Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of culture and patriotism on home bias in bond portfolios

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Managerial Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extant research has documented a substantial impact of culture and patriotism on equity home bias. This paper examines whether culture and patriotism influence home bias in bond portfolios. In this respect, I differentiate between two different aspects of home bias: domestic bias (overinvestment in domestic debt securities) and foreign bias (over- or underinvestment in debt securities issued by different host countries). The analysis uses the Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey data over the 2004–2012 period and relies on extensive robustness checks based on four internationally recognized cross-cultural research projects: the GLOBE study of House et al. (Culture, leadership, and organizations: the GLOBE study of 62 societies, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 2004), the “Cultures and Organizations” of Hofstede et al. (Cultures and organizations: software of the mind, 3rd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2010), the International Social Survey Program, and the World Values Survey. There is strong evidence that patriotism deters foreign investment and increases overinvestment in domestic bonds. Investors from countries with higher levels of uncertainty avoidance invest less in foreign debt markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For instance, governments frequently appeal to the patriotic feeling of the citizens to promote the sovereign debt issuances. The “Patriot Bonds” of the US government is one example of a successful patriotic promotion of sovereign bonds (Morse and Shive 2011).

  2. If uncertainty avoidance reflected only risk aversion, its impact on home bias would be ambiguous. It would, indeed, be positive for investors from home countries with less risky bonds. By contrast, an investor located in a country with comparatively risky bonds would be unwilling to invest much of his wealth in domestic bonds and, instead, reduce risk by international diversification. In this case, the impact of uncertainty avoidance on home bias would be negative.

  3. These dimensions are power distance, masculinity, individualism, and uncertainty avoidance. Indulgence and long-term orientation are not included since these scores are not available for several countries in my sample.

  4. Results on the Hausman and Sargan-Hansen tests are available on demand.

  5. A comparable cross-sectional estimation for domestic bias is not possible due to a low number of sample countries: It would result in a regression model with 15 regressors and only 39 observations.

  6. The correlation between the uncertainty avoidance scores of Hofstede et al. (2010) and the GLOBE study amounts to 0.34 for the sample countries.

  7. The impact of the individualism scores of Hofstede et al. (2010) is substantially lower for domestic bond bias compared to the results of Anderson et al. (2011) for domestic equity bias.

  8. Columns (4) and (6) of Table 7 show that the coefficient estimate on the WVS patriotism looses more than half of its value when the GLOBE cultural variables instead of the cultural variables of Hofstede et al. (2010) are used. One potential explanation may be collinearity: Table 3 shows that cultural distance, uncertainty avoidance, and the institutional collectivism of the GLOBE study are more strongly correlated with the WVS patriotism than the corresponding cultural variables of Hofstede et al. (2010).

  9. Given that the sample mean of the actual portfolio weight amounts to 0.66 %, the economic impact of uncertainty avoidance on the actual portfolio weight is still considerable.

References

  • Aggarwal R, Goodell JW (2009) Markets and institutions in financial intermediation: national characteristics as determinants. J Bank Financ 33:1770–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal R, Kearney C, Lucey B (2012) Gravity and culture in foreign portfolio investment. J Bank Financ 36:525–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson CW, Fedenia M, Hirschey M, Skiba H (2011) Cultural influences on home bias and international diversification by institutional investors. J Bank Financ 35:916–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benartzi S (2001) Excessive extrapolation and the allocation of 401(k) accounts to company stock. J Financ 56:1747–1764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benos E, Jochec M (2013) Patriotic name bias and stock returns. J Financ Mark 16:550–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk S, Frijns B (2010) A cultural explanation of the foreign bias in international asset allocation. J Bank Financ 34:2121–2131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle P, Garlappi L, Uppal R, Wang T (2012) Keynes meets Markowitz: the trade-off between familiarity and diversification. Manag Sci 58:253–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan K, Covrig V, Ng L (2005) What determines the domestic bias and foreign bias? Evidence from mutual fund equity allocations worldwide. J Financ 60:1495–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chui A, Kwok C (2008) National culture and life insurance consumption. J Int Bus Stud 39:88–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chui A, Titman S, Wei J (2010) Individualism and momentum around the world. J Financ 45:361–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen L (2009) Loyalty-based portfolio choice. Rev Financ Stud 22:1213–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Moor L, Vanpée R (2013) What drives international equity and bond holdings? An empirical study. Appl Financ Econ 23:1067–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira MA, Miguel AF (2011) The determinants of domestic and foreign bond bias. J Multinatl Financ Manag 21:279–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidora M, Fratzscher M, Thimann C (2007) Home bias in global bond and equity markets: the role of real exchange rate volatility. J Int Money Financ 26:631–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham A, Ribchester T (1995) Tolerance of ambiguity: a review of the concept, its measurement and applications. Curr Psychol 14:179–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannetti M, Yafeh Y (2012) Do cultural differences between contracting parties matter? Evidence from syndicated bank loans. Manag Sci 58:365–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetman WN, Kumar A (2008) Equity portfolio diversification. Rev Financ 12:433–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2001) How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. J Financ 56:1053–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2009) Cultural biases in economic exchange? Q J Econ 124:1095–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney J, Lawson R, Hall J (2013) 2013 economic freedom dataset. Economic Freedom of the World: 2013 Annual Report, Fraser Institute

  • Heath C, Tversky A (1991) Preference and belief: ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. J Risk Uncertainty 4:5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RC, Adkins LC (2001) Collinearity. In: Baltagi BH (ed). A companion to theoretical econometrics (Chapter 12). Blackwell, Oxford

  • Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (2006) What did GLOBE really measure? Researchers’ minds versus respondents’ minds. J Int Bus Stud 37:882–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (2010) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • House RJ, Hanges Paul J, Javidan M, Dorfman PW, Gupta V (2004) Culture, leadership, and organizations: the GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman G (2001) Familiarity breeds investment. Rev Financ Stud 14:659–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok C, Tadesse S (2006) National culture and financial systems. J Int Bus Stud 37:227–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1997) Legal determinants of external finance. J Financ 52:1131–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2008) The economic consequences of legal origins. J Econ Lit 46:285–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintner J (1965) The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Rev Econ Stat 47:13–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus HP, Kitayama S (1991) Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev 98:224–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morosini P, Shane S, Singh H (1998) National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance. J Int Bus Stud 29:137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse A, Shive S (2011) Patriotism in your portfolio. J Financ Mark 14:411–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odean T (1998) Volume, volatility, price, and profit when all traders are above average. J Financ 53:1887–1934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes R, Rey H, Oh Y (2001) Information and capital flows: the determinants of transactions in financial assets. Eur Econ Rev 45:783–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe WF (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Financ 19:425–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimp TA, Sharma S (1987) Consumer ethnocentrism: construction and validation of the CETSCALE. J Mark Res 24:280–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solnik B, Zuo L (2013) Relative optimism and home bias. Working Paper

  • Stulz RM, Williamson R (2003) Culture, openness, and finance. J Financ Econ 70:313–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Steen E (2004) Rational overoptimism (and other biases). Am Econ Rev 94:1141–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank the anonymous referees for the helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Finance, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Elina Pradkhan

Authors
  1. Elina Pradkhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elina Pradkhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pradkhan, E. Impact of culture and patriotism on home bias in bond portfolios. Rev Manag Sci 10, 265–301 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0146-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0146-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation