Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Role of C-Reactive Protein as a Risk Predictor of Coronary Atherosclerosis: Implications from the JUPITER Trial

  • Published:
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much controversy surrounds the use of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a marker of cardiovascular (CV) risk. Although data regarding the association of hs-CRP with CV disease is extensive and consistent, its role in clinical practice remains unclear. The American Heart Association (AHA) recently published a scientific statement regarding criteria for evaluation of novel markers of CV risk. This article provides a comprehensive review of data regarding hs-CRP as a risk marker for CV disease in the context of these AHA criteria. The impact of the JUPITER trial on the utility of hs-CRP as a risk marker is emphasized. The review concludes with an evidence-based statement regarding the current role of hs-CRP in CV risk prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Berk B, Weintraub W, Alexander R. Elevation of C-reactive protein in active coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65(3):168–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liuzzo G, Biasucci L, Gallimore J, Grillo R, Rebuzzi A, Pepys M, et al. The prognostic value of C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A protein in severe unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(7):417.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook NR, Buring JE, Ridker PM. The effect of including C-reactive protein in cardiovascular risk prediction models for women. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(1):21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ridker PM. C-reactive protein and the prediction of cardiovascular events among those at intermediate risk: moving an inflammatory hypothesis toward consensus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(21):2129–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. •• Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FAH, Genest J, Gotto Jr AM, Kastelein JJP, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(21):2195. This is the main article of the JUPITER study. It showed the rosuvastatin therapy in those “apparently” healthy population with elevated hs-CRP of >2 mg/L and low LDL (<130 mg/dL) had decreased cardiovascular risk with the use of rosuvastatin.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hlatky MA, Greenland P, Arnett DK, Ballantyne CM, Criqui MH, Elkind MSV, et al. Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2009;119(17):2408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. • Bajpai A, Goyal A, Sperling L. Should we measure C-reactive protein on Earth or just on JUPITER? Clin Cardiol. 2010;33(4):190–8. This article provides a comprehensive review of the data regarding cardiovascular risk and hs-CRP with an emphasis on the JUPITER trial .It concludes with an evidence-based analysis of the role of hs-CRP in cardiovascular risk assessment.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirschfield G, Pepys M. C-reactive protein and cardiovascular disease: new insights from an old molecule. QJM. 2003;96(11):793.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kushner I. C-reactive protein and the acute-phase response. Hosp Pract (Off ed). 1990;25(3):13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(6):448.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vigushin D, Pepys M, Hawkins P. Metabolic and scintigraphic studies of radioiodinated human C-reactive protein in health and disease. J Clin Investig. 1993;91:1351–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. De Beer F, Soutar A, Baltz M, Trayner I, Feinstein A, Pepys M. Low density lipoprotein and very low density lipoprotein are selectively bound by aggregated C-reactive protein. J Exp Med. 1982;156(1):230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pepys M, Rowe I, Baltz M. C-reactive protein: binding to lipids and lipoproteins. Int Rev Exp Pathol. 1985;27:83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang M, Binder C, Torzewski M, Witztum J. C-reactive protein binds to both oxidized LDL and apoptotic cells through recognition of a common ligand: phosphorylcholine of oxidized phospholipids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(20):13043.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vigo C. Effect of C-reactive protein on platelet-activating factor-induced platelet aggregation and membrane stabilization. J Biol Chem. 1985;260(6):3418.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Volanakis J, Narkates A. Binding of human C4 to C-reactive protein-pneumococcal C-polysaccharide complexes during activation of the classical complement pathway. Mol Immunol. 1983;20(11):1201–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Y, Cliff W, Schoefl G, Higgins G. Coronary C-reactive protein distribution: its relation to development of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1999;145(2):375–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nordestgaard BG, Zacho J. Lipids, atherosclerosis and CVD risk: Is CRP an innocent bystander? Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;19(8):521–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Casas J, Shah T, Hingorani A, Danesh J, Pepys M. C-reactive protein and coronary heart disease: a critical review. J Intern Med. 2008;264(4):295–314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. •• Zacho J, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Jensen JS, Grande P, Sillesen H, Nordestgaard BG. Genetically elevated C-reactive protein and ischemic vascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(18):1897. This landmark genetic study showed that polymorphisms in the CRP gene are associated with marked increases in CRP levels but with no increase risk of ischemic vascular disease.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Danesh J, Wheeler JG, Hirschfield GM, Eda S, Eiriksdottir G, Rumley A, et al. C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(14):1387.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Buckley DI, Fu R, Freeman M, Rogers K, Helfand M. C-reactive protein as a risk factor for coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analyses for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(7):483.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Lowe G, Pepys MB, Thompson SG, Collins R. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. C-reactive protein concentration and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:132–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. May M, Lawlor D, Brindle P, Patel R, Ebrahim S. Cardiovascular disease risk assessment in older women: can we improve on Framingham? British Women’s Heart and Health prospective cohort study. Br Med J. 2006;92(10):1396.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cook NR. Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation. 2007;115(7):928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cao J, Arnold A, Manolio T, Polak J, Psaty B, Hirsch C, et al. Association of carotid artery intima-media thickness, plaques, and C-reactive protein with future cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Circulation. 2007;116(1):32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sattar N, Murray H, McConnachie A, Blauw G, Bollen E, Buckley B, et al. C-reactive protein and prediction of coronary heart disease and global vascular events in the Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER). Circulation. 2007;115(8):981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shlipak M, Fried L, Cushman M, Manolio T, Peterson D, Stehman-Breen C, et al. Cardiovascular mortality risk in chronic kidney disease: comparison of traditional and novel risk factors. JAMA. 2005;293(14):1737.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilson PWF, Nam BH, Pencina M, D’Agostino Sr RB, Benjamin EJ, O’Donnell CJ. C-reactive protein and risk of cardiovascular disease in men and women from the Framingham Heart Study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(21):2473.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rutter M, Meigs J, Sullivan L, Sr D’Agostino R, Wilson P. C-reactive protein, the metabolic syndrome, and prediction of cardiovascular events in the Framingham Offspring Study. Circulation. 2004;110(4):380.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Koenig W, Lowel H, Baumert J, Meisinger C. C-reactive protein modulates risk prediction based on the Framingham Score: implications for future risk assessment: results from a large cohort study in southern Germany. Circulation. 2004;109(11):1349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Janes H, Pepe M, Gu W. Assessing the value of risk predictions by using risk stratification tables. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(10):751.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. •• Pencina MJ, D’Agostino Sr RB, Jr D’Agostino RB, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med. 2008;27(2):157–72. This article intoduces the Net Reclassification Index (NRI) as a novel way of measuring the additive effect of a variable to a model in reclassifying individuals to different risk category.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hosmer D, Lemesbow S. Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. Commun Stat-Theory Methods. 1980;9(10):1043–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wilson P, Pencina M, Jacques P, Selhub J, Sr D’Agostino R, O’Donnell C. C-reactive protein and reclassification of cardiovascular risk in the Framingham Heart Study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2008;1(2):92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cook N. Comments on ‘Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond’ by MJ Pencina et al., Statistics in Medicine (DOI. Stat Med. 2008;27(2):191–5.

