Abstract
Background
Low birth weight (LBW) is a leading cause of infant mortality and morbidity, and a specific risk for the development of neuro-developmental and academic problems.
Aim
To examine the medical, cognitive and academic outcomes of VLBW (<1,500 g) children, born in one maternity hospital in Dublin between 1995 and 1997.
Methods
The study employed a prospective/cohort design, with semi-structured, and standardised measures, along with the completion of a study-specific questionnaire. Ratings were obtained from parents and teachers.
Results
Of the 127 surviving VLBW cohort, 64 (50 %) consented to assessment at a mean age of 11.6 years (SD 1.0) along with a matched-weight and gender control sample of 51. VLBW children had an increased risk of chronic medical problems and neuro-sensory deficits, but without any increased use in services. Similarly, they had lower IQ (mean 89.7 compared to NBW 101.3, p < 0.001) and more were identified by teachers to have special education needs (33 % VLBW vs. 7 % NBW, p < 0.005). With regard to academic attainments, birth weight had a significant [t(98) = −4.54, p < 0.001] and robust effect (η2 = 0.17) on mathematical attainment scores. Those with lower SES fared least well off.
Conclusions
Although significant advances have been made in reducing infant mortality, there is a recognised increased risk of subsequent disability especially with decreasing gestational age, and when coupled with low SES. Having facilitated the survival of vulnerable infants, services must be available for the necessary on-going medical and educational support and treatment that they require throughout adolescent years.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF (2007) Low birth weight in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 85(2):584S–590S
European Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants (2011) EU Bench Marketing Report 2009–2010. Too little—too late why Europe should do more for preterm babies? http://www.EFCNI.org
MacDorman MF, Minino AM, Strobino DM et al (2002) Annual summary of vital statistics 2001. Pediatrics 110(6):1037–1052
Vavasseur A (2007) Consensus statements on the borderlands of neonatal viability: from uncertainty to grey areas. Ir Med J 100(8):561–564
Mercier E, Dunn S, The Vermont Oxford Network ELBW Follow-up Study Group et al (2010) Neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely low birth weight infants from the Vermont Oxford Network: 1988–2003. Neonatology 97(4):329–338
Marlow N (2004) Neurocognitive outcome after very preterm birth. Arch Dis Child 89(3):F224–F228
Hack M, Taylor H, Drotar D et al (2005) Chronic conditions, functional limitations, and special health care needs of school-aged children born with extremely low-birth-weight in the 1990s. JAMA 294(3):318–325
Rickards A, Kelly E, Doyle L (2001) Cognition, academic progress, behavior and self-concept at 14 years of very low birth weight children. J Devel Behav Pediatr 22(1):1–18
Costeloe K, Hennessy E, Gibson T et al (2000) The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for babies born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 106:659–671
Johnson S, Hennessy E, Smith R et al (2009) Academic attainment and special educational needs in extremely preterm children at 11 years of age: the EPICure Study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 94:283–289
Fawke J, Lum S, Kirkby J et al (2010) Function and respiratory symptoms at 11 years in children born extremely preterm. The EPICure study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 182:237–245
Health Research and Information Division. (2012) The Economic and Social Research Institute (ERSI) Perinatal Statistics Report 2011. (http://www.esri.ie/health_information/latest_hipe_nprs_reports) Accessed Feb 2013
Statistics, Office. The National Statistics Socio-economic classification: User manual. 2005, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire
Platt J, Cans C, Johnson A et al (2007) Trends in cerebral palsy among infants of very low birthweight (<1500 g) or born prematurely (<32 weeks) in 16 European centres: a database study. Lancet 369(9555):43–50
Wood N, Gibson A, Marlow N et al (2005) The EPICure study: perinatal antecedents and correlates of disability in extremely preterm children. Arch Dis Child 90:134–140
Marlow N, Hennessy EM, Bracewell MA et al (2007) Motor and executive function at 6 years of age after extremely preterm birth. Pediatrics 120(4):793–804
Samara M, Johnson S, Lamberts K et al (2010) Eating problems at six years of age in a whole population sample of children born at 25 weeks of gestation or less. Dev Med Child Neurol 52(2):e16–e22
Saigal S, Stoskopf B, Streiner D et al (2001) Physical growth and current health status of infants who were of extremely low birth weight and controls at adolescence. Pediatrics 108(2):407–415
Hack M, Flannery J, Schluchter M et al (2002) Outcomes in young adulthood for very-low-birth-weight infants. New Engl J Med 346(3):149–157
Voss D, Sandberg D (2004) The psychological burden of short stature: evidence against. Eur J Endocrinol 151:29–33
Saigal S, Lambert M, Russ C et al (2002) Self-esteem of adolescents who were born prematurely. Pediatrics 109(3):429–433
Stein MT (2004) Parent requests growth hormone for child with idiopathic short stature. J Devel Behav Pediatr 25(2):105–109
Wolke D (1998) Psychological development of prematurely born children. Arch Dis Child 78:567–570
Cnattingius S, Hultman CM, Dahl M et al (1999) Very preterm birth, birth trauma, and the risk of anorexia nervosa among girls. Arch Gen Psych 56(7):634–638
Blond AI, Feldman JF, Lorenz JM et al (2008) Eating attitudes and weight concerns in female low birth weight adolescents. Int J Eat Disord 41:573–575
Blond A, Whitaker AH, Lorenz JM et al (2008) Weight concerns in male low birth weight adolescents: relation to body mass index, self-esteem, and depression. J Devel Behav Pediatr 29:166–172
Saigal S, Stoskopf B, Boyle M et al (2007) Comparison of current health, functional limitations and healthcare use of young adults who were born extremely low birthweight and normal birthweight. Pediatrics 119:e562–e573
Petrou S (2003) Economic consequences of preterm birth and low birthweight. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 110:17–23. doi:10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.00013.x
Saigal S, Hoult LA, Streiner DL et al (2000) School difficulties at adolescence in a regional cohort of children who were extremely low birth weight. Pediatrics 105(2):325–331
Williams J, Greene S, Doyle E et al (2009) Growing up in Ireland: National longitudinal study of children. The lives of 9 year olds, Dublin, The Stationery Office, Dublin
McAvoy H, Sturley J, Burke S et al (2006) Unequal at birth: Inequalities in the occurrence of low birth weight babies in Ireland. National Perinatal Reporting System 1991–2001 ERHA
Silva A, Metha Z, O’Callaghan F (2006) The relative effect of size at birth, postnatal growth and social factors on cognitive function in late childhood. Ann Epidemiol 16:469–476
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by a research grant from St. John of God Hospital research committee.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McNicholas, F., Healy, E., White, M. et al. Medical, cognitive and academic outcomes of very low birth weight infants at age 10–14 years in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 183, 525–532 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-013-1040-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-013-1040-9