Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Stakeholder Perceptions of White Oak Supply in Kentucky: A SWOT-AHP Analysis

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Growing demand for white oak (Quercus alba) timber and difficulties in regenerating this species point toward future supply issues. Implementing forest policy and management interventions to support its long-term supply will be necessary particularly in Kentucky, where bourbon industry relies solely on casks made from white oak. To increase the probability that these actions will be successful, it is advisable to consider perceptions of stakeholders who are most likely to be involved with and impacted by those decisions. The combined Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat and Analytic Hierarchy Process technique used in this study facilitated independent capturing and ranking of perceptions from three key stakeholder groups (members of woodland owners, forest industry, and distillers industry associations) regarding long-term supply of white oak. The results of this study suggest implementing forest policy and management decisions that have the most support among stakeholders to ensure long-term sustainable supply of white oak are: (1) encourage and incentivize sustainable forest management, and (2) address poor harvesting practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams MD (2003) Where has all the white oak gone? Bioscience 53(10):927–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht G, Sartore GM, Connor L, Higginbotham N, Freeman S, Kelly B, Stain H, Tonna A, Pollard G (2007) Solastalgia: the distress caused by environmental change. Australas Psychiatry 15(sup1):S95–S98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach RH, PattanayakYangMurrayAbt SKJCBCRC (2005) Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management: a review and synthesis. For Policy Econ 7(3):261–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F (2012) Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. EcolLett 15(4):365–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. EcolAppl 10(5):1251–1262

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett NJ (2016) Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. ConservBiol 30(3):582–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandeis TJ (2017) Partial Harvesting of Hardwood Sawtimber in Kentucky and Tennessee, 2002–2014. Gen Tech Rep 227:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler BJ, Butler SM, Caputo J, Dias J, Robillard A, Sass EM (2020) Family forest ownerships of the United States, 2018: Results from the USDA Forest Service, National Woodland Owner Survey. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-199. Madison, WI: the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. P 56. https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-199

  • Butler BJ, Butler SM (2016). Family forest ownerships with 10+ acres in Kentucky, 2011–2013. Res. Note NRS-217. Newtown Square, PA: the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. p 2. https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-RN-217.

  • Butler BJ, Hewes JH, Dickinson BJ, Andrejczyk K, Butler SM, Markowski-Lindsay M (2016) Family forest ownerships of the United States, 2013: findings from the USDA forest service’s national woodland owner survey. J For 114(6):638–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler BJ, Markowski-Lindsay M, Snyder S, Catanzaro P, Kittredge DB, Andrejczyk K, Dickinson BJ, Eryilmaz D, Hewes JH, Randler P, Tadle D, Kilgore MA (2014) Effectiveness of landowner assistance activities: an examination of the USDA forest service’s forest stewardship program. J For 112(2):187–197. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.13-066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler BJ, Tyrrell ML, Feinberg G, VanManen S, Wiseman L, Wallinger S (2007) Understanding and reaching family forest owners: lessons from social marketing research. J For 102(7):348–357

  • Coomes P, Kornstein B (2019) The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of the distillers Industry in Kentucky. Report prepared for the Kentucky distillers’ Association. January 30, 2019. Pp 62

  • Dey DC (2014) Sustaining oak forests in eastern North America: regeneration and recruitment, the pillars of sustainability. For Sci 60(5):926–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhubháin ÁN, Maguire K, Farrelly N (2010) The harvesting behaviour of Irish private forest owners. For Policy Econ 12(7):513–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi P, Alavalapati JRR (2009) Stakeholders’ perceptions on forest biomass-based bioenergy development in the southern US. Energy Policy 37:1999–2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi P, Jagadish A, Schelhas J (2016) Perceptions of stakeholder groups about the participation of African American family forest landowners in federal landowner assistance programs. J For 114(2):89–96. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.14-152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson RG (2004) Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick. Eur J Op Res 153(3):631–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson DL, Ryan RL, De Young R, Planning U (2002) Woodlots in the rural landscape: landowner motivations and management attitudes in a Michigan (USA) case study. Landsc Urban Plan 58(2–4):101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floress K, Huff ES, Snyder SA, Koshollek A, Butler S, Allred SB (2019) Factors associated with family forest owner actions: a vote-count meta-analysis. Landsc Urban Plan 188:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Görener A, Toker K, Uluçay K (2012) Application of combined SWOT and AHP: a case study for a manufacturing firm. Proc-SocBehavSci 58:1525–1534

