Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy: Value of Echocardiography

  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease in women during pregnancy poses particular challenges. It continues to be a leading cause of maternal mortality and contributes to significant morbidity. Echocardiography is essential in characterizing the extent and effects of heart disease prior to, during, and after pregnancy. By understanding the physiologic adaptation in pregnancy with increases in heart rate, blood volume, and cardiac output, and decrease in vascular resistance, one can anticipate and recognize the effects of these changes on various cardiac lesions. Cardiomyopathy, severe, obstructive valvular disease, aortic dilation due to Marfan’s disease, and cyanotic congenital heart disease are poorly tolerated in pregnancy. These disorders can be readily distinguished from normal structural changes of pregnancy and their severity assessed by echocardiography. Cardiovascular disease in women of reproductive age requires careful, multidisciplinary management by obstetric and medical teams ideally beginning preconception and continuing through the postpartum period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as follows: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases During Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology: Expert consensus document on management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J 2003, 24:761–781.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lund CJ, Donovan JC: Blood volume during pregnancy. Significance of plasma and red cell volumes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1967, 98:394–403.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Poppas A, Shroff SG, Korcarz CE, et al.: Serial assessment of the cardiovascular system in normal pregnancy. Role of arterial compliance and pulsatile arterial load. Circulation 1997, 95:2407–2415.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilson GJ, Samaan S, Crawford MH, et al.: Changes in hemodynamics, ventricular remodeling, and ventricular contractility during normal pregnancy: a longitudinal study. Obstet Gynecol 1997, 89:957–962.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Robson SC, Hunter S, Boys RJ, Dunlop W: Serial study of factors influencing changes in cardiac output during human pregnancy. Am J Physiol 1989, 256:H1060–H1065.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duvekot JJ, Cheriex EC, Pieters FA, et al.: Early pregnancy changes in hemodynamics and volume homeostasis are consecutive adjustments triggered by a primary fall in systemic vascular tone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993, 169:1382–1392.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Katz R, Karliner JS, Resnik R: Effects of a natural volume overload state (pregnancy) on left ventricular performance in normal human subjects. Circulation 1978, 58:434–441.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Capeless EL, Clapp JF: When do cardiovascular parameters return to their preconception values? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991, 165:883–886.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eghbali M, Deva R, Alioua A et al.: Molecular and functional signature of heart hypertrophy during pregnancy. Circ Res 2005, 96:1208–1216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Simmons LA, Gillin AG, Jeremy RW: Structural and functional changes in left ventricle during normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002, 283:H1627–H1633.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mone SM, Sanders SP, Colan SD: Control mechanisms for physiological hypertrophy of pregnancy. Circulation 1996, 94:667–672.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fok WY, Chan LY, Wong JT, et al.: Left ventricular diastolic function during normal pregnancy: assessment by spectral tissue Doppler imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006, 28:789–793.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mesa A, Jessurun C, Hernandez A, et al.: Left ventricular diastolic function in normal human pregnancy. Circulation 1999, 99:511–517.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. • Bamfo JE, Kametas NA, Nicolaides KH, Chambers JB: Reference ranges for tissue Doppler measures of maternal systolic and diastolic left ventricular function. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007, 29:414–420. This well-done study provides normative values to use when assessing ventricular systolic and diastolic function in pregnancy.

