Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Towards vertical integration in general practice education: literature review and discussion paper

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Medical education policy in Ireland has enabled an increase in undergraduate and postgraduate education activity in general practice. Internationally, ‘vertical integration in general practice education’ is suggested as a key strategy to support the implementation of this policy development.

Aims

To review the emerging literature on vertical integration in GP education, specifically to define the concept of ‘vertical integration’ with regard to education in general practice and to describe its benefits and challenges.

Methods

We searched ‘Pubmed’, ‘Academic Search Complete’, ‘Google’, and ‘MEDLINE’ databases using multiple terms related to ‘vertical integration’ and ‘general practice education’ for relevant articles published since 2001. Discussion papers, reports, policy documents and position statements were identified from reference lists and retrieved through internet searches.

Results

The key components of ‘vertical integration’ in GP education include continuous educational pathway, all stages in GP education, supporting the continuing educational/professional development needs of learners at each stage and effective curriculum planning and delivery. Many benefits (for GPs, learners and the community) and many challenges (for GPs/practices, learners and GPs in training) have been described. Characteristics of successful implementation include role sharing and collaborative organisational structures.

Conclusions

Recent developments in medical education in Ireland, such as the increase in medical school clinical placements in general practice and postgraduate GP training and the introduction of new competence assurance requirements offer an important opportunity to further inform how vertical integration can support increased educational activity in general practice. Describing this model, recognising its benefits and challenges and supporting its implementation in practice are priorities for medical education in Ireland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Future of General Practice Education and Training System (2009) Discussion Paper. Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine (ACRRM), General Practice Education and Training Ltd (GPET), General Practice Registrars Australia Ltd (GPRA), Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP)

  2. Thistlethwaite JE, Kidd MR, Hudson JN (2007) General practice: a leading provider of medical student education in the 21st century? Med J Aust 187(2):124–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morrison J, Watt G (2003) New century, new challenges for community based medical education. Med Educ 37(1):2–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Howe A, Campion P, Searle J, Smith H (2004) New perspectives—approaches to medical education at four new UK medical schools. BMJ (Clin res ed) 329(7461):327–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Worley P, Prideaux D, Strasser R, Magarey A, March R (2006) Empirical evidence for symbiotic medical education: a comparative analysis of community and tertiary-based programmes. Med Educ 40(2):109–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Worley P, Strasser R, Prideaux D (2004) Can medical students learn specialist disciplines based in rural practice: lessons from students’ self reported experience and competence. Rural Remote Health 4(4):338

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Worley P, Martin A, Prideaux D, Woodman R, Worley E, Lowe M (2008) Vocational career paths of graduate entry medical students at Flinders University: a comparison of rural, remote and tertiary tracks. Med J Aust 188(3):177–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Worley P, Esterman A, Prideaux D (2004) Cohort study of examination performance of undergraduate medical students learning in community settings. BMJ (Clin res ed) 328(7433):207–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oswald N, Alderson T, Jones S (2001) Evaluating primary care as a base for medical education: the report of the Cambridge Community-based Clinical Course. Med Educ 35(8):782–788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Preparing Ireland’s Doctors to meet the Health Needs of the 21st Century (2006). Report of the Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Group (the “Buttimer Report”). Department of Health and Children, Dublin

  11. Medical Education in Ireland: A New Direction (Fottrell Report) (2006). Department of Health and Children, Dublin

  12. Hays R (2008) Evolving community-based medical education: integrating undergraduate and postgraduate education. Educ Prim Care 19(3):235–240

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dick ML, King DB, Mitchell GK, Kelly GD, Buckley JF, Garside SJ (2007) Vertical Integration in Teaching And Learning (VITAL): an approach to medical education in general practice. Med J Aust 187(2):133–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ni Chroinin D, Kyne L, Duggan J, Last J, Molphy A, O’Shea D et al (2012) Medicine in the community: a unique partnership. Clin Teach 9(3):158–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. ‘Extended’ General Practice course: initial experience at a graduate entry medical school.(2010). Irish Network of Medical Educators, Galway

  16. Cullen W, Burns C, Culhane A, Davoren P, Fahey C (2012) The medical school and Irish general practice—the enduring partnership continues. Forum 29(2):10–12

