Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Approach to Resectable Gastric Cancer: Evolving Paradigm of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatment

  • Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers (JD Berlin, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Recent therapeutic advances have prolonged survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer, though the prognosis for patients with locally advanced resectable gastric cancer remains poor. Long-term survival after resection of locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma is dependent on early eradication of micrometastatic disease and optimal surgical resection. Preoperative therapy with a docetaxel-containing three-drug regimen has recently been shown to be superior to an anthracycline-containing three-drug regimen or two-drug therapy with a fluoropyrimidine and platinum. Chemoradiation is not essential and is reserved for patients with suboptimal resection. Emerging research strategies include introduction of pre- and postoperative checkpoint blockade and biomarker-directed therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferlay J, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144:1941–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hampel H, et al. Meta-analysis: obesity and the risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:199–211.

  4. Rubenstein JH, Taylor JB. Meta-analysis: the association of oesophageal adenocarcinoma with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:1222–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thun M, et al. Part IV cancers by tissue of origin. Cancer Epidemiol Preven. 2018;635–660.

  6. Buas MF, Vaughan TL. Epidemiology and risk factors for gastroesophageal junction tumors: understanding the rising incidence of this disease. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2013;23:3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Howlader N, et al. Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2017 - SEER Statistics. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2017, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2019. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2017/

  8. McMillian, N. et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Gastric Cancer (Version 2.2022). 2021. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/gastric.pdf

  9. Cunningham D, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ychou M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1715–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schuhmacher C, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European organisation for research and treatment of cancer randomized trial 40954. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:5210–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ji J, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy of oxaliplatin combined with S-1 (SOX) versus postoperative chemotherapy of SOX or oxaliplatin with capecitabine (XELOX) in locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma with D2 gastrectomy: a randomized phase III trial. Oncol: RESOLVE trial. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:v877.

  13. Ji J, et al. A randomized, multicenter, controlled study to compare perioperative chemotherapy of oxaliplatin combined with TS-1 (SOX) versus SOX or oxaliplatin with capecitabine (XELOX) as post-operative chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma with D2 dissection (RESOLVE trial). J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:TPS4136.

  14. •• Al-Batran SE, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1948–57. The FLOT4 study is practice-changing, as it has led to the paradigm shift to a docetaxel-containing 3-drug regimen in the perioperative setting for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, in place of a 2-drug regimen or an anthracycline-containing 3-drug regimen.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Batran SE, et al. Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1697–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Batran SE, et al. The feasibility of triple-drug chemotherapy combination in older adult patients with oesophagogastric cancer: a randomised trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (FLOT65+). Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:835–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lorenzen S, et al. Feasibility of perioperative chemotherapy with infusional 5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with (FLOT) or without (FLO) docetaxel in elderly patients with locally advanced esophagogastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:519–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilke H, et al. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014.

  19. Cunningham D, et al. Peri-operative chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in operable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (UK medical research council ST03): primary analysis results of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2–3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017.

  20. Al-Batran S-E, et al. Perioperative ramucirumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone for resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (RAMSES/FLOT7): results of the phase II-portion—A multicenter, randomized phase II/III trial of the German AIO and Italian GOIM. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:4501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koenig JL, et al. Microsatellite instability and adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2019;42:573–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cercek A, et al. Mismatch repair-deficient rectal cancer and resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:3271.

  23. Bang YJ, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:315–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee J, et al. Phase III trial comparing capecitabine plus cisplatin versus capecitabine plus cisplatin with concurrent capecitabine radiotherapy in completely resected gastric cancer with D2 lymph node dissection: the ARTIST trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:268–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bajetta E, et al. Randomized trial on adjuvant treatment with FOLFIRI followed by docetaxel and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for radically resected gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:1373–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pietrantonio F, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of the value of microsatellite instability as a biomarker in gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:3392–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vos EL, et al. The interaction between microsatellite instability high (MSI-high) gastric cancer and chemotherapy on survival. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:244–4.

