Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sustainable Diets for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Management

  • Nutrition (K. Petersen, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Healthy dietary patterns are recommended for prevention of cardiovascular disease, which remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. In this review, we discuss dietary patterns that are not only optimal for CVD prevention and management but also sustainable in maximizing health, environmental, and economic benefits.

Recent Findings

The growing literature on sustainable diets in the context of environmental sustainability includes subtopics of climate change, land use, biodiversity loss, freshwater use, and reactive nitrogen emissions. Similarly, economic sustainability, beyond the retail cost of food, extends to healthcare costs and the economic costs of environmental destruction related to current agricultural practices and food choices.

Summary

Dietary patterns that are high in plant foods and low in animal foods could maximize health, environmental, and economic benefits; however, questions remain about how to best promote these patterns to achieve wider adoption in an environmentally and economically sustainable way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Roth GA, Johnson C, Abajobir A, Abd-Allah F, Abera SF, Abyu G, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.052.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141:E139–596. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(10):e177–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025. 9th Edition. https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov. December (2020). Accessed 27 Jan 2021.

  5. Van Horn L, Carson JAS, Appel LJ, Burke LE, Economos C, Karmally W, et al. Recommended dietary pattern to achieve adherence to the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134(22):e505–e29. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000462.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tapsell LC, Neale EP, Satija A, Hu FB. Foods, nutrients, and dietary patterns: interconnections and implications for dietary guidelines. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(3):445–54. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.011718.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Neuhouser ML. The importance of healthy dietary patterns in chronic disease prevention. Nutr Res. 2019;70:3–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2018.06.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sofi F, Abbate R, Gensini GF, Casini A. Accruing evidence on benefits of adherence to the Mediterranean diet on health: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92(5):1189–96. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2010.29673.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. • Galbete C, Schwingshackl L, Schwedhelm C, Boeing H, Schulze MB. Evaluating Mediterranean diet and risk of chronic disease in cohort studies: An umbrella review of meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(10):909–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0427-3Umbrella review of meta-analyses evaluating the Mediterranean diet and risk of chronic disease from cohort studies.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosato V, Temple NJ, La Vecchia C, Castellan G, Tavani A, Guercio V. Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Nutr. 2019;58(1):173–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-017-1582-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Almaraz M, Bai E, Wang C, Trousdell J, Conley S, Faloona I et al. Agriculture is a major source of NOx pollution in California. Sci Adv. 2018:4(1). doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao3477.

  12. Popkin BM, Kim S, Rusev ER, Du S, Zizza C. Measuring the full economic costs of diet, physical activity and obesity-related chronic diseases. Obes Rev. 2006;7(3):271–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00230.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Scientific report of the 2015 Dietary guidelines advisory committee: advisory report to the secretary of health and human services and the secretary of agriculture. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service; 2015.

  14. Nelson ME, Hamm MW, Hu FB, Abrams SA, Griffin TS. Alignment of healthy dietary patterns and environmental sustainability: a systematic review. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(6):1005–25. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.116.012567.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Reinhardt SL, Boehm R, Blackstone NT, El-Abbadi NH, Brandow JSM, Taylor SF, et al. Systematic review of dietary patterns and sustainability in the United States. Adv Nutr. 2020;11(4):1016–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmaa026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones AD, Hoey L, Blesh J, Miller L, Green A, Shapiro LF. A systematic review of the measurement of sustainable diets. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(4):641–64. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.011015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chareonrungrueangchai K, Wongkawinwoot K, Anothaisintawee T, Reutrakul S. Dietary factors and risks of cardiovascular diseases: an umbrella review. Nutrients. 2020;12(4):1088.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Reedy J, Lerman JL, Krebs-Smith SM, Kirkpatrick SI, Pannucci TE, Wilson MM, et al. Evaluation of the healthy eating index-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(9):1622–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fung TT, Hu FB, McCullough ML, Newby PK, Willett WC, Holmes MD. Diet quality is associated with the risk of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Nutr. 2006;136(2):466–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.2.466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Satija A, Bhupathiraju SN, Rimm EB, Spiegelman D, Chiuve SE, Borgi L et al. Plant-based dietary patterns and incidence of type 2 diabetes in US men and women: results from three prospective cohort studies. PLoS Med. 2016:13(6). doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002039.

