Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Immunotherapy and Biomarkers in Sarcoma

  • Sarcoma (SH Okuno, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Sarcoma describes a rare and heterogeneous group of diseases. Current treatment options for metastatic sarcoma are quite limited. Conventional treatments with chemotherapy or anti-angiogenic agents result in a non-durable response and a survival rate of approximately 12 to 18 months. In addition, the benefits of such treatments remain limited in some sarcoma subtypes only. Immunotherapy is an emerging treatment for several cancer types with promising outcomes. Studies at the cellular level have shown a relatively high immunogenicity in some subtypes of sarcoma. It is therefore hypothesized that sarcoma may respond to immunotherapy. However, sarcoma is a heterogeneous disease and differences in terms of immunogenicity exist. A multitude of immune-based treatment approaches for sarcoma have been explored. This includes immune checkpoint inhibitors, therapeutic vaccines, and adoptive cell therapy. Single-agent immunotherapy has exhibited efficacy against some sarcoma subtypes, including alveolar soft-part sarcoma, angiosarcoma, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Combination immunotherapy appears superior to single-agent immunotherapy in terms of response, and several ongoing studies of immunotherapy using single/combination immune checkpoint inhibitors and combination with anti-angiogenesis have begun to report beneficial results. Predictive and prognostic biomarkers are also under active investigations, with particular interest in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes or high tumor mutational burden levels. However, the information is still limited and further studies are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable

Code availability

Not applicable

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Lyon. Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours WHO Classification of Tumors. 5th edition 2020.

  2. Brennan MF, Antonescu CR, Moraco N, Singer S. Lessons learned from the study of 10,000 patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg. 2014;260(3):416–21 discussion 21–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Judson I, Verweij J, Gelderblom H, Hartmann JT, Schoffski P, Blay JY, et al. Doxorubicin alone versus intensified doxorubicin plus ifosfamide for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(4):415–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Seddon B, Strauss SJ, Whelan J, Leahy M, Woll PJ, Cowie F, et al. Gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment in previously untreated advanced unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas (GeDDiS): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(10):1397–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Jones RL, Hensley ML, Schuetze SM, Staddon A, et al. Efficacy and safety of trabectedin or dacarbazine for metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after failure of conventional chemotherapy: results of a phase III randomized multicenter clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(8):786–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoffski P, Chawla S, Maki RG, Italiano A, Gelderblom H, Choy E, et al. Eribulin versus dacarbazine in previously treated patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma: a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10028):1629–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia-Del-Muro X, Lopez-Pousa A, Maurel J, Martin J, Martinez-Trufero J, Casado A, et al. Randomized phase II study comparing gemcitabine plus dacarbazine versus dacarbazine alone in patients with previously treated soft tissue sarcoma: a Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(18):2528–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garcia-Carbonero R, Supko JG, Maki RG, Manola J, Ryan DP, Harmon D, et al. Ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743) for chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: multicenter phase II and pharmacokinetic study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(24):5484–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Demetri GD, Chawla SP, von Mehren M, Ritch P, Baker LH, Blay JY, et al. Efficacy and safety of trabectedin in patients with advanced or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after failure of prior anthracyclines and ifosfamide: results of a randomized phase II study of two different schedules. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4188–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Laverdiere C, Kolb EA, Supko JG, Gorlick R, Meyers PA, Maki RG, et al. Phase II study of ecteinascidin 743 in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent osteosarcoma. Cancer. 2003;98(4):832–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yovine A, Riofrio M, Blay JY, Brain E, Alexandre J, Kahatt C, et al. Phase II study of ecteinascidin-743 in advanced pretreated soft tissue sarcoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(5):890–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawai A, Araki N, Sugiura H, Ueda T, Yonemoto T, Takahashi M, et al. Trabectedin monotherapy after standard chemotherapy versus best supportive care in patients with advanced, translocation-related sarcoma: a randomised, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(4):406–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. van der Graaf WT, Blay JY, Chawla SP, Kim DW, Bui-Nguyen B, Casali PG, et al. Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1879–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Butrynski JE, D’Adamo DR, Hornick JL, Dal Cin P, Antonescu CR, Jhanwar SC, et al. Crizotinib in ALK-rearranged inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(18):1727–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shaw AT, Kim DW, Mehra R, Tan DS, Felip E, Chow LQ, et al. Ceritinib in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(13):1189–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Judson I, Morden JP, Kilburn L, Leahy M, Benson C, Bhadri V, et al. Cediranib in patients with alveolar soft-part sarcoma (CASPS): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(7):1023–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. •• Tawbi HA, Burgess M, Bolejack V, Van Tine BA, Schuetze SM, Hu J, et al. Pembrolizumab in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma and bone sarcoma (SARC028): a multicentre, two-cohort, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(11):1493–50 This is the first phase II study of single immunotherapy in sarcoma that showed a response to treatment. The study also explored on biomarkers and immunogenicity of sarcoma.

