Abstract
Objective
Needlestick injuries are common within surgical practice and carry the risk of transmission of blood borne viruses. Key to reducing this risk is an accessible system of reporting and involvement of occupational health services. We aimed to identify surgeons’ attitude and experience dealing with such injuries and identify why in many cases needlestick injuries go unreported.
Methods
70 questionnaires were hand delivered to surgeons and trainees across 3 UK hospitals and a variety of surgical specialties. The number of injuries and reporting practice was identified. Surgeons were asked to identify from a list the reasons why they did not report their injuries and record importance on a 5-point scale (0–4).
Results
52 surgeons and trainees replied (75%). 42 (81%) had suffered at least 1 needlestick injury with 4 (8%) reporting more than 20. 8 (19%) had reported all their injuries to occupational health with no significant difference in reporting between consultants and trainees (P = 0.2). 12 (23%) felt that reporting of injuries helped to reduce transmission rates. 18 (35%) said that a needlestick had caused them moderate or significant anxiety. The top reasons for not reporting were (0–4). (1) Process too time consuming (2.7), (2) transmission risk very low (2.6), (3) do not want to disrupt operating list (2.0), (4) post exposure prophylaxis ineffective (1.3).
Conclusions
Most surgeons and trainees do not report all their needlestick injuries to occupational health despite many reporting injury related anxiety. The process is felt to take too long and the perceived risk of viral transmission is low.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tansley PDT, Beresford N, Ladas G, Goldstraw P, Dusmet M (2004) Infection of patients by bloodborne viruses. Br J Surg 91:395–399. doi:10.1002/bjs.4546
Sulkowski M, Ray S, Thomas D (2002) Needlestick transmission of Hepatitis C. JAMA 287:2406–2413. doi:10.1001/jama.287.18.2406
Gerberding JL (2003) Occupational exposure to HIV in health care settings. N Engl J Med 348:826–832. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp020892
Tokar JL, Bell DM, Culvery DH (1992) Percutaneous injuries during surgical procedures. JAMA 267:2899–2904. doi:10.1001/jama.267.21.2899
Lee L, Yu C, Wang JD (2001) J Occup Health 43:278–280. doi:10.1539/joh.43.278
Duff SE, Wong CKM, May RE (1999) Surgeons’ and occupational health departments’ awareness of guidelines on post-exposure prophylaxis for staff exposed to HIV: telephone survey. BMJ 319:162–178
Caillot JL, Voigloi EJ, Gilly FN, Fabry J (2000) The occupational viral risk run by French surgeons: a disturbing perspective. Correspondence. AIDS 14(13):2061. doi:10.1097/00002030-200009080-00030
Wilburn S, Eijkemans G (2004) Preventing needlestick injuries among healthcare workers: A WHO-ICN Collaboration. Int J Occup Environ Health 10:451–456
The Senate of Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland. Blood borne viruses and their implications for surgical practice and training. Senate Paper 4—September 1998
UK Department of Health Document. “Guidance on Clinical Healthcare Workers: Protection against infection with blood borne viruses”
Updated US (2001) Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to HBV, HCV and HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 50(RR-11):1–52
Jefferies D (1995) Surgery and bloodborne viruses. Public Health Lab Serv Microbiol Dig 12:150–154
Lauer G, Walker B, Hepatitis C (2001) Virus Infection. N Engl J Med 345:41–52. doi:10.1056/NEJM200107053450107
Makary M, Al-Attar A, Holzmueller CG, Sexton JB et al (2007) Needlestick injuries among surgeons in training. N Engl J Med 356:2693–2699. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070378
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kennedy, R., Kelly, S., Gonsalves, S. et al. Barriers to the reporting and management of needlestick injuries among surgeons. Ir J Med Sci 178, 297–299 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0359-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0359-8