Abstract
The identification and analysis of moderator relationships regularly confronts the empirical research with statistical and methodical challenges. Which misinterpretations and false conclusions result from different methodical procedures for the identification of moderator effects shall be demonstrated by means of the present contribution. Thereby, the moderated regression analysis represents the most popular procedure in this context.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Implying an interaction effect of the independent variables x and z on the dependent variable y, on the one hand, one can assume that the effect of x on y is moderated by z; on the other hand, the correlation can also be interpreted in a way that the effect of z on y is moderated by x. Insofar the variables x and z act symmetrically. Which variable is defined as moderator variable is an issue for theoretical consideration.
On the supposition that x and y act symmetrically for reasons of completeness, also Model III is displayed; see also the annotations in footnote 2. Model III implies that z serves as predictor and x as moderator variable.
References
Aguinis H (1995) Statistical power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research. J Manag 21:1141–1158
Aguinis H (2004) Regression analysis for categorical moderators. Guilford Press, New York
Aguinis H, Beaty JC, Boik RJ, Pierce CA (2005) Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: a 30- year review. J Appl Psychol 90(1):94–107
Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
Anderson LE, Stone-Romero EF, Tisak JA (1996) A comparison of bias and mean squared error in parameter estimates of interaction effects: moderated multiple regression versus errors-in-variables regression. Multivar Behav Res 31:69–94
Arnold HJ (1982) Moderator variables: a clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues. Organ Behav Hum Perform 29:143–174
Arnold HJ (1984) Testing moderator variable hypotheses: a reply to Stone and Hollenbeck. Organ Behav Hum Perform 34:214–224
Baltes-Götz B (2006) Moderatoranalyse per multipler Regression mit SPSS, Online-Dokument: http://www.uni-trier.de/urt/urthome.shtml, abgerufen am 15 July 2006
Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182
Bissonnette V, Ickes W, Bernstein I, Knowles E (1990) Personality moderating variables: a warning about statistical artifact and a comparison of analytic techniques. J Pers 58:567–587
Carte TA, Russell CJ (2003) In pursuit of moderation: nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Q 27(3):479–501
Chaplin WF (1991) The next generation in moderation research in personality psychology. J Pers 59:143–178
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
Cortina JM (1993a) Interaction, nonlinearity, and multicollinearity: implications for multiple regression. J Manag 19:915–922
Cortina JM (1993b) What is coefficient alpha? an examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol 78:98–104
Cronbach LJ (1987) Statistical tests for moderator variables: flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychol Bull 102:414–417
Darrow AL, Kahl DR (1982) A comparison of moderated regression techniques considering strength of effect. J Manag 8(2):35–47
Einhorn HJ, Bass AR (1971) Methodological considerations relevant to discrimination in employment testing. Psychol Bull 75:261–269
Frazier PA, Tix AP, Barron KE (2004) Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol 51(1):115–134
Hays WL (1983) Statistics. Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York
Holmbeck GN (1997) Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. J Consult Clin Psychol 65:599–610
Huber F, Heitmann M, Herrmann A (2006) Ansätze zur Kausalmodellierung mit Interaktionseffekten. Die Betriebswirtschaft 66(6):696–710
Hunter JE, Schmidt FL (1978) Differential and single-group validity of employment tests by race: a critical analysis of three recent studies. J Appl Psychol 63:1–11
Irwin JR, McClelland GH (2001) Misleading heuristics and moderated multiple regression models. J Mark Res 38:100–109
Jaccard J, Turrisi R (2003) Interaction effects in multiple regression, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
Jaccard J, Wan CK (1995) Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychol Bull 117:348–357
Jaccard J, Wan CK (1996) LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi
Jaccard J, Turrisi R, Wan CK (1990) Interaction effects in multiple regression, Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences 07–072. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
James LR, Brett JM (1984) Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. J Appl Psychol 69:307–321
Judd CM, McClelland GH, Culhane SE (1995) Data analysis: continuing issues in the everyday analysis of psychological data. Annu Rev Psychol 46:433–465
Judd CM, Kenny DA, McClelland GH (2001) Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subjects designs. Psychol Methods 6:115–134
Kahl DR, Darrow AL (1984) Model determination in moderated regression. J Manag 10:234–236
Landis RS, Dunlap WP (2000) Moderated multiple regression–tests are criterion specific. Organ Res Methods 3:254–266
Lubinski D, Humphreys LG (1990) Assessing spurious “moderator effects”: illustrated substantively with the hypothesized (“synergistic”) relation between spatial and mathematical ability. Psychol Bull 107:385–393
MacCallum RC, Mar CM (1995) Distinguishing between moderator and quadratic effects in multiple regression. Psychol Bull 118:405–421
MacCallum RC, Zhang S, Preacher KJ, Rucker DD (2002) On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychol Methods 7:19–40
Mason CA, Tu S, Cauce AM (1996) Assessing moderator variables: two computer simulation studies. Educ Psychol Measur 56:45–62
McClelland GH, Judd CM (1993) Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychol Bull 114:376–390
Morris JH, Mansfield ER, Sherman JD (1986) Failures to detect moderating effects with ordinary least squares-moderated multiple regression: some reasons and a remedy. Psychol Bull 99:282–288
Muller D, Judd CM, Yzerbyt VY (2005) When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. J Pers Soc Psychol 89(6):852–863
Nunnally JC (1967) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York
Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Peterson RA (1994) A meta-analysis of cronbach’s coefficient alpha. J Consum Res 21:381–391
Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Klein A (1998) Structural equation models with latent interaction effects: comparing the efficiency of LMS, LISREL-ML and LISREL-WLSA. In: Hox JJ, de Leeuw ED (eds) Assumptions, robustness, and estimation methods in multivariate modeling. TT-Publikaties, Amsterdam, pp 87–109
Schmitt NW, Klimoski RJ (1991) Research methods in human resource management. South-Western, Cincinnati, OH
Sharma S, Durand RM, Gur-Arie O (1981) Identification and analysis of moderator variables. J Mark Res 18:291–300
Shrout PE, Bolger N (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods 7:422–445
Smith KW, Sasaki MS (1979) Decreasing multicollinearity: a method for models with multiplicative functions. Sociol Methods Res 8:35–56
Stone EF (1988) Moderator variables in research: a review and analysis of conceptual and methodological issues. In: Ferris GR, Rowland KM (eds) Research in personnel and human resources management, vol 6. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 191–229
Stone EF, Hollenbeck JR (1984) Some issues associated with the use of moderated regression. Organ Behav Hum Perform 34:195–213
Stone EF, Hollenbeck JR (1989) Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: empirical evidence and related matters. J Appl Psychol 74:3–10
Stone-Romero EF, Anderson LE (1994) Relative power of moderated multiple regression and the comparison of subgroup correlation coefficients for detecting moderating effects. J Appl Psychol 79(3):354–359
Zedeck S (1971) Problems with the use of “moderator” variables. Psychol Bull 76:295–310
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and Wolfgang Kuersten for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Helm, R., Mark, A. Analysis and evaluation of moderator effects in regression models: state of art, alternatives and empirical example. Rev Manag Sci 6, 307–332 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-010-0057-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-010-0057-y