Skip to main content
Log in

Preferred quantization rules: Born–Jordan versus Weyl. The pseudo-differential point of view

  • Published:
Journal of Pseudo-Differential Operators and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has recently been evidence for replacing the usual Weyl quantization procedure by the older and much less known Born–Jordan rule. In this paper we discuss this quantization procedure in detail and relate it to recent results of Boggiato, De Donno, and Oliaro on the Cohen class. We begin with a discussion of some properties of Shubin’s τ-pseudo-differential calculus, which allows us to show that the Born–Jordan quantization of a symbol a is the average for \({\tau\in[0,1]}\) of the τ-operators with symbol a. We study the properties of the Born–Jordan operators, including their symplectic covariance, and give their Weyl symbol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boggiatto P., De Donno G., Oliaro A.: Time–frequency representations of Wigner type and pseudo-differential operators. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 362(9), 4955–4981 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Boggiatto P., Cuong B.K., De Donno G., Oliaro A.: Weighted integrals of Wigner representations. J. Pseudo-Differen. Oper. Appl. 1(4), 401–415 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Born M., Jordan P.: Zur Quantenmechanik. Zeits. Physik 34, 858–888 (1925)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Castellani L.: Quantization rules and Dirac’s correspondence. Il Nuovo Cimento 48A(3), 359–368 (1978)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Crehan P.: The parametrisation of quantisation rules equivalent to operator orderings, and the effect of different rules on the physical spectrum. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 22(7), 811–822 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Fedak W.A., Prentis J.J.: The 1925 Born and Jordan paper “On quantum mechanics”. Am. J. Phys. 77(2), 128–139 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. de Gosson, M.: Symplectic Geometry and Quantum Mechanics, Birkhäuser, Basel, series “Operator Theory: Advances and Applications” (subseries: “Advances in Partial Differential Equations”), vol. 166 (2006)

  8. de Gosson, M.: Symplectic methods in harmonic analysis. Appl. Math. Phys., Birkhäuser (2011, to appear)

  9. de Gosson, M., Hiley, B.: Imprints of the quantum world in classical mechanics. Preprint (2010)

  10. Gröchenig K.: Foundations of Time–Frequency Analysis. Birkhäuser, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kauffmann, S.K.: Unambiguous quantization from the maximum classical correspondence that is self-consistent: the slightly stronger canonical commutation rule Dirac missed. arXiv:0908.3024 (2010)

  12. Mackey, G.W.: The relationship between classical and quantum mechanics. In: Contemporary Mathematics 214, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (1998)

  13. Molahajloo S.: The heat kernel of the τ-twisted Laplacian. J. Pseudo-Differen. Oper. Appl. 1(3), 293–311 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Shubin, M.A.: Pseudodifferential Operators and Spectral Theory. Springer, Berlin (1987) [original Russian edition in Nauka, Moskva (1978)]

  15. Weyl H.: Quantenmechanik und Gruppentheorie. Zeitschrift für Physik 46, 1–46 (1927)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wong M.W.: Weyl Transforms. Springer, Berlin (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurice de Gosson.

Additional information

M. de Gosson was financed by the Austrian Research Agency FWF (Projektnummer P20442-N13).

F. Luef was financed by the Marie Curie Outgoing Fellowship PIOF 220464.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Gosson, M., Luef, F. Preferred quantization rules: Born–Jordan versus Weyl. The pseudo-differential point of view. J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl. 2, 115–139 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11868-011-0025-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11868-011-0025-6

Keywords

Navigation