  28. Macdonald JS, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:725–30.

  29. Smalley SR, et al. Updated analysis of SWOG-directed intergroup study 0116: a phase III trial of adjuvant radiochemotherapy versus observation after curative gastric cancer resection. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2327–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fuchs CS, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotlherapy with epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil compared with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with fluorouracil and leucovorin after curative resection of gastric cancer: Results from CALGB 80101 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3671–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Park SH, et al. Phase III trial to compare adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer: final report of the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in stomach tumors trial, including survival and subset analyses. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3130–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. •• Park SH, et al. A randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant single-agent S1, S-1 with oxaliplatin, and postoperative chemoradiation with S-1 and oxaliplatin in patients with node-positive gastric cancer after D2 resection: the ARTIST 2 trial. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:368–74. The ARTIST 2 trial demonstrated no benefit for adjuvant chemoradiation in patients with lymph-node positive gastric adenocarcinoma and is the first to show a benefit for adding oxaliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine in the adjuvant setting.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cats A, et al. Chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy after surgery and preoperative chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer (CRITICS): an international, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:616–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sakuramoto S, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an Oral Fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1810–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sasako M, et al. Five-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus surgery alone in stage II or III gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4387–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Noh SH, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): 5-year follow-up of an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1389–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yoshida K, et al. Addition of docetaxel to oral fluoropyrimidine improves efficacy in patients with stage III gastric cancer: interim analysis of JACCRO GC-07, a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1296–304.

  38. Tsuburaya A, et al. Sequential paclitaxel followed by tegafur and uracil (UFT) or S-1 versus UFT or S-1 monotherapy as adjuvant chemotherapy for T4a/b gastric cancer (SAMIT): a phase 3 factorial randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:886–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bang YJ, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:687–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hofheinz RD, et al. Perioperative trastuzumab and pertuzumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone for HER2-positive resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: final results of the PETRARCA multicenter randomized phase II trial of the AIO. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:4502–2.

  41. Tabernero J, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy for HER2-positive metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (JACOB): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1372–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Shitara K, et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2419–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bang YJ, et al. KEYNOTE-585: phase III study of perioperative chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab for gastric cancer. Future Oncol. 2019;15:943–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hsieh C-C, et al. Circulating cell-free DNA levels could predict oncological outcomes of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:2131.

  45. O’Leary B, et al. Early circulating tumor DNA dynamics and clonal selection with palbociclib and fulvestrant for breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2018;9:896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Garcia-Murillas I, Turner NC. Assessing HER2 amplification in plasma cfDNA. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1768:161–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Diehl F, et al. Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nat Med. 2008;14:985–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nakano Y, et al. KRAS mutations in cell-free DNA from preoperative and postoperative sera as a pancreatic cancer marker: a retrospective study. Br J Cancer. 2018;118:662–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sausen M, et al. Clinical implications of genomic alterations in the tumour and circulation of pancreatic cancer patients. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Yang J, et al. Deep sequencing of circulating tumor DNA detects molecular residual disease and predicts recurrence in gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:346.

  51. Ott K, et al. Metabolic imaging predicts response, survival, and recurrence in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4692–8.

  52. Shah MA, et al. A phase II study of preoperative chemotherapy with irinotecan(CPT) and cisplatin(CIS) for gastric cancer(NCI 5917): FDG-PET/CT predicts patient outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Won E, et al. Use of positron emission tomography scan response to guide treatment change for locally advanced gastric cancer: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center experience. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016;7:506.

  54. Shah MA, et al. Impact of early FDG-PET directed intervention on preoperative therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a cooperative group random assignment phase II study (Alliance A021302) Impac. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:TPS4135–TPS4135.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Smalley SR, et al. Updated analysis of SWOG-directed intergroup study 0116: a phase III trial of adjuvant radiochemotherapy versus observation after curative gastric cancer resection. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2327–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Y. Ku.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lumish, M.A., Ku, G.Y. Approach to Resectable Gastric Cancer: Evolving Paradigm of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatment. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 23, 1044–1058 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-021-00917-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-021-00917-1

Keywords

Navigation