  19. Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, Shah M, Shapira-Frommer R, Nakagawa K, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(10):1353–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexandrov LB, Nik-Zainal S, Wedge DC, Aparicio SA, Behjati S, Biankin AV, et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature. 2013;500(7463):415–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chalmers ZR, Connelly CF, Fabrizio D, Gay L, Ali SM, Ennis R, et al. Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden. Genome Med. 2017;9(1):34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Worley BS, van den Broeke LT, Goletz TJ, Pendleton CD, Daschbach EM, Thomas EK, et al. Antigenicity of fusion proteins from sarcoma-associated chromosomal translocations. Cancer Res. 2001;61(18):6868–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kakimoto T, Matsumine A, Kageyama S, Asanuma K, Matsubara T, Nakamura T, et al. Immunohistochemical expression and clinicopathological assessment of the cancer testis antigens NY-ESO-1 and MAGE-A4 in high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma. Oncol Lett. 2019;17(4):3937–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. D’Angelo SP, Shoushtari AN, Agaram NP, Kuk D, Qin LX, Carvajal RD, et al. Prevalence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression in the soft tissue sarcoma microenvironment. Hum Pathol. 2015;46(3):357–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sorbye SW, Kilvaer T, Valkov A, Donnem T, Smeland E, Al-Shibli K, et al. Prognostic impact of lymphocytes in soft tissue sarcomas. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e14611.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Petitprez F, de Reynies A, Keung EZ, Chen TW, Sun CM, Calderaro J, et al. B cells are associated with survival and immunotherapy response in sarcoma. Nature. 2020;577(7791):556–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Toulmonde M, Penel N, Adam J, Chevreau C, Blay JY, Le Cesne A, et al. Use of PD-1 targeting, macrophage infiltration, and IDO pathway activation in sarcomas: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(1):93–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. DuBois S, Demetri G. Markers of angiogenesis and clinical features in patients with sarcoma. Cancer. 2007;109(5):813–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Manzur M, Hamzah J, Ganss R. Modulation of the “blood-tumor” barrier improves immunotherapy. Cell Cycle. 2008;7(16):2452–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosin DL, Okusa MD. Dangers within: DAMP responses to damage and cell death in kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(3):416–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen DS, Mellman I. Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle. Immunity. 2013;39(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dustin ML. The immunological synapse. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(11):1023–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen L, Flies DB. Molecular mechanisms of T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(4):227–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Gladney GLBaWL. Immune escape mechanisms as a guide for cancer immunotherap. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(4):687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fu Y, Liu S, Zeng S, Shen H. From bench to bed: the tumor immune microenvironment and current immunotherapeutic strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):396.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang J, Yan J, Liu B. Targeting VEGF/VEGFR to modulate antitumor immunity. Front Immunol. 2018;9:978.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. LaFleur MW, Muroyama Y, Drake CG, Sharpe AH. Inhibitors of the PD-1 pathway in tumor therapy. J Immunol. 2018;200(2):375–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fyfe GA, Fisher RI, Rosenberg SA, Sznol M, Parkinson DR, Louie AC. Long-term response data for 255 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(8):2410–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rosenberg SA. IL-2: the first effective immunotherapy for human cancer. J Immunol. 2014;192(12):5451–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lissoni P, Barni S, Cattaneo G, Archili C, Crispino S, Tancini G, et al. Activation of the complement system during immunotherapy of cancer with interleukin-2: a possible explanation of the capillary leak syndrome. Int J Biol Markers. 1990;5(4):195–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sievers EL, Lange BJ, Sondel PM, Krailo MD, Gan J, Liu-Mares W, et al. Feasibility, toxicity, and biologic response of interleukin-2 after consolidation chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia: a report from the Children’s Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(3):914–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Baluna R, Vitetta ES. Vascular leak syndrome: a side effect of immunotherapy. Immunopharmacology. 1997;37(2-3):117–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Siegel JP, Puri RK. Interleukin-2 toxicity. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9(4):694–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schwinger W, Klass V, Benesch M, Lackner H, Dornbusch HJ, Sovinz P, et al. Feasibility of high-dose interleukin-2 in heavily pretreated pediatric cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(7):1199–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Maki RG, Jungbluth AA, Gnjatic S, Schwartz GK, D’Adamo DR, Keohan ML, et al. A pilot study of anti-CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab in patients with synovial sarcoma. Sarcoma. 2013;2013:168145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Merchant MS, Wright M, Baird K, Wexler LH, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Bernstein D, et al. Phase I clinical trial of ipilimumab in pediatric patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(6):1364–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ben-Ami E, Barysauskas CM, Solomon S, Tahlil K, Malley R, Hohos M, et al. Immunotherapy with single agent nivolumab for advanced leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: results of a phase 2 study. Cancer. 2017;123(17):3285–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Burgess MA, Bolejack V, Schuetze S, Tine BAV, Attia S, Riedel RF, et al. Clinical activity of pembrolizumab (P) in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and dedifferentiated/pleomorphic liposarcoma (LPS): final results of SARC028 expansion cohorts. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:11015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hodi FS, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, Robert C, Grossmann KF, McDermott DF, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: 2-year overall survival outcomes in a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(11):1558–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. • D’Angelo SP, Mahoney MR, Van Tine BA, Atkins J, Milhem MM, Jahagirdar BN, et al. Nivolumab with or without ipilimumab treatment for metastatic sarcoma (Alliance A091401): two open-label, non-comparative, randomised, phase 2 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(3):416–2. This is a major phase II study showing superiority of combination immunotherapy compared to single immunotherapy in advance sarcoma.