  37. Shah T, Casas JP, Cooper JA, Tzoulaki I, Sofat R, McCormack V, et al. Critical appraisal of CRP measurement for the prediction of coronary heart disease events: new data and systematic review of 31 prospective cohorts. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38:217–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McMurray J, Kjekshus J, Gullestad L, Dunselman P, Hjalmarson A, Wedel H, et al. Effects of statin therapy according to plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentration in the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in Heart Failure (CORONA): a retrospective analysis. Circulation. 2009;120(22):2188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Clearfield M, Downs JR, Weis SE, Miles JS, et al. Measurement of C-reactive protein for the targeting of statin therapy in the primary prevention of acute coronary events. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(26):1959.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Spatz ES, Canavan ME, Desai MM. From here to JUPITER: identifying new patients for statin therapy using data from the 1999–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(1):41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee K, Cipriano L, Owens D, Go A, Hlatky M. Cost-Effectiveness of Using High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein to Identify Intermediate-and Low-Cardiovascular-Risk Individuals for Statin Therapy. Circulation. 2010;122:1478–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Slejko JF, Page 2nd RL, Sullivan PW. Cost-effectiveness of statin therapy for vascular event prevention in adults with elevated C-reactive protein: implications of JUPITER. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26(10):2485–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mihaylova B, Briggs A, Hlatky M, Armitage J, Parish S, Gray A, et al. Statin cost-effectiveness in the United States for people at different vascular risk levels. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(2):65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pletcher M, Lazar L, Bibbins-Domingo K, Moran A, Rodondi N, Coxson P, et al. Comparing impact and cost-effectiveness of primary prevention strategies for lipid-lowering. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(4):243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hayward R, Krumholz H, Zulman D, Timbie J, Vijan S. Optimizing statin treatment for primary prevention of coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(2):69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. •• Kappagoda CT, Amsterdam EA. Another look at the results of the JUPITER trial. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104(11):1603–5. This articles analyzes the methodology and results of the JUPITER study. It shows significant epidemiologic and methodologic inconsistencies in the JUPITER study that warrant consideration. The article emphasizes that the study population was not a healthy population and that standard medical care was not provided to the population that could have changed the result of the study significantly.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gibbons R, Fugh-Berman A, Chan P, Nallamothu B, Hayward R, Jenny-Avital E, et al. Rosuvastatin in patients with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(10):1038.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. • Sattar N, Preiss D, Murray H, Welsh P, Buckley B, de Craen A, Seshasai S, McMurray J, Freeman D, Jukema J. Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials. Lancet 2010. This study is a meta-analysis of the risk of diabetes mellitus with statin therapy. It concludes that statin therapy is associated with a slightly increased risk of development of diabetes, but the risk is low.

Download references

Disclosure

The authors report no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Dr. Antonio Gotto, Editor-in-Chief of Current Atherosclerosis Reports, reviewed this article and provided comments and suggestions. He was a member of the JUPITER Steering Committee, for which he received honoraria, and has served as a consultant for AstraZeneca. He has no financial relationship with the manufacturer of the hs-CRP test.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurence Sperling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abd, T.T., Eapen, D.J., Bajpai, A. et al. The Role of C-Reactive Protein as a Risk Predictor of Coronary Atherosclerosis: Implications from the JUPITER Trial. Curr Atheroscler Rep 13, 154–161 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-011-0164-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-011-0164-5

Keywords

Navigation