Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complications of Cardiac Transplantation

  • Heart Failure (H Eisen, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Despite the improvement in medical therapy for heart failure and the advancements in mechanical circulatory support, heart transplantation (HT) still remains the best therapeutic option to improve survival and quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure. Nevertheless, HT recipients are exposed to the risk of several potential complications that may impair their outcomes. In this article, we aim to provide a practical and scholarly framework for clinicians approaching heart transplant medicine, as well as a concise update for the experienced readers on the most relevant post-HT complications.

Recent Findings

While recognizing that most of the treatments herein discussed are based more on experience than on solid scientific evidence, significant step forward has been made in particular in the recognition and management of primary graft dysfunction, antibody-mediated rejection, and renal dysfunction.

Summary

Complications after HT may vary according to the time from surgery and can be related to graft function and pathology or to diseases and dysfunctions occurring in other organs or systems, mainly as side effects of immunosuppressive drugs and progression of pre-existing conditions. Future research needs to focus on improving precision diagnostics of causes of graft dysfunction and on reaching an optimal and customized balance between efficacy and toxicities of immunosuppressive strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Lund LH, Khush KK, Cherikh WS, Goldfarb S, Kucheryavaya AY, Levvey BJ, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirty-fourth adult heart transplantation report—2017; focus theme: allograft ischemic time. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1037–46.

  2. Lindenfeld J, Miller G, Shakar S, Zolty R, Lowes BD, Wolfel EE, et al. Drug therapy in the heart transplant recipient. Part II: immunosuppressive drugs. Circulation. 2004;110:3858–65.

  3. Lund LH, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, Benden C, Dipchand AI, Goldfarb S, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirty-second official adult heart transplantation report—2015; focus theme: early graft failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34:1244–54.

  4. • Erasmus M, Neyrink A, Sabatino M, Potena L. Heart allograft preservation: an arduous journey from the donor to the recipient. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017; Comprehensive review of current and future techniques for heart preservation.

  5. Kumarasinghe G, Gao L, Hicks M, Villanueva J, Doyle A, Rao P, et al. Improved heart function from older donors using pharmacologic conditioning strategies. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35:636–46.

  6. • Kobashigawa J, Zuckermann A, Macdonald P, Leprince P, Esmailian F, Luu M, et al. Report from a consensus conference on primary graft dysfunction after cardiac transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33:327–40. Seminal paper defining primary graft dysfunction in heart transplantation.

  7. Cosio Carmena MD, Gomez Bueno M, Almenar L, et al. Primary graft failure after heart transplantation: characteristics in a contemporary cohort and performance of the RADIAL risk score. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:1187–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. • Sabatino M, Vitale G, Manfredini V, Masetti M, Borgese L, Maria Raffa G, et al. Clinical relevance of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus classification of primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation: epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1217–25. Clinical validation of the consensus definition of primary graft dysfunction.

  9. Grigioni F, Potena L, Galie N, et al. Prognostic implications of serial assessments of pulmonary hypertension in severe chronic heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25:1241–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koulova A, Gass AL, Patibandla S, Gupta CA, Aronow WS, Lanier GM. Management of pulmonary hypertension from left heart disease in candidates for orthotopic heart transplantation. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:2640–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghio S, Crimi G, Pica S, Temporelli PL, Boffini M, Rinaldi M, et al. Persistent abnormalities in pulmonary arterial compliance after heart transplantation in patients with combined post-capillary and pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0188383.

  12. Sabato LA, Salerno DM, Moretz JD, Jennings DL. Inhaled pulmonary vasodilator therapy for management of right ventricular dysfunction after left ventricular assist device placement and cardiac transplantation. Pharmacotherapy. 2017;37:944–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rajek A, Pernerstorfer T, Kastner J, Mares P, Grabenwöger M, Sessler DI, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide reduces pulmonary vascular resistance more than prostaglandin E(1) during heart transplantation. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:523–30.

  14. Bonet LA, Guillen RV, Lazaro IS, et al. Intravenous sildenafil in right ventricular dysfunction with pulmonary hypertension following a heart transplant. Heart Int. 2014;9:22–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. D'Ancona G, Santise G, Falletta C, Pirone F, Sciacca S, Turrisi M, et al. Primary graft failure after heart transplantation: the importance of donor pharmacological management. Transplant Proc. 2010;42:710–2.

  16. D’Alessandro C, Aubert S, Golmard JL, Praschker BL, Luyt CE, Pavie A, et al. Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation temporary support for early graft failure after cardiac transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:343–9.

  17. Santise G, Petrou M, Pepper JR, Dreyfus G, Khaghani A, Birks EJ. Levitronix as a short-term salvage treatment for primary graft failure after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25:495–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mihaljevic T, Jarrett CM, Gonzalez-Stawinski G, Smedira NG, Nowicki ER, Thuita L, et al. Mechanical circulatory support after heart transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:200–6. discussion 6

  19. Takeda K, Li B, Garan AR, Topkara VK, Han J, Colombo PC, et al. Improved outcomes from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus ventricular assist device temporary support of primary graft dysfunction in heart transplant. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Jun;36(6):650–6.

  20. Stewart S, Winters GL, Fishbein MC, Tazelaar HD, Kobashigawa J, Abrams J, et al. Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24:1710–20.

  21. • Berry GJ, Burke MM, Andersen C, Bruneval P, Fedrigo M, Fishbein MC, et al. The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the pathologic diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:1147–62. Reference paper for diagnostic criteria of ABMR.

  22. Caves PK, Stinson EB, Billingham ME, Shumway NE. Serial transvenous biopsy of the transplanted human heart. Improved management of acute rejection episodes. Lancet. 1974;1:821–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Crespo-Leiro MG, Zuckermann A, Bara C, Mohacsi P, Schulz U, Boyle A, et al. Concordance among pathologists in the second cardiac allograft rejection gene expression observational study (CARGO II). Transplantation. 2012;94:1172–7.

  24. Angelini A, Andersen CB, Bartoloni G, Black F, Bishop P, Doran H, et al. A web-based pilot study of inter-pathologist reproducibility using the ISHLT 2004 working formulation for biopsy diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection: the European experience. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:1214–20.

  25. Pham MX, Teuteberg JJ, Kfoury AG, Starling RC, Deng MC, Cappola TP, et al. Gene-expression profiling for rejection surveillance after cardiac transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1890–900.

  26. Manfredini V, Leone O, Agostini V, Potena L. Antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation: new developments and old uncertainties. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2017;22:207–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. • Chih S, Tinckam KJ, Ross HJ. A survey of current practice for antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:1069–74. Important survey on clinical practices about treatment of antibody mediated rejection.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bruneval P, Angelini A, Miller D, Potena L, Loupy A, Zeevi A, et al. The XIIIth Banff conference on allograft pathology: the Banff 2015 heart meeting report: improving antibody-mediated rejection diagnostics: strengths, unmet needs, and future directions. Am J Transplant. 2017;17:42–53.

  29. Colvin M, Cook J, Chang P, Francis G, Hsu DT, Kiernan MS, et al. Antibody-mediated rejection in cardiac transplantation: emerging knowledge in diagnosis and management. Circulation. 2015;131:1608–39.

  30. Kobashigawa J, Crespo-Leiro MG, Ensminger SM, Reichenspurner H, Angelini A, Berry G, et al. Report from a consensus conference on antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:252–69.

  31. St Goar FG, Pinto FJ, Alderman EL, et al. Intracoronary ultrasound in cardiac transplant recipients. In vivo evidence of “angiographically silent” intimal thickening. Circulation. 1992;85:979–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mehra MR, Crespo-Leiro MG, Dipchand A, Ensminger SM, Hiemann NE, Kobashigawa JA, et al. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulation of a standardized nomenclature for cardiac allograft vasculopathy-2010. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29:717–27.

  33. Weis M, Scheidt W. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a review. Circulation. 1997;96:2069–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Prada-Delgado O, Estevez-Loureiro R, Paniagua-Martin MJ, Lopez-Sainz A, Crespo-Leiro MG. Prevalence and prognostic value of cardiac allograft vasculopathy 1 year after heart transplantation according to the ISHLT recommended nomenclature. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012;31:332–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Potena L, Masetti M, Sabatino M, Bacchi-Reggiani ML, Pece V, Prestinenzi P, et al. Interplay of coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in predicting long-term outcomes after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34:1146–53.

  36. •• Eisen HJ, Kobashigawa J, Starling RC, Pauly DF, Kfoury A, Ross H, et al. Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplantation: a randomized, multicenter trial. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:1203–16. Largest randomized trial ever conducted in heart transplantation.

  37. • Clemmensen TS, Holm NR, Eiskjaer H, et al. Layered fibrotic plaques are the predominant component in cardiac allograft vasculopathy: systematic findings and risk stratification by OCT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:773–84. Important in vivo anatomic findings in allograft vasculopathy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Caforio AL, Tona F, Fortina AB, et al. Immune and nonimmune predictors of cardiac allograft vasculopathy onset and severity: multivariate risk factor analysis and role of immunosuppression. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:962–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Colvin-Adams M, Agnihotri A. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: current knowledge and future direction. Clin Transpl. 2011;25:175–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Huibers MM, Vink A, Kaldeway J, et al. Distinct phenotypes of cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation: a histopathological study. Atherosclerosis. 2014;236:353–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. •• Loupy A, Toquet C, Rouvier P, Beuscart T, Bories MC, Varnous S, et al. Late failing heart allografts: pathology of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and association with antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant. 2016;16:111–20. An outstanding report about findings on allografts from autopsies and explants in patients with severe CAV.

