Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Short-Course versus Long-Course Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer—Time to Change Strategies?

  • Lower Gastrointestinal Cancers (AB Benson, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

There is significant debate regarding the optimal neoadjuvant regimen for resectable rectal cancer patients. Short-course radiotherapy, a standard approach throughout most of northern Europe, is generally defined as 25 Gy in 5 fractions over the course of 1 week without the concurrent administration of chemotherapy. Long-course radiotherapy is typically defined as 45 to 50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions with the administration of concurrent 5-fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy and is the standard approach in other parts of Europe and the United States. At present, two randomized trials have compared outcomes for short course radiotherapy with long-course chemoradiation showing no difference in respective study endpoints. Late toxicity data are lacking given limited follow-up. Although the ideal neoadjuvant regimen is controversial, our current bias is long-course chemoradiation to treat patients with locally advanced, resectable rectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336(14):980–7.

  2. Folkesson J et al. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial: long lasting benefits from radiotherapy on survival and local recurrence rate. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(24):5644–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kapiteijn E et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(9):638–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van Gijn W et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(6):575–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Quirke P et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9666):821–8. This study incorporated rigorous pathologic evaluation of surgical specimens as part of the MRC CR07 randomized trial. Interestingly , although TME was standard, only 50 % of patients had true TME, after pathologic evaluation. In patients undergoing TME and preoperative RT, local failure was 1 %.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sebag-Montefiore D et al. Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9666):811–20.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas PR, Lindblad AS. Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy in rectal carcinoma: a review of the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group experience. Radiother Oncol. 1988;13(4):245–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krook JE et al. Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(11):709–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roh MS et al. Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(31):5124–30.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Park JH et al. Randomized phase 3 trial comparing preoperative and postoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine for locally advanced rectal cancer. Cancer. 2011;117(16):3703–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sauer R et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1731–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sauer R et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(16):1926–33. Updated results from the German Rectal Cancer study indicating persistent local control benefit assocated with preoperative chemoradiation.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bujko K et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative short-course radiotherapy with preoperative conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93(10):1215–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ngan SY et al. Randomized trial of short-course radiotherapy versus long-course chemoradiation comparing rates of local recurrence in patients with t3 rectal cancer: trans-tasman radiation oncology group trial 01.04. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(31):3827–33. One of two randomized trials addressing the question of optimal neoadjuvant regimen: long course chemoradiation or short course RT befroe surgery. Primary study endpoint was 3-year local control.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grumann MM et al. Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2001;233(2):149–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pettersson D et al. Interim analysis of the Stockholm III trial of preoperative radiotherapy regimens for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97(4):580–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Siegel R et al. Preoperative short-course radiotherapy versus combined radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multi-centre prospectively randomised study of the Berlin Cancer Society. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:50.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Manisha Palta, Christopher G. Willett, and Brian G. Czito declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manisha Palta M.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palta, M., Willett, C.G. & Czito, B.G. Short-Course versus Long-Course Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer—Time to Change Strategies?. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 15, 421–428 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-014-0296-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-014-0296-2

Keywords

Navigation