Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma

  • Genitourinary Cancers (W Oh and M Galsky, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

The advent of checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized systemic therapy for many malignancies, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC) where multiple PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 inhibitors have demonstrated responses and improved survival for patients in clinical trials. Durable benefit with manageable toxicity can be achieved with these agents—but unfortunately for only a minority of individuals. Efforts are ongoing to understand mechanisms driving the response and resistance to checkpoint inhibitors in order to personalize therapy and extend benefit to more patients. In particular, combination immunotherapy is an area of active study with multiple ongoing trials in RCC. Novel immunotherapeutic agents are being explored as well. Clinically, there are nuances related to the use of immunotherapy that are important to understand in order to provide optimal care to patients. Potential autoimmune toxicities are important to identify early so they can be best mitigated with immunosuppression, and careful review of imaging with clinical correlation is important to ensure responding patients are not taken off treatment prematurely due to “pseudo-progression.” Lastly, although immunotherapy is an important new tool, it exists among other active agents in the treatment of RCC, and further study is needed to understand where it best fits in the treatment paradigm. In this article, we review the most recent data for immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and more broadly discuss the rapidly evolving landscape of immunotherapy in RCC, including combination immunotherapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Kidney and Renal Pelvis Cancer. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/kidrp.html.

  3. Fisher RI, Rosenberg SA, Fyfe G. Long-term survival update for high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cancer J Sci Am. 2000;6(Suppl 1):S55–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fyfe G, et al. Results of treatment of 255 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13(3):688–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rini BI, et al. Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa compared with interferon alfa monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: CALGB 90206. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(33):5422–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Escudier B, et al. Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9605):2103–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Motzer RJ, et al. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(8):722–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Motzer RJ, et al. Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(2):115–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sternberg CN, et al. Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(6):1061–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. • Motzer RJ, et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(19):1803–13. This phase III randomized trial showed superiority of nivolumab compared to everolimus. Based on these results, nivolumab is now a standard second-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammers H. Updated results from a phase I study of nivolumab (Nivo) in combination with ipilimumab (Ipi) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): the CheckMate 016 study. ESMO 2016 meeting. 1062P.

  12. McDermott D. A phase 1/2 study to assess the safety and efficacy of pazopanib and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. European Cancer Congress 2015; Vienna, Austria.

  13. Yang JC, et al. Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4 antibody) causes regression of metastatic renal cell cancer associated with enteritis and hypophysitis. J Immunother. 2007;30(8):825–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. • Choueiri TK, et al. Immunomodulatory activity of nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2016: p 5461–71. Pre-treatment and on- treatment tissue samples were prospectively collected to investigate mechanism of action of nivoulmab in RCC as part of this phase II trial. Analysis of these samples revealed evidence of immunomodulatory activity with increases in tumor associated lymphocytes and transcriptional changes in IFN gamma-stimulated genes after treatment with nivolumab.

  15. Motzer RJ, et al. Nivolumab for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(13):1430–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dong H, et al. Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: a potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nat Med. 2002;8(8):793–800.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fife BT, et al. Interactions between PD-1 and PD-L1 promote tolerance by blocking the TCR-induced stop signal. Nat Immunol. 2009;10(11):1185–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rudd CE. The reverse stop-signal model for CTLA4 function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(2):153–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ko JS, et al. Sunitinib mediates reversal of myeloid-derived suppressor cell accumulation in renal cell carcinoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(6):2148–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kusmartsev S, Gabrilovich DI. Role of immature myeloid cells in mechanisms of immune evasion in cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006;55(3):237–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Du Four S, et al. Axitinib increases the infiltration of immune cells and reduces the suppressive capacity of monocytic MDSCs in an intracranial mouse melanoma model. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4(4):e998107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Terme M, et al. Modulation of immunity by antiangiogenic molecules in cancer. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:492920.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Amin A, et al. Nivolumab (anti-PD-1; BMS-936558, ONO-4538) in combination with sunitinib or pazopanib in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts). 2014;32(15_suppl):5010.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Choueiri TK, et al. Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma (METEOR): final results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(7):917–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Apolo A, Mortazavi A, Stein M. A phase I study of cabozantinib plus nivolumab (CaboNivo) in patients (pts) refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and other genitourinary (GU) tumors. 2016. Ann Oncol 27 (suppl 6).

