the FinnDiane Study). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(6):1903-8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davidov E, Breitscheidel L, Clouth J, et al. Diabetic retinopathy and health-related quality of life. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247(2):267–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gabrielian A, Hariprasad SM, Jager RD, et al. The utility of visual function questionnaire in the assessment of the impact of diabetic retinopathy on vision-related quality of life. Eye. 2010;124:29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hariprasad SM, Mieler WF, Grassi JL, et al. Vision-related quality of life in patients with diabetic macular edema. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(1):89–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zoega GM, Gunnarsdottir T, Bjornsdottir S, et al. Screening compliance and visual outcome in diabetes. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005;83(6):687–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yeo ST, Edwards RT, Fargher EA, et al. Preferences of people with diabetes for diabetic retinopathy screening: a discrete choice experiment. Diabet Med. 2012 March13. [Epub ahead of print].

  27. Royal College of Ophthalmologists: Section 5 Screening for diabetic retinopathy. Available at http://www.rcophth.ac.uk

  28. Crijns H, Hendrikse F. Continuous computer simulation analysis of the cost-effectiveness of screening and treating diabetic retinopathy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999;15:0198–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Polak BC, Crijns H, Casparie AF, Niessen LW. Cost-effectiveness of glycaemic control and ophthalmological care in diabetic retinopathy. Health Policy. 2003;64:89–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. James M, Turner DA, Broadbent DM, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of screening for sight threatening diabetic eye disease. Br Med J. 2000;320:1627–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Facey K, Cummins E, Macpherson K, et al. Health technology assessment report 1: Organization of services for diabetic retinopathy screening. Available at http://www.ndrs.scot.nhs.uk/Links/Docs/hta1.pdf

  32. Scott IU, Edwards AR, Aiello LP, et al. A phase II randomized clinical trial of intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema. diabetic retinopathy clinical research network. Ophthalmol. 2007;114:1860–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Beck RW, Edwards AR, Aiello LP, et al. Three-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing focal/grid photocoagulation and intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net). Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:245–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Aiello LP, Edwards AR, Beck RW, et al. Factors associated with improvement and worsening of visual acuity 2 years after focal/grid photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Diabetic retinopathy clinical research network. Ophthalmol. 2010;117:946–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Glassman AR, Beck RW, Brownning DJ, et al. Comparison of optical coherence tomography in diabetic macular edema, with and without reading center manual grading from a clinical trials prospective. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Study Group. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:560–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. • Mackenzie S, Schmermer C, et al. SDOCT imaging to identify macular pathology in patients diagnosed with diabetic maculopathy by a digital photographic retinal screening programme. PLoS one 2011;6(5);e14811. This abstract combines the assessment of new technology with assessment of a new pathway and is conducted in a clinic setting .

  37. Virgili G, Menchini F, Dimastogiovanni AF, et al. Optical coherence tomography versus stereoscopic fundus photography or biomicroscopy for diagnosing diabetic macular edema: a systematic review. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;49:2627–34.

    Google Scholar 

  38. • Noble J, Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, et al. Comparison of nonmydriatic optos® fundus imaging with mydriatic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) 7-Standard field stereo photography and clinical grading. ARVO 20011:Abstract 1283. This abstract shows an excellent example of a well-conducted validation study for new technology.

  39. •• Goatman K, Charnley A, Webster L and Nussey S. Assessment of automated disease detection in diabetic retinopathy screening using two-field photography. PLOS one 2011;6(12) This paper opens up a new avenue on automated grading.

  40. Stefansson E, Bek T, Porta M, et al. Screening and prevention of diabetic blindness. Acta Ophth Scand. 2000;78:374–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Thomas RL, Dunstan F, Luzio SD, et al. Incidence of diabetic retinopathy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending the diabetic retinopathy screening services for wales: retrospective analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:e874.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Younis N, Broadbent DM, Vora JP, Harding SP. Incidence of sight-threatening retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes in the liverpool diabetic eye study: a cohort study. Lancet. 2003;361:195–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Olafsdottir E, Stefansson E. Biennial eye screening in patients with diabetes without retinopathy; 10-year experience. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;91:1599–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kohner EM, Stratton IM, Aldington SJ, et al. Relationship between the severity of retinopathy and progression to photocoagulation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UKPDS (UKPDS 52). Diabet Med. 2001;18:178–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Vijan S, Hofer T, Hayward R. Cost-utility analysis of screening intervals for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2000;283:889–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Cruickshanks KJ. The wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy: XVII. The 14-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy and associated risk factors in type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1801–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Lyons TJ, Jenkins AJ, Zheng D, et al. Diabetic retinopathy and serum lipoprotein substances in the DCCT/EDIC cohort. IOVS. 2004;45:910–8.

    Google Scholar 

  48. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998;317:703–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Stratton IM, Kohner EM, Aldington SJ, et al. UKPDS 50: risk factors for incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy in type II diabetes over 6 years from diagnosis. Diabetologia. 2001;44:256–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kristinsson JK. Diabetic retinopathy screening and prevention of blindness. A doctoral thesis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 1997;223:1–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Aspelund T, Porisdottir O, Olafsdottir E, Gudmundsdottir A, Einarsdottir AB, et al. Individual risk assessment and information technology to optimize screening frequency for diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia. 2011;54:2525–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Jones S, Edwards T. Diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review of the economic evidence. Diabet Med. 2010;27:249–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. • Sivaprasad S, Gupta B, Gulliford M, Dodhia H, Mohamed M et al. Ethnic variations in the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in people with diabetes attending screening in the United Kingdom (DRIVE UK). PloS One. 2012; 7(3):e32182. This paper is of importance to those who work in ethnically diverse communities.

  54. Klein R, Sharrett AR, Klein BE, Moss SE, Folsom AR, et al. The association of atherosclerosis, vascular risk factors and retinopathy in adults with diabetes: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1225–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wong TY, Klein R, Islam FM, Cotch MF, Folsom AR, et al. Diabetic retinopathy in a multi-ethnic cohort in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:446–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. • McGeechan K, Liew G, Macaskill P, et al. Prediction of incident stroke events based on retinal vessel caliber: a systematic review and individual-participant meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(11):1323–32. This paper is of importance as it is a well-conducted meta-analysis and contains all seminal papers in this field.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. • Ong HS, Levin S, Vafidis G. Glaucoma detection using optic disc images from the English National Screening Programme for diabetic retinopathy. J Glaucoma 2012 Jan 20. [Epub ahead of print]. This paper can potentially influence how the screening imaging might be used for glaucoma screening as well.

  58. • Hadley G, Earnshaw JJ, Stratton I, Sykes J, Scanlon PH. A potential pathway for managing diabetic patients with arterial emboli detected by retinal screening. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42(2):153–57. This paper is of importance as it shows how screening might influence patient pathway.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Conflicts of interest: T. Peto: has been a consultant for Solvay; C. Tadros: none.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tunde Peto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peto, T., Tadros, C. Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema in the United Kingdom. Curr Diab Rep 12, 338–345 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-012-0285-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-012-0285-4

Keywords

Navigation