  15. Campos O, Andrade JL, Bocanegra J, et al.: Physiologic multivalvular regurgitation during pregnancy: a longitudinal Doppler echocardiographic study. Int J Cardiol 1993, 40:265–272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abduljabbar HS, Marzouki KM, Zawawi TH, Khan AS: Pericardial effusion in normal pregnant women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991, 70:291–294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ristic AD, Seferovic PM, Ljubic A, et al.: Pericardial disease in pregnancy. Herz 2003, 28:209–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hibbard JU, Lindheimer M, Lang RM: A modified definition for peripartum cardiomyopathy and prognosis based on echocardiography. Obstet Gynecol 1999, 94:311–316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pearson GD, Veille JC, Rahimtoola S, et al.: Peripartum cardiomyopathy: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Office of Rare Diseases (National Institutes of Health) workshop recommendations and review. JAMA 2000, 283:1183–1188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Elkayam U, Akhter MW, Singh H, et al.: Pregnancy-associated cardiomyopathy: clinical characteristics and a comparison between early and late presentation. Circulation 2005, 111:2050–2055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Amos AM, Jaber WA, Russell SD: Improved outcomes in peripartum cardiomyopathy with contemporary. Am Heart J 2006, 152:509–513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chapa JB, Heiberger HB, Weinert L, et al.: Prognostic value of echocardiography in peripartum cardiomyopathy. Obstet Gynecol 2005, 105:1303–1308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. •• Habli M, O’Brien T, Nowack E, et al.: Peripartum cardiomyopathy: prognostic factors for long-term maternal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008, 199:415.e1–415.e5. This recent, large case series of patients with PPCM provides updated morbidity and mortality data that can be used to assess patients and prognosticate.

  24. Duran N, Gunes H, Duran I, et al.: Predictors of prognosis in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008, 101:137–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Elkayam U, Tummala PP, Rao K, et al.: Maternal and fetal outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in women with peripartum cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2001, 344:1567–1571.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dorbala S, Brozena S, Zeb S, et al.: Risk stratification of women with peripartum cardiomyopathy at initial presentation: a dobutamine stress echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005, 18:45–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lampert MB, Weinert L, Hibbard J, et al.: Contractile reserve in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy and recovered left ventricular function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997, 176:189–195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsiaras S, Poppas A: Mitral valve disease in pregnancy: outcomes and management. Obstet Med 2009, 2:6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rokey R, Hsu HW, Moise KJJ, et al.: Inaccurate noninvasive mitral valve area calculation during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1994, 84:950–955.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Esteves CA, Munoz JS, Braga S, et al.: Immediate and long-term follow-up of percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty in pregnant patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2006, 98:812–816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Abascal VM, Wilkins GT, O’Shea JP, et al.: Prediction of successful outcome in 130 patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy. Circulation 1990, 82:448–456.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stoddard MF, Longaker RA, Vuocolo LM, Dawkins PR: Transesophageal echocardiography in the pregnant patient. Am Heart J 1992, 124:785–787.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lesniak-Sobelga A, Tracz W, KostKiewicz M, et al.: Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of pregnant women with valvular heart diseases—maternal and fetal outcome. Int J Cardiol 2004, 94:15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al.: ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:e1–e148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chan WS, Anand S, Ginsberg JS: Anticoagulation of pregnant women with mechanical heart valves: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Intern Med 2000, 160:191–196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Goland S, Barakat M, Khatri N, Elkayam U: Pregnancy in Marfan syndrome: maternal and fetal risk and recommendations for patient assessment and management. Cardiol Rev 2009, 17:253–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Weiss BM, Zemp L, Seifert B, Hess OM: Outcome of pulmonary vascular disease in pregnancy: a systematic overview from 1978 through 1996. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998, 31:1650–1657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Weiss BM, Hess OM: Pulmonary vascular disease and pregnancy: current controversies, management strategies, and perspectives. Eur Heart J 2000, 21:104–115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. •• Drenthen W, Pieper PG, Roos-Hesselink JW, et al.: Outcome of pregnancy in women with congenital heart disease: a literature review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:2303–2311. This well-researched and well-written state-of-the-art paper presents the compilation of published reports in clear and accessible tables to help assess individual maternal and fetal risk in pregnancy complicated by heart disease.

  40. Siu SC, Sermer M, Colman JM, et al.: Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease. Circulation 2001, 104:515–521.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Elkayam U, Bitar F: Valvular heart disease and pregnancy part I: native valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:223–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Echocardiography Laboratory, Rhode Island Hospital/Brown Medical School, 593 Eddy Street, Main Building, Room 209, Providence, RI, 02809, USA

    Sarah Tsiaras & Athena Poppas

Authors
  1. Sarah Tsiaras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Athena Poppas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Athena Poppas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsiaras, S., Poppas, A. Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy: Value of Echocardiography. Curr Cardiol Rep 12, 250–256 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-010-0106-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-010-0106-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation