Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Small-Scale Forest Cooperative Management of the Grain for Green Program in Xinjiang, China: A SWOT-ANP Analysis

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Grain for green program (GFGP) has resulted in a large number of small-scale, scattered family forest land operators in China. Small-scale forest cooperative management helps to bring together fragmented reforested land, optimizes the operation level of small-scale forests, and improves the effectiveness and sustainability of the GFGP. We use the Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis network process framework to identify key elements and main strategies associated with small-scale forest cooperative management under the GFGP in Xinjiang, China. Our 5 major findings are: (1) the positive factors associated with small-scale forest cooperative management under the GFGP in Xinjiang are more important than the negative factors, (2) the team of administrators suggests focusing on the structure of rural governance, the development of new types of agri-business, and the reform of collective forest property rights, (3) The team of researchers suggests focusing on the expectation of cooperation from participating farmers, the priorities and core workings of the GFGP, the relevant laws that seem to be out of touch with the demands of farmers, and the second plow risk after compensation, (4) the strategy of small-scale forest cooperative management under the GFGP in Xinjiang should comprehensively integrate the strategies of the teams of administrators and researchers in order to ensure its suitability and operability, and (5) the team of administrators chose the weakness-opportunity strategy, whereas the team of researchers suggested focusing on the strength-threat strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Closed forest land refers to the natural forest and man-made forest with tree canopy density greater than or equal to 20%.

  2. According to the World Bank (2020), the forest area in China grew from 1.8 million square km in 1999 to 2.1 million square km in 2013. A report by the FAO indicates, the SLCP or GFGP program increased forest areas by 18% (FAO 2020). The SLCP also had unintended consequences as it caused slippage, thereby converting nearly 1/5 of agriculturally productive land to forest land (Yan 2019).

  3. Specialized Farmers’ Cooperatives are economic organizations consisting of producers and operators of the same kind of products or the providers and users of the same kind of agricultural production and operation services. Specialized Farmers’ Cooperatives provide services such as production material sales, technical consultation, market information release, and product processing and sales. Specialized Farmers’ Cooperatives have developed rapidly since its establishment in the country in 2007. These cooperatives have become the dominant agricultural cooperative management organizations.

  4. New types of agricultural businesses are the new organizational units closely related to modern agricultural development and agricultural management system innovation. The new types of agricultural businesses (Specialized Farmers’ Cooperatives, Family Farms, Large Family Farming Businesses, and Leading Agriculture Enterprises) meet the needs of agricultural modernization development and guide small-scale farmers onto the track of modern agriculture.

  5. In the past 40 years, the Chinese government has launched a series of afforestation projects, such as the Grain for Green Program, the Natural Forest Protection Project, and the Three-north Shelterbelt Project, which initially constructed the shield system of ecological security in China. The shield system of ecological security has significantly improved the quality and stability of the ecosystem.

  6. The Collective forest property rights (CFPR) reform entails clarification of proprietary rights, survey and certification, lifting restrictions of management rights, and fulfillment of disposition rights. The Collective forest property rights have been implemented to accelerate China’s rural restructuring. It is regarded as the third land reform. In 2003, Fujian and Jiangxi provinces launched a trial reform of the CFPR. There are 2 mandates related to the CFPR: Guidance on Comprehensively Launching the Reform of Collective Forest Property Rights (2008) and Guidance on Improving the System of Collective Forest Rights (2016). The CFPR reform mainly concentrates on the cultivation of the new types of agricultural businesses and the achievement of moderate-scale operations of collective forest in recent years.

References

  • Catron JF, Stainback GA, Dwivedi P, Lhotka JM (2013) Bioenergy development in Kentucky: A SWOT-ANP analysis. For Policy Econ 28:38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary E, Barnes TS, Xu Y, Zhao H, Clements ACA, Gray DJ, Mcmanus DP, Atkinson J, Williams GM, Yang YR (2014) Impact of “Grain to Green” Programme on echinococcosis infection in Ningxia Hui autonomous region of China. Vet Parasitol 205:523–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding W, Wu Y (1998) The development thought of agricultural mountainous area after Grain for Green Project. Mt Area Develop 11:4–5 (published in a Chinese language journal)

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2020) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020 Report China. http://www.fao.org/3/ca9980en/ca9980en.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

  • Groselj P, Stirn LZ (2015) The environmental management problem of Pohorje, Slovenia: a new group approach within ANP - SWOT framework. J Environ Manag 161:106–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Zhou H, Wang J, Wang Y (2010) Driving forces of returning cultivated land to forest and grass in China at different scales. J Arid Land Resour Environ 24:112–116

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kong X, Shi B (2009) Operating mechanism, fundamental function of current farmer professional cooperative organizations and factors affecting them. Rural Econom 1:3–9 (published in a Chinese language journal)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lallo GD, Maesano M, Masiero M, Mugnozza GS, Marchetti M (2016) Analyzing strategies to enhance small and low intensity managed forests certification in Europe using SWOT-ANP. Small-scale For 15(3):393–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Y, Liu M, Wen Y (2013) Farmers’ demand for forestry cooperative organization: a case study of Sanming city, Fujian province. J Beijing For Univ (Soc Sci) 12:55–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2004) Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). J Syst Sci Syst Eng 13:1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SFA, 2014. A new round of Sloping Land Conversion Program restarts, another major breakthrough in China’s deepening overall reform, China Green Times.

  • Shahabi RS, Basiri MH, Kahag MR, Zonouzi SA (2014) An ANP–SWOT approach for interdependency analysis and prioritizing the Iran׳ s steel scrap industry strategies. Resour Policy 42:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi C, Yao S (2016) The priority areas selection study of the new round sloping land conversion program: a literature review. For Econ 38:66–69

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2020) Forest area. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.FRST.K2?locations=CN&view=chart. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

  • Xie C, Zhang K, Peng W, Wang J, Liu J, Jiang X, Li B (2015) Policy trends and demand during the alternating phase of conversion of Cropland to Forests Program-The main results of 2014 social economic M&E of conversion of cropland to forest program. For Econ 37:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Ping Y, Wang P (2015) Strategic choice of recreational fishery development in Zhejiang province based on SWOT-AHP method. Chin Agric Sci Bull 31:38–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Y (2019) Unintended land use effects of afforestation in China’s Grain for Green Program. Am J Agric Econom 101(4):1047–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuksel I, Dagdeviren M (2007) Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis-a case study for a textile firm. Inf Sci 177:3364–3382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhi L (2010) Current situation and prospect of forestry cooperative economic organization. World For Res 23:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Paudel KP (2019) Policy improvements and farmers’ willingness to participate: Insights from the new round of China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program. Ecol Econ 162:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Q (2015) The embedding of the cooperative organization and rural social governance structure transformation. J Soc Sci 3:59–71 (published in a Chinese language journal)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishna P. Paudel.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic supplementary material 1 (DOCX 49 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Paudel, K.P. Small-Scale Forest Cooperative Management of the Grain for Green Program in Xinjiang, China: A SWOT-ANP Analysis. Small-scale Forestry 20, 221–233 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09465-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09465-2

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation