Abstract
The restitution and privatization in Central and Eastern European countries in the early 1990s predisposed a heterogeneous ownership structure, a large number of forest owners and a variety of types of property ownership modes. Furthermore, development of governance in these countries posited a new framework for interest representation in the forestry sector, mainly through organised forms of private forest owners, i.e. formation of forest owners’ associations (FOAs). In this region, FOAs were one of the opportunities for interest representation in the land restitution processes. Later on these associations gained more competency and importance not only in influencing forest policy-making, but also in offering services to their members. The aim of the paper is to improve the understanding of the origins, evolution and current situation of FOAs in Central and Eastern Europe by describing the factors that influenced the FOAs’ creation and development. On the basis of their similar history seven Central Eastern European countries were selected for FOAs analysis: Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and Slovakia. The main findings of the study include that FOAs in Eastern and Central Europe, though being the result of the same socio-political changes, differ between countries in terms of their organisational forms. However, they face similar challenges, including the limited motivation of owners to join associations. Also, they undertake similar activities for their successful development, including the provision of information services for their members. Despite not having any legal competence for the direct management of their member’s forests, these FAOs do have strong representative and demonstrative effects in their countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs) is an OECD term for the group of countries comprising Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, and the three Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.(http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=303).
NATURA 2000 is an ecological network of protected areas in the territory of European Union designed by each EU Member State according to the Habitats Directive (Council Directive 92/43/EEC) and the Birds Directive (Council Directive 2009/147/EC).
References
Bouriaud L (2006) Ownership and property rights: factors relevant for innovation and enterprise development in small-scale forestry. In: Niskanen A (ed) Issues affecting enterprise development in the forest sector in Europe, Research notes 169, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu
Butler BJ (2005) The new face of forest owners in the United States. In: Small scale forestry in a changing environment, International symposium, May 30–June 4, 2005, Vilnius
Butler B, Tyrrell M, Chwla P, Singh R (2010) TELE: Tools for engaging landowners effectively. In: Medved M (ed) Small scale forestry in a changing world: opportunities and challenges and the role of extension and technology transfer, Proceedings of the conference, 6–12 June 2010, Bled, Slovenia [CD-ROM] Slovenian Forestry Institute: Slovenian Forest Service, Ljubljana
FAO (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010. Main report. FAO forestry paper 163. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1757e/i1757e.pdf Accessed 21 Nov 2013
FAO (2012a) Review of forest owners’ organizations in selected Eastern European countries, by G. Weiss, I. Gudurić, B. Wolfslehner. Forestry policy and institutions working paper no. 30. Rome http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/me171e/me171e00.pdf Accessed 20 Feb 2013
FAO (2012b) Success cases and good practices of forest owners’ organizations in Eastern European countries by G Weiss, M Dragoi, V Jarský, D Mizaraite, Z Sarvašová, E Schiberna, I Gudurić. Rome http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/ap469e/ap469e00.pdf Accessed 20 Feb 2013
Gibson R, Hassan S, Holtz S, Tansey J, Whitelaw G (2005) Sustainability Assessment Criteria. Processes and Applications, Earthscan
Glück P (1976) Die Rolle der Verbände in der theoretischen Forst- und Holzwirtschaftspolitik, Wien
Glück P, Avdibegović M, Čabaravdić A, Nonić D, Petrovic N, Posavec S, Stojanovska M (2010) The preconditions for the formation of private forest owners’ interest associations in the western Balkan region. For Policy Econ 12(4):250–263
