Abstract
Background
With the growing demand on endoscopy services, optimising practice efficiency has assumed increasing importance. Prior research has identified practice changes, which increase the efficiency in endoscopy. In this study, the potential impact of these practice changes on the current and projected future endoscopy waiting times at our institution was assessed.
Methods
The annual volume of endoscopic procedures performed at a major teaching hospital and the annual procedure demand from 2000 to 2007 were reviewed. Procedure demand and waiting times were projected until 2012. The impact of three practice changes, which have been shown to increase efficiency was assessed: 1. routinely obtaining IV access and consent in patients prior to endoscopy (approach 1); 2. routinely obtaining IV access and consent, and sedating the patient prior to endoscopy (approach 2); 3. utilizing a two-room per endoscopist model (approach 3).
Results
There has been a significant increase in annual procedure volume (36%) and annual procedure demand (69%) from 2000 to 2007. Annual waiting times for routine procedures have lengthened, from 6 weeks (2000) to 22 weeks (2007). Assuming continued linear growth in demand up to 2012, the projected waiting times will continue to rise reaching 40 weeks in 2012.
Routinely obtaining IV access/consent prior to procedure (approach 1) would shorten the average routine waiting times so that 8 weeks (recommended HSE maximum) would not be exceeded until early 2006; routinely obtaining IV access/consent and sedating patient prior to procedure (approach 2) would shorten the average routine waiting time so that 8 weeks would not be exceeded until 2008; utilising two rooms per endoscopist (approach 3) would shorten the average routine waiting time so that 8 weeks would not be exceeded until early 2012.
Conclusions
Maintaining timely access to endoscopic services is becoming more challenging in the face of growing demand. Modifications in routine clinical practice can significantly impact procedure waiting times. In an era where economic aspects of medical care are becoming increasingly important and where there is growing focus on waiting times as a measure of clinical performance, these findings underscore the importance of providing clinical care in the most efficient manner possible.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Phillips KA, Liang SY, Ladabaum U et al (2007) Trends in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Med Care 45:160–167. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000246612.35245.21
Ko CW, Kreuter W, Baldwin LM (2002) Effect of Medicare coverage on use of invasive colorectal cancer screening tests. Arch Intern Med 162:2581–2586. doi:10.1001/archinte.162.22.2581
Harewood GC, Chrysostomou K, Himy N, Leong WL (2008) A ‘time and motion’ study of endoscopic practice: strategies to enhance efficiency. Gastrointest Endosc 68:1043–1050
Raje D, La Touche S, Mukhtar H, Oshowo A, Ingham Clark C (2006) Changing trends in the management of colorectal cancers and its impact on cancer waiting times. Colorectal Dis 8:140–144. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00915.x
Porrett TR, Lunniss PJ (2004) Paper clinics: a model for improving delivery of outpatient colorectal services. Colorectal Dis 6:268–274. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00640.x
Yu D, Hopman WM, Paterson WG (2008) Wait time for endoscopic evaluation at a Canadian tertiary care centre: comparison with Canadian Association of Gastroenterology targets. Can J Gastroenterol 22:621–626
Viiala CH, Tang KW, Lawrance IC, Murray K, Olynyk JK (2007) Waiting time for colonoscopy and colorectal cancer diagnosis. Med J Aust 186:282–285
Zamir S, Rex DK (2002) An initial investigation of efficiency in endoscopy delivery. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1968–1972. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05909.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harewood, G.C., Ryan, H., Murray, F. et al. Potential impact of enhanced practice efficiency on endoscopy waiting times. Ir J Med Sci 178, 187–192 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-008-0271-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-008-0271-7