Skip to main content
Log in

Potential impact of enhanced practice efficiency on endoscopy waiting times

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

With the growing demand on endoscopy services, optimising practice efficiency has assumed increasing importance. Prior research has identified practice changes, which increase the efficiency in endoscopy. In this study, the potential impact of these practice changes on the current and projected future endoscopy waiting times at our institution was assessed.

Methods

The annual volume of endoscopic procedures performed at a major teaching hospital and the annual procedure demand from 2000 to 2007 were reviewed. Procedure demand and waiting times were projected until 2012. The impact of three practice changes, which have been shown to increase efficiency was assessed: 1. routinely obtaining IV access and consent in patients prior to endoscopy (approach 1); 2. routinely obtaining IV access and consent, and sedating the patient prior to endoscopy (approach 2); 3. utilizing a two-room per endoscopist model (approach 3).

Results

There has been a significant increase in annual procedure volume (36%) and annual procedure demand (69%) from 2000 to 2007. Annual waiting times for routine procedures have lengthened, from 6 weeks (2000) to 22 weeks (2007). Assuming continued linear growth in demand up to 2012, the projected waiting times will continue to rise reaching 40 weeks in 2012.

Routinely obtaining IV access/consent prior to procedure (approach 1) would shorten the average routine waiting times so that 8 weeks (recommended HSE maximum) would not be exceeded until early 2006; routinely obtaining IV access/consent and sedating patient prior to procedure (approach 2) would shorten the average routine waiting time so that 8 weeks would not be exceeded until 2008; utilising two rooms per endoscopist (approach 3) would shorten the average routine waiting time so that 8 weeks would not be exceeded until early 2012.

Conclusions

Maintaining timely access to endoscopic services is becoming more challenging in the face of growing demand. Modifications in routine clinical practice can significantly impact procedure waiting times. In an era where economic aspects of medical care are becoming increasingly important and where there is growing focus on waiting times as a measure of clinical performance, these findings underscore the importance of providing clinical care in the most efficient manner possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Phillips KA, Liang SY, Ladabaum U et al (2007) Trends in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Med Care 45:160–167. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000246612.35245.21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ko CW, Kreuter W, Baldwin LM (2002) Effect of Medicare coverage on use of invasive colorectal cancer screening tests. Arch Intern Med 162:2581–2586. doi:10.1001/archinte.162.22.2581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harewood GC, Chrysostomou K, Himy N, Leong WL (2008) A ‘time and motion’ study of endoscopic practice: strategies to enhance efficiency. Gastrointest Endosc 68:1043–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Raje D, La Touche S, Mukhtar H, Oshowo A, Ingham Clark C (2006) Changing trends in the management of colorectal cancers and its impact on cancer waiting times. Colorectal Dis 8:140–144. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00915.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Porrett TR, Lunniss PJ (2004) Paper clinics: a model for improving delivery of outpatient colorectal services. Colorectal Dis 6:268–274. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00640.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu D, Hopman WM, Paterson WG (2008) Wait time for endoscopic evaluation at a Canadian tertiary care centre: comparison with Canadian Association of Gastroenterology targets. Can J Gastroenterol 22:621–626

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Viiala CH, Tang KW, Lawrance IC, Murray K, Olynyk JK (2007) Waiting time for colonoscopy and colorectal cancer diagnosis. Med J Aust 186:282–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zamir S, Rex DK (2002) An initial investigation of efficiency in endoscopy delivery. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1968–1972. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05909.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. C. Harewood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harewood, G.C., Ryan, H., Murray, F. et al. Potential impact of enhanced practice efficiency on endoscopy waiting times. Ir J Med Sci 178, 187–192 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-008-0271-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-008-0271-7

Keywords

Navigation