Glück P, Avdibegović M, Čabaravdić A, Nonić D, Petrovic N, Posavec S, Stojanovska M (2011) Private forest owners in the western Balkans—ready for the formation of interest associations. EFI Research report no. 25. Joensuu
Golos P, Geszprych M (2005) Small-scale forestry in Poland—results of the project on the forest accountancy data network. In: Small scale forestry in a changing environment: International symposium, May 30—June 4, 2005, Vilnius, Lithuania
Gootee RS, Blatner KA, Baumgartner DM, Carroll MS (2010) Private forests and equitable regulation. In: Medved M (ed) Small scale forestry in a changing world: Opportunities and challenges and the role of extension and technology transfer: Proceedings of the conference, 6–12 June 2010, Bled, Slovenia [CD-ROM]. Ljubljana, Slovenian Forestry Institute: Slovenian Forest Service, Ljubljana
Graf P (2006) Staat und organisierte Interessen in der Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft: Pluralismus, Neokorporatismus und Policy-Netzwerke, In: Barrios, Stefes (eds) Einführung in die Comparative Politics, Munchen/Wien, 136–153
Hogl K, Pregernig M, Weiss G (2005) What is new about new forest owners? A typology of private forest owners in Austria. Small-scale For 4(3):325–342
Ioras F, Abrudan I (2006) The Romanian forestry sector: privatisation facts. Int For Rev 8(3):361–367
Karppinen H (2000) Forest values and the objectives of forest ownership. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research papers 757, Vantaa, Finland
Kittredge DB (2005) The cooperation of private forest owners on scales larger than one individual property: international examples and potential application in the United States. For Policy Econ 7(5):671–688
Kurttila M (2005) Family forest owners’ knowledge with respect obligations and recommendations fostering biodiversity in forest management. In: Small scale forestry in a changing environment: International symposium, May 30–June 4, 2005, Vilnius, Lithuania
Lidestav G, Holgren E, Keskitalo C (2010) The Swedish forest commons in a rural development context. In: Medved M (ed) Small scale forestry in a changing world: Opportunities and challenges and the role of extension and technology transfer: Proceedings of the conference, 6–12 June 2010, Bled, Slovenia (CD-ROM). Slovenian Forestry Institute: Slovenian Forest Service, Ljubljana
Matta JR, Alavalapati JRR (2006) Perceptions of collective action and its success in community based natural resource management: an empirical analysis. For Policy Econ 9(3):274–284
McKean MA (1998) Common property: what is it, what is it good for, and what makes it work? In: Gibson C, McKean M, Ostrom E (eds) Forest resources and institutions. Forests, trees and people programme, Working Paper 3. FAO, Rome
Medved M (2005) Statistical research of forest management of private family forests in Slovenia. In: Small scale forestry in a changing environment: International symposium, May 30–June 4, 2005, Vilnius, Lithuania
Medved M, Matijašič M, Rok P (2010) Private property conditions of Slovenian forests in 2010. Preliminary results. In: Medved M (ed) Small scale forestry in a changing world: Opportunities and challenges and the role of extension and technology transfer: Proceedings of the conference, 6–12 June 2010, Bled, Slovenia [CD-ROM] Slovenian Forestry Institute: Slovenian Forest Service, Ljubljana
Mendes CA, Størdal S, Adamczyk W, Bancu D, Bouriaud L, Feliciano D, Gallagher R, Kajanus M, Mészáros K, Schraml U, Venzi L (2006) Forest owners’ organizations across Europe: similarities and differences. In: Niskanen A (ed) Issues affecting enterprise development in the forest sector in Europe. University of Joensuu, Joensuu, Finland, Faculty of Forestry
Mendes CA, Stefanek B, Feliciano D, Mizaraite D, Nonic D, Kitchoukov E, Nybakk E, Duduman G, Weiss G, Nichiforel L, Stoyanova M, Mäkinen P, Alves R, Milijic V, Sarvasova Z (2011) Institutional innovation in European private forestry: the emergence of forest owners’ organizations. In: Weiss G, Pettenella D, Ollonqvist P, Slee B (eds) Innovation in forestry: territorial and value chain relationships. CAB International, Wallingford
Mizaraite D, Mizaras S (2005a) Empirically based grouping of private forest owners in Lithuania. Balt For 11(1):80–87
Mizaraite D, Mizaras S (2005b) The formation of small-scale forestry in countries with economies in transition: observations from Lithuania. Small-scale For 4(4):437–450
