Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Barriers to the reporting and management of needlestick injuries among surgeons

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Needlestick injuries are common within surgical practice and carry the risk of transmission of blood borne viruses. Key to reducing this risk is an accessible system of reporting and involvement of occupational health services. We aimed to identify surgeons’ attitude and experience dealing with such injuries and identify why in many cases needlestick injuries go unreported.

Methods

70 questionnaires were hand delivered to surgeons and trainees across 3 UK hospitals and a variety of surgical specialties. The number of injuries and reporting practice was identified. Surgeons were asked to identify from a list the reasons why they did not report their injuries and record importance on a 5-point scale (0–4).

Results

52 surgeons and trainees replied (75%). 42 (81%) had suffered at least 1 needlestick injury with 4 (8%) reporting more than 20. 8 (19%) had reported all their injuries to occupational health with no significant difference in reporting between consultants and trainees (P = 0.2). 12 (23%) felt that reporting of injuries helped to reduce transmission rates. 18 (35%) said that a needlestick had caused them moderate or significant anxiety. The top reasons for not reporting were (0–4). (1) Process too time consuming (2.7), (2) transmission risk very low (2.6), (3) do not want to disrupt operating list (2.0), (4) post exposure prophylaxis ineffective (1.3).

Conclusions

Most surgeons and trainees do not report all their needlestick injuries to occupational health despite many reporting injury related anxiety. The process is felt to take too long and the perceived risk of viral transmission is low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tansley PDT, Beresford N, Ladas G, Goldstraw P, Dusmet M (2004) Infection of patients by bloodborne viruses. Br J Surg 91:395–399. doi:10.1002/bjs.4546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sulkowski M, Ray S, Thomas D (2002) Needlestick transmission of Hepatitis C. JAMA 287:2406–2413. doi:10.1001/jama.287.18.2406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gerberding JL (2003) Occupational exposure to HIV in health care settings. N Engl J Med 348:826–832. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp020892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tokar JL, Bell DM, Culvery DH (1992) Percutaneous injuries during surgical procedures. JAMA 267:2899–2904. doi:10.1001/jama.267.21.2899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee L, Yu C, Wang JD (2001) J Occup Health 43:278–280. doi:10.1539/joh.43.278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Duff SE, Wong CKM, May RE (1999) Surgeons’ and occupational health departments’ awareness of guidelines on post-exposure prophylaxis for staff exposed to HIV: telephone survey. BMJ 319:162–178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Caillot JL, Voigloi EJ, Gilly FN, Fabry J (2000) The occupational viral risk run by French surgeons: a disturbing perspective. Correspondence. AIDS 14(13):2061. doi:10.1097/00002030-200009080-00030

  8. Wilburn S, Eijkemans G (2004) Preventing needlestick injuries among healthcare workers: A WHO-ICN Collaboration. Int J Occup Environ Health 10:451–456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. The Senate of Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland. Blood borne viruses and their implications for surgical practice and training. Senate Paper 4—September 1998

  10. UK Department of Health Document. “Guidance on Clinical Healthcare Workers: Protection against infection with blood borne viruses”

  11. Updated US (2001) Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to HBV, HCV and HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 50(RR-11):1–52

  12. Jefferies D (1995) Surgery and bloodborne viruses. Public Health Lab Serv Microbiol Dig 12:150–154

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lauer G, Walker B, Hepatitis C (2001) Virus Infection. N Engl J Med 345:41–52. doi:10.1056/NEJM200107053450107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Makary M, Al-Attar A, Holzmueller CG, Sexton JB et al (2007) Needlestick injuries among surgeons in training. N Engl J Med 356:2693–2699. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Kennedy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, R., Kelly, S., Gonsalves, S. et al. Barriers to the reporting and management of needlestick injuries among surgeons. Ir J Med Sci 178, 297–299 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0359-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0359-8

Keywords

Navigation