  21. McCullough ML, Feskanich D, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci EL, Rimm EB, Hu FB, et al. Diet quality and major chronic disease risk in men and women: moving toward improved dietary guidance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(6):1261–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/76.6.1261.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shan Z, Li Y, Baden MY, Bhupathiraju SN, Wang DD, Sun Q, et al. Association between healthy eating patterns and risk of cardiovascular disease. JAMA Inter Med. 2020;180(8):1090–100. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang DD, Li Y, Chiuve SE, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Rimm EB, et al. Association of specific dietary fats with total and cause-specific mortality. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(8):1134–45. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2417.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Li Y, Hruby A, Bernstein AM, Ley SH, Wang DD, Chiuve SE, et al. Saturated fats compared with unsaturated fats and sources of carbohydrates in relation to risk of coronary heart disease: a prospective cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(14):1538–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.055.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sacks FM, Lichtenstein AH, Wu JH, Appel LJ, Creager MA, Kris-Etherton PM, et al. Dietary fats and cardiovascular disease: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136(3):e1–e23. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim Y, Je Y. Dietary fibre intake and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all cancers: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;109(1):39–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2015.09.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Reynolds A, Mann J, Cummings J, Winter N, Mete E, Te Morenga L. Carbohydrate quality and human health: a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Lancet. 2019;393(10170):434–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31809-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McRae MP. Dietary fiber is beneficial for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. J Chiropr Med. 2017;16(4):289–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2017.05.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. da Silveira Vasconcelos M, de Oliveira LMN, Mota EF, de Siqueira Oliveira L, Gomes-Rochette NF, Nunes-Pinheiro DCS et al. Consumption of rich/enrich phytonutrients food and their relationship with health status of population. In: Nabavi SM, Suntar I, Barreca D, Khan H, editors. Phytonutrients in Food. Woodhead Publishing; 2020. p. 67-101.

  30. Sun J, Buys N. Effects of probiotics consumption on lowering lipids and CVD risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Med. 2015;47(6):430–40. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890.2015.1071872.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Singh RK, Chang H-W, Yan D, Lee KM, Ucmak D, Wong K, et al. Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health. J Transl Med. 2017;15(1):73–1359. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Stanner S, Coe S, Frayn KN. Cardiovascular disease: diet, nutrition and emerging risk factors. John Wiley & Sons; 2018.

  33. Eichelmann F, Schwingshackl L, Fedirko V, Aleksandrova K. Effect of plant-based diets on obesity-related inflammatory profiles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention trials. Obes Rev. 2016;17(11):1067–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. • Zhong VW, Van Horn L, Greenland P, Carnethon MR, Ning H, Wilkins JT, et al. Associations of processed meat, unprocessed red meat, poultry, or fish intake with incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(4):503–12. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6969Within a cohort study, intake of processed meat, unprocessed red meat, or poultry was significantly associated with incident cardiovascular disease, but fish intake was not.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Raatz SK, Silverstein JT, Jahns L, Picklo MJ. Issues of fish consumption for cardiovascular disease risk reduction. Nutrients. 2013;5(4):1081–97. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5041081.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kris-Etherton PM, Harris WS, Appel LJ. Fish consumption, fish oil, omega-3 fatty acids, and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2002;106(21):2747–57. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000038493.65177.94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bradley MA, Barst BD, Basu N. A review of mercury bioavailability in humans and fish. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(2):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14020169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Domingo JL. Nutrients and chemical pollutants in fish and shellfish. Balancing health benefits and risks of regular fish consumption. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016;56(6):979–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.742985.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Medawar E, Huhn S, Villringer A, Witte AV. The effects of plant-based diets on the body and the brain: a systematic review. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9:226. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0552-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ratjen I, Morze J, Enderle J, Both M, Borggrefe J, Muller HP, et al. Adherence to a plant-based diet in relation to adipose tissue volumes and liver fat content. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;112(2):354–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Friel S, Dangour AD, Garnett T, Lock K, Chalabi Z, Roberts I, et al. Health and climate change 4 public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: food and agriculture. Lancet. 2009;374(9706):2016–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61753-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. McMichael AJ, Woodruff RE, Hales S. Climate change and human health: present and future risks. Lancet. 2006;367(9513):859–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68079-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockstrom J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science. 2015:347(6223). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.