  51. Chen JL, Mahoney MR, George S, Antonescu CR, Liebner DA, Tine BAV, et al. A multicenter phase II study of nivolumab +/- ipilimumab for patients with metastatic sarcoma (Alliance A091401): results of expansion cohorts. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15):11511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. D’Angelo SP, Conley AP, Kelly CM, Dickson MA, Gounder MM, Chi P. Pilot study of NKTR214 and nivolumab in patients with sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:11010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rivera Vargas T, Apetoh L. Danger signals: Chemotherapy enhancers? Immunol Rev. 2017;280(1):175–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pollack SM, Redman MW, Baker KK, Wagner MJ, Schroeder BA, Loggers ET, et al. Assessment of doxorubicin and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced anthracycline-naive sarcoma: a phase 1/2 nonrandomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(11):1778–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wilky BA, Trucco MM, Subhawong TK, Florou V, Park W, Kwon D, et al. Axitinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced sarcomas including alveolar soft-part sarcoma: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(6):837–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Palmerini E, Lopez-Pousa A, Grignani G, Redondo A, Hindi N, Stacchiotti S. IMMUNOSARC: a collaborative Spanish (GEIS) and Italian (ISG) sarcoma groups phase I/II trial of sunitinib and nivolumab in advanced soft tissue and bone sarcoma: results from the phase II part, bone sarcoma cohort. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38.