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendee JT, Flint CG (2013) Managing private forestlands along the public-private interface of Southern Illinois: landowner forestry decisions in a multi-jurisdictional landscape. For Policy Econ 34:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilgore MA, Snyder SA, Eryilmaz D, Markowski-Lindsay MA, Butler BJ, Kittredge DB, Catanzaro PF, Hewes JH, Andrejczyk K (2015) Assessing the relationship between different forms of landowner assistance and family forest owner behaviors and intentions. J For 113(1):12–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgore MA, Snyder S, Taff S, Schertz J (2008) Family forest stewardship: Do owners need a financial incentive? J For 106(7):357–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Houben G, Lenie K, Vanhoof K (1999) A knowledge-based SWOT-analysis system as an instrument for strategic planning in small and medium sized enterprises. Decis Support Syst 26(2):125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurttila M, Pesonen M, Kangas J, Kajanus M (2000) Utilizing the analytic Hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis: a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. For Policy Econ 1(1):41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lallo GD, Maesano M, Masiero M, Mugnozza GS, Marchetti M (2016) Analyzing strategies to enhance small and low intensity managed forests certification in Europe using SWOT-ANP. Small-scale For 15(3):393–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-016-9329-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z, Kittredge DB (2011) How family forest owners consider timber harvesting, land sale, and conservation easement decisions: Insights from Massachusetts, USA. Int J For Res 2011:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar I, Laband D, Teeter L, Butler B (2009) Motivations and land-use intentions of nonindustrial private forest landowners: comparing inheritors to noninheritors. For Sci 55(5):423–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Masozera MK, Alavalapati JR, Jacobson SK, Shrestha RK (2006) Assessing the suitability of community-based management for the Nyungwe Forest Reserve. Rwanda For Policy Econ 8(2):206–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles PD (2018). EVALIDator Version 1.6.0.03a. The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, St. Paul, MN. Available online at http://apps.fs.fed.us/Evalidator/evalidator.jsp. Accessed 17 December 2018

  • Mollenhorst H, de Boer IJM (2004) Identifying sustainability issues using participatory SWOT analysis: a case study of egg production in the Netherlands. Outlook Agric 33(4):267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair KGK, Prasad PN (2004) Offshore outsourcing: a SWOT analysis of a state in India. InfSystManag 21(3):34–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Narendra BH, Roshetko JM, Tata HL, Mulyoutami E (2012) Prioritizing underutilized tree species for domestication in smallholder systems of West Java. Small-scale For 12(4):519–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-012-9227-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman WL (2011) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches, 7th edn. Pearson, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswalt SN, Smith BW, Miles PD, Pugh SA (2019) Forest Resources of the United States, 2017: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2020 RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-97. Washington, DC: the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. 237p. https://doi.org/10.2737/WO-GTR-97

  • Pickens J (2005) Attitudes and perceptions. Organizational Behavior in Health Care. 43–76.

  • Perez-Garcia J, Joyce LA, McGuire AD, Xiao X (2002) Impacts of climate change on the global forest sector. Clim Chang 54(4):439–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pesonen M, Kurttila M, Kangas J, Kajanus M, Heinonen P (2001) Assessing the priorities using A’WOT among resource management strategies at the finnish forest and park service. For Sci 47(4):534–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch P (2007) SWOT analyses and SWOT strategy formulation for forest owner cooperations in Austria. Eur J For Res 126(3):413–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0162-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, setting priorities, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill International Book Co., New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty RW (1987) The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Math Model 9(3–5):161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2001) Models, methods, concepts and applications of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SFFI (Sustaining Family Forests Initiative) (2020) Tools for Engaging Landowners Effectively (TELE) Method. https://www.engaginglandowners.org/landowner-data/landowner-segments Accessed 11 July 2020

  • Sharma M, Bhatia G (1996) The voluntary community health movement in India: a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis. J Community Health 21(6):453–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha RK, Alavalapati JRR, Kalmbacher RS (2004) Exploring the potential for Silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method. AgricSyst 81(3):185–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver E (2014) Private woodland owner timber harvesting behavior. Available online at http://dataverse.acg.maine.edu/dvn/dv/place_silver. accessed 15 July 2020

  • Smith JB, Nielsen CK, Hellgren EC (2015) Suitable habitat for recolonizing large carnivores in the midwestern United States. ORYX. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605314001227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song N, Aguilar FX, Butler BJ (2014) Cost-share program participation and family forest owners’ past and intended future management practices. For Policy 46:39–46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stainback GA, Masozera M, Mukuralinda A, Dwivedi P (2012) Smallholder agroforestry in Rwanda: a SWOT-AHP analysis. Small-Scale For 11(3):285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straka TJ (2011) Taxonomic review of classical and current literature on the Perennial American family forest problem. Forests 2011(2):660–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer J, Thomas W, Ammerman B, Niman C, Agyeman DA, Dhungel G, Ochuodho TO (2020) Kentucky Forest Sector: Economic Contribution Report 2018–2019. FORFS 20-02. Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Kentucky. Lexington, KY.

  • Urquhart J, Courtney P (2011) Seeing the owner behind the trees: a typology of small-scale private woodland owners in England. Fort Policy and Econ 13(7):535–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, Sun Apr 07 16:03:50 GMT 2019. Forest Inventory EVALIDator web-application Version 1.8.0.00. St. Paul, MN: the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. [Available only on internet: http://apps.fs.usda.gov/Evalidator/evalidator.jsp]

  • Weihrich H (1982) The TOWS matrix: a tool for situational analysis. Long Range Plan 15(2):54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelen TL, Hunger JD (1995) Strategic management and business policy, 5th edn. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

    William R. Thomas, Thomas O. Ochuodho, Chad F. Niman, Matthew T. Springer, Domena A. Agyeman & Laura R. Lhotka

Authors
  1. William R. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas O. Ochuodho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chad F. Niman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthew T. Springer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Domena A. Agyeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Laura R. Lhotka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas O. Ochuodho.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, W.R., Ochuodho, T.O., Niman, C.F. et al. Stakeholder Perceptions of White Oak Supply in Kentucky: A SWOT-AHP Analysis. Small-scale Forestry 20, 279–304 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09468-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09468-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation