Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of video exercise-based telerehabilitation on clinical outcomes, expectation, satisfaction, and motivation in patients with chronic low back pain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 02 October 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

The efficacy of exercise-based telerehabilitation in chronic low back pain (CLBP) has not been well studied. To our knowledge, no other studies have investigated the efficacy of video exercise–based telerehabilitation software in the remote management of home exercises in patients with CLBP.

Aims

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of the video-based exercise software on pain, function, quality-of-life, expectation, satisfaction, and motivation in individuals with CLBP.

Methods

A double-blind, two-armed randomized controlled trial was carried out with 50 individuals with CLBP. Participants were randomly allocated to either the telerehabilitation group (n = 25) or the conventional rehabilitation group (n = 25). The telerehabilitation group was followed up with a video exercise–based telerehabilitation software called Fizyoweb. The clinician was able to communicate with the patients through the software. The conventional rehabilitation group was given the same home exercises as the paper-based exercise instruction form. Pain, function, quality-of-life, and kinesiophobia were evaluated at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention. In addition, patient expectations were questioned at the initial evaluation; afterward, patient satisfaction and motivation were questioned at the eighth week.

Results

After 8 weeks of treatment, the telerehabilitation group achieved significant improvement in pain, function, quality-of-life, kinesiophobia, satisfaction, and motivation (p < 0.05). In addition, the telerehabilitation group reported more significant gains in all parameters compared with the conventional rehabilitation group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The video exercise–based telerehabilitation software positively affects clinical parameters and adherence to rehabilitation in patients with CLBP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Change history

References

  1. Murphy S, Blake C, Power CK, Fullen BM (2013) The role of clinical specialist physiotherapists in the management of low back pain in a spinal triage clinic. Ir J Med Sci 182(4):643–650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mirmoezzi M, Irandoust K, H’mida C et al (2021) Efficacy of hydrotherapy treatment for the management of chronic low back pain. Ir J Med Sci (1971-):1–9

  3. Monticone M, Ambrosini E, Rocca B et al (2014) A multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme improves disability, kinesiophobia and walking ability in subjects with chronic low back pain: results of a randomised controlled pilot study. Eur Spine J 23(10):2105–2113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fourney DR, Andersson G, Arnold PM et al (2011) Chronic low back pain: a heterogeneous condition with challenges for an evidence-based approach. Spine 36:S1–S9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, Buchbinder R (2010) The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 24(6):769–781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Linton, S. (1998) The socioeconomic impact of chronic back pain: Is anyone benefiting. Pain 75(1):163–168

  7. Karppinen J, Shen FH, Luk KDK et al (2011) Management of degenerative disk disease and chronic low back pain. Orthopedic Clinics 42(4):513–528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Verhagen AP et al (2010) Exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific low-back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 24(2):193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson RW, Williams SA, Gucciardi DF et al (2018) Evaluating the effectiveness of home exercise programmes using an online exercise prescription tool in children with cerebral palsy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ open 8(1):e018316

  10. Russell TG (2009) Telerehabilitation: a coming of age. Aust J Physiot 55(1):5–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tousignant M, Moffet H, Boissy P et al (2011) A randomized controlled trial of home telerehabilitation for post-knee arthroplasty. J Telemed Telecare 17(4):195–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Dennett L (2011) Evidence of benefit from telerehabilitation in routine care: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 17(6):281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cottrell MA, Galea OA, O’Leary SP et al (2017) Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 31(5):625–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gilbert AW, Jaggi A, May CR (2018) What is the patient acceptability of real time 1: 1 videoconferencing in an orthopaedics setting? A systematic review Physiotherapy 104(2):178–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meijer HA, Graafland M, Goslings JC, Schijven MP (2018) Systematic review on the effects of serious games and wearable technology used in rehabilitation of patients with traumatic bone and soft tissue injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 99(9):1890–1899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dario AB, Cabral AM, Almeida L et al (2017) Effectiveness of telehealth-based interventions in the management of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. The Spine Journal 17(9):1342–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zadro JR, Shirley D, Simic M et al (2019) Video-game–based exercises for older people with chronic low back pain: a randomized Controlledtable trial (GAMEBACK). Phys Ther 99(1):14–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Geraghty AWA, Stanford R, Stuart B et al (2018) Using an internet intervention to support self-management of low back pain in primary care: findings from a randomised controlled feasibility trial (SupportBack). BMJ open 8(3):e016768

  19. Chhabra HS, Sharma S, Verma S (2018) Smartphone app in self-management of chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J 27(11):2862–2874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shebib R, Bailey JF, Smittenaar P et al (2019) Randomized controlled trial of a 12-week digital care program in improving low back pain. NPJ digital medicine 2(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fatoye F, Gebrye T, Fatoye C et al (2020) The clinical and cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 8(6):e15375

  22. Liu X, Faes L, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK (2019) Extension of the CONSORT and SPIRIT statements. The Lancet 394(10205):1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mbada CE, Olaoye MI, Dada OO et al (2019) Comparative efficacy of clinic-based and telerehabilitation application of Mckenzie therapy in chronic low-back pain. International Journal of Telerehabilitation 11(1):41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G* Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39(2):175–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Simmonds MJ, Olson SL, Jones S et al (1998) Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine 23(22):2412–2421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kane RL, Bershadsky B, Rockwood T et al (2005) Visual analog scale pain reporting was standardized. J Clin Epidemiol 58(6):618–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yakut E, Düger T, Öksüz Ç et al (2004) Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine 29(5):581–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Fişek G et al (1995) The reliability and validity of Turkish version of Short form 36 (SF 36). J Drug Treat 12:102–106

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yilmaz ÖT, Yakut Y, Uygur F, Uluğ N (2011) Tampa Kinezyofobi Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonu ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 22(1):44–49

    Google Scholar 

  30. Newman-Beinart NA, Norton S, Dowling D et al (2017) The development and initial psychometric evaluation of a measure assessing adherence to prescribed exercise: the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS). Physiotherapy 103(2):180–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Demirkol D, Şeneler Ç (2018) A Turkish translation of the system usability scale: The SUS-TR. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 11(3):237–253

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lewis JR (2018) The system usability scale: past, present, and future. Int J Hum-Comp Inter 34(7):577–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lizier DT, Perez MV, Sakata RK (2012) Exercises for nonspecific low back pain treatment. Rev Bras Anestesiol 62:842–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Parmanto B, Lewis AN Jr, Graham KM, Bertolet MH (2016) Development of the telehealth usability questionnaire (TUQ). Int J Telerehabilitation 8(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank İrem Çetinkaya, PT, PhD(c), for her valuable contribution in video-exercise protocol and recordings. We would like to thank Caner Özden, SSDE, who developed the software called Fizyoweb for this trial purely for academic purposes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatih Özden.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was carried out in accordance with the ethical principles and the Helsinki Declaration. Informed consent of the patients was obtained. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Marmara University (09.2020.518). The study protocol was registered (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04567758).

Consent to participate

Informed consent of the patients was obtained.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest and certify that no funding has been received for this study and/or the preparation of this manuscript. Fizyoweb is a web application fully developed for the academic purpose of this trial.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The above article was published online with error. The Ethical number found in page 3 of the proof has been captured twice. This should be corrected to “(No: 09.2020.518)”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özden, F., Sarı, Z., Karaman, Ö.N. et al. The effect of video exercise-based telerehabilitation on clinical outcomes, expectation, satisfaction, and motivation in patients with chronic low back pain. Ir J Med Sci 191, 1229–1239 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02727-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02727-8

Keywords

Navigation