  44. Rockstrom J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature. 2009;461(7263):472–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. •• Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 2019;393(10170):447–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4Landmark EAT-Lancet Commission report provides a comprehensive review of what constitutes a universally healthy diet from a sustainable food system perspective with recommendations and framework to support and speed up food system transformation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. •• Springmann M, Clark M, Mason-D'Croz D, Wiebe K, Bodirsky BL, Lassaletta L, et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature. 2018;562(7728):519–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0Review analyzes options for reducing environmental efforts of the food system, including dietary changes towards healthier, more plant-based diets, improvements in technologies and management, and reductions in food loss and waste.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J et al. Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); 2013.

  48. Westhoek H, Lesschen JP, Rood T, Wagner S, De Marco A, Murphy-Bokern D, et al. Food choices, health and environment: effects of cutting Europe's meat and dairy intake. Glob Environ Chang. 2014;26:196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Goldewijk KK. Estimating global land use change over the past 300 years: the HYDE database. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2001;15(2):417–33. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gb001232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Abell R, Brooks TM, Gittleman JL, Joppa LN et al. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science. 2014:344(6187). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246752.

  51. Machovina B, Feeley KJ, Ripple WJ. Biodiversity conservation: the key is reducing meat consumption. Sci Total Environ. 2015;536:419–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Eshel G, Shepon A, Noor E, Milo R. Environmentally optimal, nutritionally aware beef replacement plant-based diets. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(15):8164–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM. The water footprint of humanity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(9):3232–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109936109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY. A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems. 2012;15(3):401–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9517-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Erisman JW, Galloway JN, Dise NB, Sutton MA, Bleeker A, Grizzetti B, et al. Nitrogen: too much of a vital resource. WWF Netherlands: Zeist, The Netherlands; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Katz DL, Doughty KN, Geagan K, Jenkins DA, Gardner CD. Perspective: the public health case for modernizing the definition of protein quality. Adv Nutr. 2019;10(5):755–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmz023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. •• Gardner CD, Hartle JC, Garrett RD, Offringa LC, Wasserman AS. Maximizing the intersection of human health and the health of the environment with regard to the amount and type of protein produced and consumed in the United States. Nutr Rev. 2019;77(4):197–215. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuy073Review provides an evaluation of current national dietary guidelines to evaluate the impacts of reasonable shifts in amount and type of protein intake on the intersection of human and environmental health.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Eshel G, Shepon A, Makov T, Milo R. Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(33):11996–2001. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402183111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Scrafford CG, Bi X, Multani JK, Murphy MM, Schmier JK, Barraj LM. Health economic evaluation modeling shows potential health care cost savings with increased conformance with healthy dietary patterns among adults in the United States. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019;119(4):599–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2018.10.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Jones JP, Abdullah MM, Wood D, Jones PJ. Economic modeling for improved prediction of saving estimates in healthcare costs from consumption of healthy foods: the Mediterranean-style diet case study. Food Nutr Res. 2019:63. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v63.3418.