  42. Alam M, Shahzad SA, Akhtar A, Huang HD, Rogers PA, Ramanathan KB, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery in heart transplant patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Int J Cardiol. 2012;156:101–4.

  43. Agarwal S, Parashar A, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM, Modi D, Starling RC, et al. Long-term mortality after cardiac allograft vasculopathy: implications of percutaneous intervention. JACC Heart Fail. 2014;2:281–8.

  44. Fishman JA. Infection in solid-organ transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2601–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. San Juan R, Aguado JM, Lumbreras C, Díaz-Pedroche C, López-Medrano F, Lizasoain M, et al. Incidence, clinical characteristics and risk factors of late infection in solid organ transplant recipients: data from the RESITRA study group. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:964–71.

  46. Costanzo MR, Dipchand A, Starling R, et al. The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29:914–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Potena L, Holweg CT, Vana ML, et al. Frequent occult infection with cytomegalovirus in cardiac transplant recipients despite antiviral prophylaxis. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1804–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. • Kotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, Åsberg A, Chou S, Danziger-Isakov L, et al. Updated international consensus guidelines on the management of cytomegalovirus in solid-organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2013;96:333–60. Reference paper on CMV diagnosis and treatment after solid organ transplantation.

  49. Naraqi S. Cytomegalovirus. Textbook of human virology. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc.; 1991. p. 889–924.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mocarski ES Jr. Immunomodulation by cytomegaloviruses: manipulative strategies beyond evasion. Trends Microbiol. 2002;10:332–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kudchodkar SB, Yu Y, Maguire TG, Alwine JC. Human cytomegalovirus infection induces rapamycin-insensitive phosphorylation of downstream effectors of mTOR kinase. J Virol. 2004;78:11030–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Potena L, Solidoro P, Patrucco F, Borgese L. Treatment and prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in heart and lung transplantation: an update. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17:1611–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Potena L, Valantine HA. Cytomegalovirus-associated allograft rejection in heart transplant patients. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2007;20:425–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Singh N. Antiviral drugs for cytomegalovirus in transplant recipients: advantages of preemptive therapy. Rev Med Virol. 2006;16:281–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Emery VC. Prophylaxis for CMV should not now replace pre-emptive therapy in solid organ transplantation. Rev Med Virol. 2001;11:83–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Snydman DR. The case for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in solid organ transplantation. Rev Med Virol. 2006;16:289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kowalski RJ, Post DR, Mannon RB, Sebastian A, Wright HI, Sigle G, et al. Assessing relative risks of infection and rejection: a meta-analysis using an immune function assay. Transplantation. 2006;82:663–8.

  58. Kobashigawa JA, Kiyosaki KK, Patel JK, Kittleson MM, Kubak BM, Davis SN, et al. Benefit of immune monitoring in heart transplant patients using ATP production in activated lymphocytes. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29:504–8.

  59. •• Ravaioli M, Neri F, Lazzarotto T, Bertuzzo VR, di Gioia P, Stacchini G, et al. Immunosuppression modifications based on an immune response assay: results of a randomized, controlled trial. Transplantation. 2015;99:1625–32. Important study supporting the concept that immune monitoring may be more effective than drug monitoring to balance immunosuppressive treatment in transplant recipients.

  60. Potena L, Gaudenzi A, Chiereghin A, et al. Quantiferon monitor: a novel immune monitoring assay to stratify risk of infection after heart transplantation. Transpl Int. 2017;30:538.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Gonzalez-Vilchez F, Vazquez de Prada JA. Chronic renal insufficiency in heart transplant recipients: risk factors and management options. Drugs. 2014;74:1481–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. • Mehra MR, Canter CE, Hannan MM, Semigran MJ, Uber PA, Baran DA, et al. The 2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation listing criteria for heart transplantation: a 10-year update. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35:1–23. Seminal paper on indications for heart transplantation.

  63. Schiferer A, Zuckermann A, Dunkler D, Eskandary F, Bernardi M, Hiesmayr M, et al. Acute kidney injury and outcome after heart transplantation: large differences in performance of scoring systems. Transplantation. 2016;100:2439–46.

  64. Alvarez Arroyo MV, Suzuki Y, Yague S, et al. Role of endogenous vascular endothelial growth factor in tubular cell protection against acute cyclosporine toxicity. Transplantation. 2002;74:1618–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Liptak P, Ivanyi B. Primer: histopathology of calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity in renal allografts. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2006;2:398–404.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Patel J, Kobashigawa JA. Minimization of immunosuppression: transplant immunology. Transpl Immunol. 2008;20:48–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Gonzalez-Vilchez F, Vazquez de Prada JA, Paniagua MJ, Gomez-Bueno M, Arizon JM, Almenar L, et al. Use of mTOR inhibitors in chronic heart transplant recipients with renal failure: calcineurin-inhibitors conversion or minimization? Int J Cardiol. 2014;171:15–23.

  68. • Cornu C, Dufays C, Gaillard S, Gueyffier F, Redonnet M, Sebbag L, et al. Impact of the reduction of calcineurin inhibitors on renal function in heart transplant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;78:24–32. Meta-analysis on the use of mTOR inhibitors as renal sparing strategy.

  69. •• Andreassen AK, Andersson B, Gustafsson F, Eiskjaer H, Rådegran G, Gude E, et al. Everolimus initiation with early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal in de novo heart transplant recipients: three-year results from the randomized SCHEDULE study. Am J Transplant. 2016;16:1238–47. First randomized study showing safety of early CNI avoidance strategy in heart transplantation.

  70. • Potena L, Pellegrini C, Grigioni F, et al. Optimizing the safety profile of everolimus by delayed initiation in de novo heart transplant recipients: results of the prospective randomized study EVERHEART. Transplantation. 2018 Mar;102(3):493–501. Important randomized study guiding the timing of everolimus utilization in heart transplant recipients.

  71. Zuckermann A, Wang SS, Epailly E, Barten MJ, Sigurdardottir V, Segovia J, et al. Everolimus immunosuppression in de novo heart transplant recipients: what does the evidence tell us now? Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2013;27:76–84.

  72. Gonzalez-Vilchez F, Arizon JM, Segovia J, et al. Chronic renal dysfunction in maintenance heart transplant patients: the ICEBERG study. Transplant Proc. 2014;46:14–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Gullestad L, Mortensen SA, Eiskjaer H, et al. Two-year outcomes in thoracic transplant recipients after conversion to everolimus with reduced calcineurin inhibitor within a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial. Transplantation. 2010;90:1581–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Piselli P, Serraino D, Segoloni GP, Sandrini S, Piredda GB, Scolari MP, et al. Risk of de novo cancers after transplantation: results from a cohort of 7217 kidney transplant recipients, Italy 1997–2009. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:336–44.

  75. Gutierrez-Dalmau A, Campistol JM. Immunosuppressive therapy and malignancy in organ transplant recipients: a systematic review. Drugs. 2007;67:1167–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Crespo-Leiro MG, Villa-Arranz A, Manito-Lorite N, Paniagua-Martin MJ, Rábago G, Almenar-Bonet L, et al. Lung cancer after heart transplantation: results from a large multicenter registry. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:1035–40.

  77. Hojo M, Morimoto T, Maluccio M, Asano T, Morimoto K, Lagman M, et al. Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism. Nature. 1999;397:530–4.

  78. Tremblay F, Fernandes M, Habbab F, de BEMD, Loertscher R, Meterissian S. Malignancy after renal transplantation: incidence and role of type of immunosuppression. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:785–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Taylor L, Hughes RA, McPherson K. The risk of cancer from azathioprine as a treatment for multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2004;11:141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Hare SH, Harvey AJ. mTOR function and therapeutic targeting in breast cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7:383–404.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Campistol JM, Eris J, Oberbauer R, Friend P, Hutchison B, Morales JM, et al. Sirolimus therapy after early cyclosporine withdrawal reduces the risk for cancer in adult renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:581–9.

  82. Epailly E, Albanell J, Andreassen A, Bara C, Campistol JM, Delgado JF, et al. Proliferation signal inhibitors and post-transplant malignancies in heart transplantation: practical clinical management questions. Clin Transpl. 2011 Sep–Oct;25(5):E475–86.

  83. Yanik EL, Siddiqui K, Engels EA. Sirolimus effects on cancer incidence after kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis. Cancer Med. 2015;4:1448–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano Potena.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

LP received speaker honoraria from Sandoz, One Lambda, and Novartis and institutional grant support from Qiagen.

AZ received speaker honoraria from One Lambda, Sanofi, and Mallincrodt and institutional grant support from Biotest, Chiesi.

AAZ received travel grants from Sanofi and institutional grant support from Fresenius.

FB declares that he has no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

This article does not contain any studies with animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Heart Failure

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Potena, L., Zuckermann, A., Barberini, F. et al. Complications of Cardiac Transplantation. Curr Cardiol Rep 20, 73 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-018-1018-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-018-1018-3

Keywords

Navigation