  26. Flanigan RC, et al. Nephrectomy followed by interferon alfa-2b compared with interferon alfa-2b alone for metastatic renal-cell cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(23):1655–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mickisch G, et al. Radical nephrectomy plus interferon-alfa-based immunotherapy compared with interferon alfa alone in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2001;358(9286):966–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Patnaik A, et al. Phase I study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475; anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(19):4286–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Atkins M. Axitinib in combination with pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): preliminary safety and efficacy results. ESMO 2016 meeting. 773PD.

  30. Infante, J.R., et al. A phase I, multicenter, open-label, first-in-human study to evaluate MEDI0680, an anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody, in patients with advanced malignancies. in ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. 2015.

  31. McDermott DF, et al. Atezolizumab, an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody, in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: long-term safety, clinical activity, and immune correlates from a phase Ia study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(8):833–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wallin JJ, et al. Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab enhances antigen-specific T-cell migration in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12624.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Sznol M. Phase Ib evaluation of MPDL3280A (anti-PDL1) in combination with bevacizumab (bev) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl 7; abstr 410).

  34. Krummel MF, Allison JP. Pillars article: CD28 and CTLA-4 have opposing effects on the response of T cells to stimulation. J Exp Med. 1995;182:459–65. J Immunol, 2011. 187(7): p. 3459-65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schwartz RH. Costimulation of T lymphocytes: the role of CD28, CTLA-4, and B7/BB1 in interleukin-2 production and immunotherapy. Cell. 1992;71(7):1065–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. O’Day SJ, Hamid O, Urba WJ. Targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4). Cancer. 2007;110(12):2614–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Larkin J, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD. Combined nivolumab and Ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(13):1270–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rini BI, et al. Phase 1 dose-escalation trial of tremelimumab plus sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2011;117(4):758–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Robert C, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2521–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Grosso JF, et al. LAG-3 regulates CD8+ T cell accumulation and effector function in murine self- and tumor-tolerance systems. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(11):3383–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Brignone C, et al. A phase I pharmacokinetic and biological correlative study of IMP321, a novel MHC class II agonist, in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(19):6225–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Linch SN, McNamara MJ, Redmond WL. OX40 agonists and combination immunotherapy: putting the pedal to the metal. Front Oncol. 2015;5:34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Tolcher A. Phase Ib study of PF-05082566 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3002).

  44. Infante J. A phase Ib dose escalation study of the OX40 agonist MOXR0916 and the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 101).

  45. Liu X, et al. Selective inhibition of IDO1 effectively regulates mediators of antitumor immunity. Blood. 2010;115(17):3520–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gangadhar T. Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma and select solid tumors: updated phase 1 results from ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037. 2016: Ann Oncol 27 (6): abstract 1110PD.

  47. Thompson RH, et al. Tumor B7-H1 is associated with poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma patients with long-term follow-up. Cancer Res. 2006;66(7):3381–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mahoney K, Kotecha R, CM. Association of higher PD-L1 expression in tumor cells of metastatic ccRCC lesions with worse overall survival. J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr e23221).

  49. Patel SP, Kurzrock R. PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015;14(4):847–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM. Targeting the PD-1/B7-H1(PD-L1) pathway to activate anti-tumor immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012;24(2):207–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Chiou VL, Burotto M. Pseudoprogression and immune-related response in solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(31):3541–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Wolchok JD, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(23):7412–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Atkinson V. Complete responders to anti-PD1 antibodies. What happens when we stop? ESMO 2016 meeting. 1116P.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth R. Plimack MD, MS.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Pooja Ghatalia declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Matthew Zibelman has received institution-directed funds for clinical research from Horizon Pharma and served on an advisory board for EMD Serono and has a patent pending on interferon-gamma and nivolumab in multiple cancers (including RCC).

Daniel M. Geynisman has received financial support through grants from Millennium, Merck, Genentech, and Pfizer and has received compensation from Exelixis and Pfizer for service as a consultant.

Elizabeth R. Plimack has received support through grants to her institution for clinical trial costs from Acceleron, AstraZeneca, Aveo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dendreon, Eli Lilly, Inc., Merck, Novartis, Peloton, and Pfizer; has received compensation from Acceleron, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dendreon, Exelixis, Genentech/Roche, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer for scientific advisory and/or training; has received compensation from Eli Lilly, Inc., Pfizer, and Synergene for data safety monitoring; and has a patent (US Patent Application no. 14/588,503, filed January 2, 2015) pending.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Genitourinary Cancers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghatalia, P., Zibelman, M., Geynisman, D.M. et al. Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 18, 7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-017-0458-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-017-0458-0

Keywords

Navigation