  57. Andtbacka RH, Agarwala SS, Ollila DW, Hallmeyer S, Milhem M, Amatruda T, et al. Cutaneous head and neck melanoma in OPTiM, a randomized phase 3 trial of talimogene laherparepvec versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of unresected stage IIIB/IIIC/IV melanoma. Head Neck. 2016;38(12):1752–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Kelly CM, Antonescu CR, Bowler T, Munhoz R, Chi P, Dickson MA, et al. Objective response rate among patients with locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma treated with talimogene laherparepvec in combination with pembrolizumab: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(3):402–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND, Berger ER, Small EJ, Penson DF, et al. Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(5):411–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kawaguchi S, Wada T, Ida K, Sato Y, Nagoya S, Tsukahara T, et al. Phase I vaccination trial of SYT-SSX junction peptide in patients with disseminated synovial sarcoma. J Transl Med. 2005;3(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Kawaguchi S, Tsukahara T, Ida K, Kimura S, Murase M, Kano M, et al. SYT-SSX breakpoint peptide vaccines in patients with synovial sarcoma: a study from the Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group. Cancer Sci. 2012;103(9):1625–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Takahashi R, Ishibashi Y, Hiraoka K, Matsueda S, Kawano K, Kawahara A, et al. Phase II study of personalized peptide vaccination for refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma patients. Cancer Sci. 2013;104(10):1285–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Dillman RO, Wiemann M, Nayak SK, DeLeon C, Hood K, DePriest C. Interferon-gamma or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor administered as adjuvants with a vaccine of irradiated autologous tumor cells from short-term cell line cultures: a randomized phase 2 trial of the cancer biotherapy research group. J Immunother. 2003;26(4):367–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kershaw MH, Westwood JA, Darcy PK. Gene-engineered T cells for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(8):525–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Wei R, Dean DC, Thanindratarn P, Hornicek FJ, Guo W, Duan Z. Cancer testis antigens in sarcoma: expression, function and immunotherapeutic application. Cancer Lett. 2020;479:54–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Tine BAV, Butler MO, Araujo D, Johnson ML, Clarke J, Liebner D, et al. ADP-A2M4 (MAGE-A4) in patients with Synovial Sarcoma. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:v683–709.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hong DS, Tine BAV, Olszanski AJ, Johnson ML, Liebner DA, Trivedi T, et al. Phase I dose escalation and expansion trial to assess the safety and efficacy of ADP-A2M4 SPEAR T cells in advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15):102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. • D’Angelo SP, Tine BAV, Attia S, Blay J-Y, Strauss SJ, Morales CMV, et al. SPEARHEAD-1: a phase 2 trial of afamitresgene autoleucel (Formerly ADP-A2M4) in patients with advanced synovial sarcoma or myxoid/round cell liposarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15):1150. A recent phase II study of adoptive cell therapy in sarcoma with promising preliminary results. This study is still ongoing and is a basis for future studies.

  69. Robbins PF, Kassim SH, Tran TL, Crystal JS, Morgan RA, Feldman SA, et al. A pilot trial using lymphocytes genetically engineered with an NY-ESO-1-reactive T-cell receptor: long-term follow-up and correlates with response. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(5):1019–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. D’Angelo SP, Melchiori L, Merchant MS, Bernstein D, Glod J, Kaplan R, et al. Antitumor activity associated with prolonged persistence of adoptively transferred NY-ESO-1 (c259)T cells in synovial sarcoma. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(8):944–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Ahmed N, Brawley VS, Hegde M, Robertson C, Ghazi A, Gerken C, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -specific chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for the immunotherapy of HER2-positive sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(15):1688–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Huang X, Park H, Greene J, Pao J, Mulvey E, Zhou SX, et al. IGF1R- and ROR1-specific CAR T cells as a potential therapy for high risk sarcomas. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133152.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Huang G, Yu L, Cooper LJ, Hollomon M, Huls H, Kleinerman ES. Genetically modified T cells targeting interleukin-11 receptor alpha-chain kill human osteosarcoma cells and induce the regression of established osteosarcoma lung metastases. Cancer Res. 2012;72(1):271–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Keung EZ, Burgess M, Salazar R, Parra ER, Rodrigues-Canales J, Bolejack V, et al. Correlative analyses of the SARC028 trial reveal an association between sarcoma-associated immune infiltrate and response to pembrolizumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(6):125–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Room 620 Queen Sirikit Medical Center, 270 Rama VI Road, Rajthevi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

    Thanate Dajsakdipon MD, Teerada Siripoon MD, Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon MD, Touch Ativitavas MD & Thitiya Dejthevaporn MD

Authors
  1. Thanate Dajsakdipon MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teerada Siripoon MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Touch Ativitavas MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thitiya Dejthevaporn MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thitiya Dejthevaporn MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Sarcoma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dajsakdipon, T., Siripoon, T., Ngamphaiboon, N. et al. Immunotherapy and Biomarkers in Sarcoma. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 23, 415–438 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-022-00944-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-022-00944-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation