Abstract
Aim
We aimed to evaluate the quality of information available on YouTube regarding the basic information, examination, diagnosis, and the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
Methods
A YouTube search was performed on https://www.youtube.com/ for videos pertaining to “retinopathy of prematurity” and “ROP.” The first 100 relevant videos were included in the study. Two ophthalmologist reviewers independently evaluated and classified the videos as useful or misleading. The videos were accepted as “useful,” if they provide scientifically correct information about any aspect of ROP: cause, pathogenesis, symptoms, findings, treatments, procedure details of the treatment, epidemiology, and prognosis. The videos contain scientifically unproven information are defined as “misleading.” Videos were also classified according to the source: surgeon/practitioner, independent user, hospital/free clinic, social media/TV, medical site, university, and advertisement.
Results
The mean duration, the mean days on YouTube, the mean comments per videos, and the mean dislikes per video were similar in useful and misleading videos. However, the mean likes per day, mean view per video, and mean view per day were significantly higher in useful videos than those of misleading videos (p = 0.004, p = 0.022, and p = 0.011, respectively). Most of the useful videos were uploaded by healthcare professionals including source from university, hospital/free clinic, and surgeon/practitioner (48/64). The videos uploaded by healthcare professionals were more useful compared to those of non-healthcare professionals (p = 0.029).
Conclusion
YouTube could be used as an important tool for patient information in ROP. However, one third of the YouTube videos regarding ROP are misleading and may present a risk of harmful consequences. In this aspect, authoritative videos by healthcare professionals should be uploaded for dissemination of reliable information on ROP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gilbert C, Fielder A, Gordillo L, Quinn G, Semiglia R, Visintin P, Zin A, International NO-ROP Group (2005) Characteristics of infants with severe retinopathy of prematurity in countries with low, moderate, and high levels of development: implications for screening programs. Pediatrics 115:e518–e525. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1180
Early Treatment For Retinopathy Of Prematurity Cooperative Group (2003) Revised indications for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: results of the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol 1960(121):1684–1694. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.121.12.1684
Naslund JA, Grande SW, Aschbrenner KA, Elwyn G (2014) Naturally occurring peer support through social media: the experiences of individuals with severe mental illness using YouTube. PLoS One 9:e110171. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110171
Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M (2013) Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One 8:e82469. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082469
Madden A, Ruthven I, McMenemy D (2013) A classification scheme for content analyses of YouTube video comments. J Doc 69:693–714
Rössler B, Lahner D, Schebesta K, Chiari A, Plöchl W (2012) Medical information on the Internet: quality assessment of lumbar puncture and neuroaxial block techniques on YouTube. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 114:655–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.12.048
Kumar N, Pandey A, Venkatraman A, Garg N (2014) Are video sharing web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? J Am Soc Hypertens 8:481–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jash.2014.05.001
Gabarron E, Fernandez-Luque L, Armayones M, Lau AY (2013) Identifying measures used for assessing quality of YouTube videos with patient health information: a review of current literature. Interact J Med Res 2:e6. https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.2465
Aykut A, Kukner AS, Karasu B, Palancıglu Y, Atmaca F, Aydogan T (2018) Everything is ok on YouTube! Quality assessment of YouTube videos on the topic of phacoemulsification in eyes with small pupil. Int Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0823-4
Bae SS, Baxter S (2017) YouTube videos in the English language as a patient education resource for cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0681-5
Guthrie G, Davies RM, Fleming CK, Browning AC (2014) YouTube as a source of information about retinitis pigmentosa. Eye Lond Engl 28:499–500. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2013.312
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Since the present study is an observational study as it involved the use of public access data only, there is no need for approval of the ethics committee.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
Since the present study is an observational study as it involved the use of public access data only, there is no need for informed consent.
Additional information
This paper has not been published nor submitted simultaneously for publication elsewhere.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Şahin, A., Şahin, M. & Türkcü, F.M. YouTube as a source of information in retinopathy of prematurity. Ir J Med Sci 188, 613–617 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1902-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1902-2