Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Optimizing rectal cancer surgery by total mesorectal excision and “cylindrical” extralevator techniques for abdominoperineal excision

  • Published:
Current Colorectal Cancer Reports

Abstract

Since total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer was first described in 1988, widespread adoption of this technique has improved oncologic outcomes significantly. However, improved survival and decreased local recurrence rates in patients having anterior resection have not translated into equivalent improvements in those having abdominoperineal excision and permanent stoma. The most significant factor in determining appropriate first-line treatment is accurate and reproducible prediction of a negative circumferential resection margin. MRI is quickly emerging as the gold standard for the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. It may be the key to assessing whether safe restorative resection is feasible or an abdominoperineal excision may be oncologically superior when performed in a more radical or cylindrical (extralevator) plane. This article explores the latest evidence for optimizing surgery in rectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Dehni N, McFadden N, McNamara DA, et al.: Oncological results following abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 2003, 46:867–874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, et al.: Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2004, 47:48–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, et al.: Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 1986, 2:996–999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dulk M, Marijnen CAM, Putter H, et al.: Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdomino-perineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial. Ann Surg 2007, 246:83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E, et al.: Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2002, 89:327–334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD: The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982, 69:613–616.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heald RJ: The ‘Holy Plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 1988, 81:503–508.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, et al.: Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997. Arch Surg 1998, 133:894–899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland: Guidelines for the Management of Colorectal Cancer, edn 3. London: Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Standards Practice Task Force; The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons: Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 2005, 48:411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, et al.: Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Lancet 2000, 356:93–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kapiteijn E, Putter H, van de Velde CJ. Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in the Netherlands. Br J Surg 2002, 89:1142–1149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wibe A, Moller B, Norstein J, et al.: A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer: implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 2002, 45:857–866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Quirke P, Steele R, Monson R, et al.: Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2009, 373:821–828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Engel AF, Oomen JL, Eijsbouts QA, et al.: Nationwide decline in annual numbers of abdominoperineal resections: effect of successful national trial? Colorectal Dis 2003, 5:180–184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Branagan G, Finnis D; Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group: Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2005, 48:1021–1026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG, et al.: Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using highresolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 2003, 90:355–364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. MERCURY Study Group: Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ 2006, 333:779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bartram C, Brown G: Endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer staging. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2002, 31:827–839.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al.: Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Eng J Med 2004, 351:1731–1740.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pijl MEJ, Chaoui AS, Wahl RL, et al.: Radiology of colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2002, 38:887–898.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Glancy DG, Pullyblank AM, Thomas MG: The role of colonoscopic endoanal ultrasound scanning (EUS) in selecting patients suitable for resection by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Colorectal Dis 2005, 7:148–150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marr R, Birbeck KF, Garvican J, et al.: The modern abdominoperineal excision — the next challenge after total mesorectal excision: a clinical and morphometric study. Ann Surg 2005, 242:74–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shihab O, Brown G, Daniels I, et al.: Patients with low rectal cancer treated by abdomino-perineal excision have worse tumours and higher involved margin rates compared with those treated by anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum (in press).

  25. Heald RJ, Smedh RK, Kald A, et al.: Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum—an endangered operation. Dis Colon Rectum 1997, 40:747–751.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJH, Marijnen CA, et al.: Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:9257–9264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Salerno G, Daniels IR, Brown G: Magnetic resonance imaging of the low rectum: defining the radiological anatomy. Colorectal Dis 2006, 8:10–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Holm T, Ljung A, Haggmark T, et al.: Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2007, 94:232–238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, et al.: Evidence of the oncological superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008, 26:3517–3522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital Foundation Trust, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 9NA, UK

    Brendan J. Moran

Authors
  1. Katharine E. Bevan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brendan J. Moran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendan J. Moran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bevan, K.E., Moran, B.J. Optimizing rectal cancer surgery by total mesorectal excision and “cylindrical” extralevator techniques for abdominoperineal excision. Curr colorectal cancer rep 5, 219–223 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-009-0030-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-009-0030-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation