Skip to main content
Log in

Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Therapies: Patient Selection, Prosthesis Assessment and Selection, Results, and Future Directions

  • Valvular Heart Disease (V Nkomo, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of transcatheter valve implantations (TAVI) has induced profound changes in the treatment of valvular heart disease over the past decade. At the same time, due to excellent clinical results, bioprostheses continuously outperformed mechanical prostheses. The increasing number of elderly patients has led to numerous patients presenting with deteriorated bioprostheses needing reoperation. In selected high-risk patients or patients with unreasonable surgical risk, valve-in-valve TAVI has advanced to a viable alternative to conventional redo surgery. High procedural success, good hemodynamics and acceptable clinical results were reported up until now. Valve-in-valve TAVI seems to be safe and effective in treatment of deteriorated valve prostheses in high-risk patients. The valve-in-valve concept presents the next step toward an individual treatment strategy for patients at prohibitive risk for conventional surgery. Present studies were reviewed with special concern to patient selection, prosthesis assessment, device selection, clinical outcome and technical challenging aspects as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Wilbring M, Alexiou K, Tugtekin SM, et al. Transapical transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for deteriorated mitral valve bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.004. This article gives detailed information about technical aspects of transapical mitral valve-in-valve TAVI.

  2. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation. 2002;106:3006–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gurvitch R, Cheung A, Ye J, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed surgical bioprosthetic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2196–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Seiffert M, Conradi L, Baldus S, et al. Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation in patients with degenerated bioprostheses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:341–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Piazza N, Bleiziffer S, Brockmann G, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for failing surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve: from concept to clinical application and evaluation (part 1). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:721–32. This article provides detailed information about failing mechanisms of prosthetic valves and gives detailed report of several cases.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones JM, O'kane H, Gladstone DJ, et al. Repeat heart valve surgery: risk factors for operative mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:913–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maganti M, Rao V, Armstrong S, et al. Redo valvular surgery in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:521–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Walther T, Falk V, Dewey T, et al. Valve-in-a-valve concept for transcatheter minimally invasive repeat xenograft implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:56–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Linke A, et al. Transapical off-pump valve-in-valve implantation in patients with degenerated aortic xenografts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1934–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. •• Eggebrecht H, Schäfer U, Treede H, et al. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:1218–27. This well-designed study provides essential information and technical insights about valve-in-valve TAVI.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilbring M, Sill B, Tugtekin SM, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for deteriorated aortic bioprosthesis: initial clinical results and follow-up in a series of high-risk patients. Ann ThoracSurg. 2012;93:734–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kempfert J, Blumenstein JM, Borger MA, et al. Minimally invasive off-pump valve-in-a-valve implantation: the atrial transcatheter approach for re-operative mitral valve replacement. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2382–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheung A, Webb JG, Wong DR, et al. Transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation in a human. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:e18–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seiffert M, Franzen O, Conradi L, et al. Series of transcatheter valve-in-valve implantations in high-risk patients with degenerated bioprostheses in aortic and mitral position. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76:608–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheung AW, Gurvitch R, Ye J, et al. Transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantations for a failed bioprosthesis: a case series. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:711–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kempfert J, Blumenstein J, Chu MW, et al. Minimally invasive off-pump valve-in-a-ring implantation: the atrial transcatheter approach for re-operative mitral valve replacement after failed repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35:965–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghazy T, Kappert U, Ouda A, et al. A question of clinical reliability: observed versus EuroSCORE-predicted mortalityafter aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis. 2010;19:16–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. • Walther T, Schuler G, Borger MA, et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation in 100 consecutive patients: comparison to propensity-matched conventional aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1398–403. Well-designed study providing baseline clinical results of the TAVI-procedure in comparison with conventional aortic valve replacement.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Conradi L, Seiffert M, Treede H, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis in patients at high surgical risk. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:64–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Webb JG, Lichtenstein S. Transcatheter percutaneous and transapical aortic valve replacement. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;19:304–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Linke A, et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation: therapy of choice for patients with aortic stenosis and porcelain aorta? Ann Thorac Surg. Nov. 2010;90:1457–61.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Christakis GT, Buth KJ, Goldman BS, et al. Inaccurate and misleading valve sizing: a proposed standard for valve size nomenclature. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1198–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shibata T, Inoue K, Ikuta T, et al. Which valve and which size should we use in the valve-on-valve technique for re-do mitral valve surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;8:206–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nietlispach F, Wijesinghe N, Wood D, et al. Current balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve and delivery systems. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75:295–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Azadani AN, Jaussaud N, Matthews PB, et al. Aortic valve-in-valve implantation: impact of transcatheter- bioprosthesis size mismatch. J Heart Valve Dis. 2009;18:367–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Khawaja MZ, Haworth P, Ghuran A, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for stenosed and regurgitant aortic valve bioprostheses CoreValve for failed bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:97–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hasan BS, McElhinney DB, Brown DW, et al. Short-term performance of the transcatheter Melody valve in high-pressure hemodynamic environments in the pulmonary and systemic circulations. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:615–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kempfert J, Blumenstein J, Chu MW, et al. Minimally invasive off-pump valve-in-a-ring implantation: the atrial transcatheter approach for re-operative mitral valve replacement after failed repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35:965–9. discussion 969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. • Kondo N, Shuto T, McGarvey JR, et al. Melody valve-in-ring procedure for mitral valve replacement: feasibility in four annuloplasty types. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:783–8. This article gives an idea of developing fields in valve-in-valve TAVI.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cerillo AG, Chiaramonti F, Murzi M, et al. Transcatheter valve in valve implantation for failed mitral and tricuspid bioprosthesis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;78:987–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jux C, Akintuerk H, Schranz D. Two melodies in concert: Transcatheter double-valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Nov 22.

  32. Riede FT, Dähnert I. Implantation of a Melody® valve in triscuspid position. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;80:474–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Faza N, Kenny D, Kavinsky C, et al. Single center comparative outcomes of the edwardssapien and medtronic melody transcatheter heart valves in the pulmonary position. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep 25.

  34. Kapetanakis EI, MacCarthy P, Monaghan M, Wendler O. Trans-apical aortic valve implantation in a patient with stentless valve degeneration. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39(6):1051–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bagur R, Rodés-Cabau J, De Larochellière R, et al. Transfemoral aortic valve-in-valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve for the treatment of stentless xenograft severe aortic regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:1248–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Finch J, Roussin I, Pepper J. Failing stentless aortic valves: redo aortic root replacement or valve in a valve? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Aug 29.

  37. Seiffert M, Baldus S, Conradi L, et al. Simultaneous transcatheter aortic and mitral valve-in-valve implantation in a patient with degenerated bioprostheses and high surgical risk. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;59:490–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pasic M, Unbehaun A, Dreysse S, et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation after previous aortic valve replacement: clinical proof of the "valve-in-valve" concept. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:270–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Webb JG, Wood DA, Ye J, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic heart valves. Circulation. 2010;121:1848–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gotzmann M, Mügge A, Bojara W. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for treatment of patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses–valve-in-valve technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76:1000–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wenaweser P, Pilgrim T, Windecker S, et al. Transapical valve-in-valve implantation for regurgitant stented aortic bioprostheses. J Heart Valve Dis. 2012;21:344–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Piazza N, Bleiziffer S, Brockmann G, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for failing surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve: from concept to clinical application and evaluation (part 2). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:733–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Roberts PA, Boudjemline Y, Cheatham JP, et al. Percutaneous tricuspid valve replacement in congenital and acquired heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:117–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. • Danny Dvir, MD, on behalf of the Global Valve-in-Valve Registry investigators. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for the Treatment of Degenerative Bioprosthetic Surgical Valves: Results from the Global Valve-in-Valve Registry. Presented at EuroPCR 2012; www.valveinvalve.com. This is the largest collection of valve-in-valve TAVI up to now

  45. McElhinney DB, Hellenbrand WE, Zahn EM, et al. Short- and medium-term outcomes after transcatheter pulmonary valve placement in the expanded multicenter US melody valve trial. Circulation. 2010;122:507–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Michelena HI, Alli O, Cabalka AK, Rihal CS. Successful percutaneous transvenous antegrade mitral valve-in-valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012. doi:10.1002/ccd.24423.

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Wilbring.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Valvular Heart Disease

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilbring, M., Alexiou, K., Tugtekin, SM. et al. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Therapies: Patient Selection, Prosthesis Assessment and Selection, Results, and Future Directions. Curr Cardiol Rep 15, 341 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-012-0341-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-012-0341-3

Keywords

Navigation