Nichiforel L, Schanz H (2009) Property rights distribution and entrepreneurial rent-seeking in Romanian forestry: a perspective of private forest. Eur J For Res. doi:10.1007/s10342-009-0337-8
Nonic D, Bliss JC, Milijic V, Petrovic N, Avdibegovic M, Mataruga M (2011) Challenges of organizing private forest owners in Serbia. Small-scale For 10(4):435–455
Olson M (1971) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups (Revised edition ed.). Harvard University Press, Boston
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York
Ostrom E (1999) Self governance and forest resources. Occasional paper no. 20, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia
Pivoriūnas A, Lazdinis M (2004) Needs of private forest owners in the context of changing political system: Lithuania as a case study. Small-scale For 3(2):191–202
Põllumäe P, Korjus H, Kaimre P, Vahter T (2014) Motives and incentives for joining forest owner associations in Estonia. Small-scale For 13(1):19–33
Rametsteiner E, Weiss G, Kubeczko K (2005) Innovation and entrepreneurship in forestry in central Europe. Brill, Leiden
Rauch P (2007) SWOT analyses and SWOT strategy formulation for forest owner cooperations in Austria. Eur J For Res 126(3):413–420
Salisbury RH (1969) An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest J Political Sci 13(1):1–32
Salisbury RH (1975) Interest Groups. In: Greenstein F, Polsby N (eds) Handbook of Political Science, Nongovernmental Politics, vol 4. Addison-Wesley Longman, New York, pp 171–228
Schmithüsen F (2007) Multifunctional forestry practices as a land use strategy to meet increasing private and public demands in modern societies. J For Sci 53(6):290–298
Schmithüsen F, Hirsch F (2010) Private forest ownership in Europe. UNECE/FAO, Rome
Schraml U (2005) Between legitimacy and efficiency: the development of forestry associations in Germany. Small-scale For 4(3):251–268
Schraml U, Memmler M (2005) The farmer never dies—classification of private forest owners. In: Small scale forestry in a changing environment: International symposium, May 30–June 4, 2005, Vilnius
Seebaldt M (1997) Organisierter Pluralismus, Kräftefeld, Selbstverständnis und politische Arbeit deutscher Interessengruppen. Opladen
Seeland K, Godat J, Hansmann R (2011) Regional forest organizations and their innovation impact on forestry and regional development in central Switzerland. For Policy Econ 13(5):353–360
Slee B (2005) The scope for reconciling public good and private forestry in the UK. In: Small scale forestry in a changing environment: International symposium, May 30–June 4, 2005, Vilnius
Valkeapää A, Karppinen H (2010) Legitimacy of forest policy in Finland—forest owners’ and other citizens’ perspectives. In: Medved M (ed) Small Scale Forestry in a Changing World: Opportunities and challenges and the role of extension and technology transfer: Proceedings of the conference, 6–12 June 2010, Bled, Slovenia [CD-ROM] Slovenian Forestry Institute: Slovenian Forest Service, Ljubljana
Weiss G, Tykkä S, Nichiforel L, Dobšinská Z, Sarvašová Z, Mizaraite D, Nedelkovic J (2011) Innovation and sustainability in forestry in Central and Eastern Europe: challenges and perspectives (SUSI-CEE). Final report. Draft June 2011. Unpublished. European Forest Institute, Joensu, Finland
Acknowledgments
This research was made possible through a collaboration of researchers within the network of the Central-East European Regional Office of the European Forest Institute (EFICEEC) and within the two research projects “Innovation and Sustainability of forestry in Central-Eastern Europe: Challenges and Perspectives” (funded by the Austrian Ministry of Science and Research) and “Review of forest owners’ organizations in selected Eastern European countries”(funded by the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the UN). Further support was given by the Austrian Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management and by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-0057-11, Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports—Grant No. COST CZ LD 14083 and by the home institutions of the researchers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sarvašová, Z., Zivojinovic, I., Weiss, G. et al. Forest Owners Associations in the Central and Eastern European Region. Small-scale Forestry 14, 217–232 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-014-9283-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-014-9283-5