Abstract
Background
Integration of general practitioners (GPs) into a tertiary care team is a model used internationally to assist with provision of patient care. Symptomatic breast clinics have seen significant increases in attendances and consequential staffing issues. We wished to analyze the integration of GPs into a tertiary breast care team and establish whether their inclusion is a cost-effective approach.
Methods
A prospectively maintained database was used to identify 1614 new and 1453 review patients seen in the clinic between September and December 2013. The triple assessment clinical, radiological, and biopsy scores of patients assessed by GPs were compared to those assessed by registrars and to the overall number of patients seen. A cost analysis was performed based on the hourly rates of GPs and registrars.
Results
1614 new patients seen over the 4-month period. GPs reviewed a mean of 153.6 new patients and registrars reviewed a mean of 97.8. Registrars reviewed patients who were allocated higher ‘S’ scores, with 46 % of patients allocated an S4 and 21 % of patients allocated an S5 score. GPs reviewed a mean of 115.6 return patients and registrars reviewed a mean of 110.1 return patients. The weekly cost of employing 3 GPs for 15 h was €835. This compares favorably to the cost of employing a full-time registrar.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that GPs can play a substantial role in the provision of a symptomatic breast service. In addition, the incorporation of GPs in this setting can prove cost-effective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brennan M, Spillane A (2007) The breast physician: an example of specialisation in general practice. Med J Aust 187(2):111–114
Hartman J, Blue J (1997) The role of the breast physician in the multidisciplinary breast centre. N Z Med J 110(1037):39–41
Clarke D, Sudhakaran N, Gateley (2001) Replace fine needle aspiration cytology with automated core biopsy in the triple assessment of breast cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 83(2):110
Borrell-Carrió F, Suchman AL, Epstein RM (2004) The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med 2(6):576–582
Pinto AC (2013) Sexuality and breast cancer: prime time for young patients. J Thorac Dis 5(1):81–86
Salisbury C, Noble A et al (2005) Evaluation of a general practitioner with a special interest service for dermatology: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 331(7530):1441–1446
Coast J, Noble S et al (2005) Economic evaluation of a general practitioner with special interests led dermatology service in primary care. Br Med J 331:1444–1448
Nocon A, Rhodes PJ et al (2003) Specialist general practitioners and diabetes clinics in primary care: a qualitative and descriptive evaluation. Diabet Med 21:32–38
Dhumale R (2004) Feasibility study of hernia surgery in a general practice setting. Br J Gen Pract 54(505):604–607
Nocon A, Leese B (2004) The role of UK general practitioners with special clinical interests: implications for policy and service delivery. Br J Gen Pract 54:50–56
Gerada C, Wright N (2002) The general practitioner with a special interest: new opportunities or the end of the generalist practitioner? Br J Gen Pract 52(483):796–798
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beecher, S.M., Donlan, C., O’Leary, D.P. et al. Clinical and economic benefit of general practitioner integration to a symptomatic breast service. Ir J Med Sci 185, 877–880 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-015-1386-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-015-1386-2