  61. • Jardim TV, Mozaffarian D, Abrahams-Gessel S, Sy S, Lee Y, Liu J, et al. Cardiometabolic disease costs associated with suboptimal diet in the United States: a cost analysis based on a microsimulation model. PLoS Med. 2019;16(12):e1002981. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002981A microsimulation model estimated greater than 18 percent of 1-year cardiometabolic disease costs were associated with suboptimal diet.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Diaz D, Moore F. Quantifying the economic risks of climate change. Nat Clim Chang. 2017;7(11):774–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hsiang S, Kopp R, Jina A, Rising J, Delgado M, Mohan S, et al. Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. Science. 2017;356(6345):1362–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Watts N, Amann M, Ayeb-Karlsson S, Belesova K, Bouley T, Boykoff M, et al. The Lancet countdown on health and climate change: from 25 years of inaction to a global transformation for public health. Lancet. 2018;391(10120):581–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32464-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Dittrich R, McCallum S. How to measure the economic health cost of wildfires - a systematic review of the literature for northern America. Int J Wildland Fire. 2020;29(11):961–73. https://doi.org/10.1071/wf19091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Drewnowski A, Eichelsdoerfer P. The Mediterranean diet: does it have to cost more? Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(9A):1621–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980009990462.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Headey DD, Alderman HH. The relative caloric prices of healthy and unhealthy foods differ systematically across income levels and continents. J Nutr. 2019;149(11):2020–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxz158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Contribution of food prices and diet cost to socioeconomic disparities in diet quality and health: a systematic review and analysis. Nutr Rev. 2015;73(10):643–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuv027.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Rehm CD, Monsivais P, Drewnowski A. The quality and monetary value of diets consumed by adults in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(5):1333–9. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.015560.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Murakami K, Sasaki S, Takahashi Y, Uenishi K. Monetary cost of dietary energy is negatively associated with BMI and waist circumference, but not with other metabolic risk factors, in young Japanese women. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(8):1092–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980008004266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Rydén PJ, Hagfors L. Diet cost, diet quality and socio-economic position: how are they related and what contributes to differences in diet costs? Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(9):1680–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980010003642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Drewnowski A, Darmon N. Food choices and diet costs: an economic analysis. J Nutr. 2005;135(4):900–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.4.900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. de Boer J, Schösler H, Aiking H. “Meatless days” or “less but better”? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges. Appetite. 2014;76:120–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Spencer M, Cienfuegos C, Guinard J-X. The Flexitarian Flip™ in university dining venues: student and adult consumer acceptance of mixed dishes in which animal protein has been partially replaced with plant protein. Food Qual Prefer. 2018;68:50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. The Monday Campaigns. Meatless Monday. https://www.mondaycampaigns.org/meatless-monday (2020). Accessed 1 Nov 2020.

  76. The Culinary Institute of America. The protein flip: a delicious strategy for change. https://www.menusofchange.org/images/uploads/pdf/CIA-MenusOfChange_ProteinFlip_(May_2016)2.pdf (2016.). Accessed November 1, 2020.

  77. Shepherd R. Resistance to changes in diet. Proc Nutr Soc. 2002;61(2):267–72. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2002147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. •• Monterrosa EC, Frongillo EA, Drewnowski A, de Pee S, Vandevijvere S. Sociocultural influences on food choices and implications for sustainable healthy diets. Food Nutr Bull. 2020;41(2_suppl):59S–73S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0379572120975874Review provides the most up-to-date literature regarding sociocultural influences on food practices as precursors to food policy decisions.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Yu E, Malik VS, Hu FB. Cardiovascular disease prevention by diet modification: JACC health promotion series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(8):914–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.085.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Kris-Etherton PM, Petersen KS, Velarde G, Barnard ND, Miller M, Ros E, et al. Barriers, opportunities, and challenges in addressing disparities in diet-related cardiovascular disease in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(7):e014433. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014433.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Macdiarmid JI, Douglas F, Campbell J. Eating like there's no tomorrow: public awareness of the environmental impact of food and reluctance to eat less meat as part of a sustainable diet. Appetite. 2016;96:487–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. •• Graca J, Godinho CA, Truninger M. Reducing meat consumption and following plant-based diets: current evidence and future directions to inform integrated transitions. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2019;91:380–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.046Systematic review maps potential barriers and enablers in terms of capability, opportunity, and motivation to reduced meat consumption and follow more plant-based diets.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Desroches S, Lapointe A, Ratte S, Gravel K, Legare F, Turcotte S. Interventions to enhance adherence to dietary advice for preventing and managing chronic diseases in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2:CD008722. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008722.pub2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Matson-Koffman DM, Brownstein JN, Neiner JA, Greaney ML. A site-specific literature review of policy and environmental interventions that promote physical activity and nutrition for cardiovascular health: What works? Am J Health Promot. 2005;19(3):167–93. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-19.3.167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Ghvanidze S, Velikova N, Dodd T, Oldewage-Theron W. A discrete choice experiment of the impact of consumers' environmental values, ethical concerns, and health consciousness on food choices A cross-cultural analysis. Br Food J. 2017;119(4):863–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-07-2016-0342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Hekler EB, Gardner CD, Robinson TN. Effects of a college course about food and society on students' eating behaviors. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(5):543–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. • Turnwald BP, Bertoldo JD, Perry MA, Policastro P, Timmons M, Bosso C, et al. Increasing vegetable intake by emphasizing tasty and enjoyable attributes: a randomized controlled multisite intervention for taste-focused labeling. Psychol Sci. 2019;30(11):1603–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619872191Labels emphasizing tasty and enjoyable attributes of foods compared to labels containing positive words, fancy words, or list of ingredients increased vegetable intake in real-world settings.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. de Boer J, Aiking H. Pursuing a low meat diet to improve both health and sustainability: how can we use the frames that shape our meals? Ecol Econ. 2017;142:238–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. De Dominicis S, Schultz PW, Bonaiuto M. Protecting the environment for self-interested reasons: altruism is not the only pathway to sustainability. Front Psychol. 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01065.

  90. King AC, Ahn DF, Atienza AA, Kraemer HC. Exploring refinements in targeted behavioral medicine intervention to advance public health. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35(3):251–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9032-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. King AC. Behavioral medicine in the 21st century: transforming "the road less traveled" into the "American way of life". Ann Behav Med. 2014;47(1):71–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9530-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Milner J, Green R. Sustainable diets are context specific but are they realistic? Lancet Planet Health. 2018;2(10):e425–e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30207-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Wezel A, Casagrande M, Celette F, Vian JF, Ferrer A, Peigne J. Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review Agron Sustain Dev. 2014;34(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0180-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Walter A, Finger R, Huber R, Buchmann N. Smart farming is key to developing sustainable agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(24):6148–50. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707462114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. • He J, Evans NM, Liu H, Shao S. A review of research on plant-based meat alternatives: Driving forces, history, manufacturing, and consumer attitudes. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020;19(5):2639–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12610An up-to-date review of literature on plant-based meat alternatives regarding driving forces for development, history of progression and manufacturing, and consumer attitudes.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Chriki S, Hocquette J-F. The myth of cultured meat: a review. Front Nutr. 2020;7:7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Fraeye I, Kratka M, Vandenburgh H, Thorrez L. Sensorial and nutritional aspects of cultured meat in comparison to traditional meat: much to be inferred. Front Nutr. 2020;7:35. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Hu FB, Otis BO, McCarthy G. Can plant-based meat alternatives be part of a healthy and sustainable diet? JAMA. 2019;322(16):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.13187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Sweeney E. Are beyond meat and impossible burgers better for you? Nutritionists Weigh In. Huffington Post; 2019. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/beyond-meat-impossible-burger-healthy_l_5d164ad1e4b07f6ca57cc3ed. Accessed 22 Sept 2019.

  100. Hemler EC, Hu FB. Plant-based diets for cardiovascular disease prevention: all plant foods are not created equal. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019;21(5):18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-019-0779-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Moubarac J-C, Levy RB, Louzada MLC, Jaime PC. The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(1):5–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017000234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Crimarco A, Springfield S, Petlura C, Streaty T, Cunanan K, Lee J, et al. A randomized crossover trial on the effect of plant-based compared with animal-based meat on trimethylamine-N-oxide and cardiovascular disease risk factors in generally healthy adults: study with appetizing plantfood—meat eating alternative trial (SWAP-MEAT). Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;112(5):1188–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Anderson CA, Bradley R. The potential of novel plant protein foods to improve dietary patterns and markers of cardiovascular health. Oxford University Press; 2020.

  104. Gonzalez Fischer C, Garnett T. Plates, pyramids and planets. Developments in national healthy and sustainable dietary guidelines: a state of play assessment. The university of Oxford: food and agriculture organization of the United Nations and the food climate research network; 2016.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a training grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [T32 HL007034].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher D. Gardner.

Ethics declarations

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Gardner reports other funding from Beyond Meat (Research Gift Funds that were used to

conduct a comparison of plant-based meat vs. red meat for CVD risk factor outcomes), outside the submitted work.

The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Nutrition

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mendoza-Vasconez, A.S., Landry, M.J., Crimarco, A. et al. Sustainable Diets for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Management. Curr Atheroscler Rep 23, 31 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-021-00929-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-021-00929-0

Keywords

Navigation