    Google Scholar 

  17. Buehler S, Schmutzler A (2008) Intimidating competitors—endogenous vertical integration and downstream investment in successive oligopoly. Int J Ind Organ 26(1):247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kennedy EM (2006) Beyond vertical integration—community based medical education. Aust Fam Physician 35(11):901

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomson J (2003) A framework for vertical integration in general practice education and training. General Practice Education and Training Ltd., Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vertical integration.(2009) Western Australian General Practice Education and Training (WAGPET) Ltd, Bentley, WA

  21. Birks J, Farrell E, Newson A (2004) Flexible teaching and learning in general practice. Aust Fam Physician 33(9):687–689

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lake FR (2004) Teaching on the run tips: doctors as teachers. Med J Aust 180(8):415–416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomson J, Anderson K (2009) Vertical integration. Aust Fam Physician 38(11):907

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stocks NP, Frank O, Linn AM, Anderson K, Meertens S (2011) Vertical integration of teaching in Australian general practice–a survey of regional training providers. Med J Aust 194(11):S75–S78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sturman N, Rego P, Dick ML (2011) Rewards, costs and challenges: the general practitioner’s experience of teaching medical students. Med Educ 45(7):722–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Glasgow NJ, Trumble S (2003) Final report on the case studies on vertical integration for the AAAGP/ADGP GPET working party. General Practice Education and Training, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dahle LO, Brynhildsen J, Behrbohm Fallsberg M, Rundquist I, Hammar M (2002) Pros and cons of vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum: examples and experiences from Linkoping, Sweden. Med Teach 24(3):280–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Brynhildsen J, Dahle LO, Behrbohm Fallsberg M, Rundquist I, Hammar M (2002) Behrbohm Fallsberg M, Rundquist I, Hammar M. Attitudes among students and teachers on vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Teach 24(3):286–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wijnen-Meijer M, ten Cate OT, van der Schaaf M, Borleffs JC (2010) Vertical integration in medical school: effect on the transition to postgraduate training. Med Educ 44(3):272–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Response to the Department of Education, Science and Training Medical Education Study.(2006). The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners

  31. Johnson C, Siaw-Teng L, McNair R, Poliness E, Trumble S, Tse J (2003) INTERACT-integrating registrars as clinical teachers (Pilot Study). A vertical integration strategy (Final Report)

  32. Dodd J, Vickery A, van Osch H, Emery J (2009) General practice registrar teaching role—is there a need for shared understanding? Aust Fam Physician 38(1–2):77–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sturman N, Régo P, Dick ML (2011) Rewards, costs and challenges: the general practitioner’s experience of teaching medical students. Med Educ 45(7):722–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mathers J, Parry J, Lewis S, Greenfield S (2004) What impact will an increased number of teaching general practices have on patients, doctors and medical students? Med Educ 38(12):1219–1228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Finucane P, Arnett R, Johnson A, Waters M (2008) Graduate medical education in Ireland: a profile of the first cohort of students. Ir J Med Sci 177(1):19–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Finucane P, Shannon W, McGrath D (2009) The financial costs of delivering problem-based learning in a new, graduate-entry medical programme. Med Educ 43(6):594–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cullen W, Molphy A, Harkin P, Last J, Bury G (2010) Implications for clinical infrastructure associated with increasing student learning in general practice. Irish Network of Medical Educators, Galway

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cantillon P, Macdermott M (2008) Does responsibility drive learning? Lessons from intern rotations in general practice. Med Teach 30(3):254–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. O’Shea EB (2009) What’s another year? A qualitative evaluation of extension of general practice training in the West of Ireland. Educ Prim Care 20(3):159–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Shea EE (2009) Extension of training for general practice: a review of the evidence. Educ Prim Care 20(1):15–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Health Services Executive (Medical Education Training Directorate) who funded this study and our colleagues Prof Paul Finucane, Prof Bill Shannon, Ms Michelle Murnane, Dr Gary Stack, Dr Lucia Gannon, Dr Manus McGuire, Dr Lisa Murphy, Dr David Moloney, Dr Joseph Arthurs and Dr Billy O’Connell whose advice on planning this study was invaluable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Cullen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Regan, A., Culhane, A., Dunne, C. et al. Towards vertical integration in general practice education: literature review and discussion paper. Ir J Med Sci 182, 319–324 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-012-0893-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-012-0893-7

Keywords

Navigation