Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Tree Diversity on Soil Organic Carbon Content in the Homegarden Agroforestry System of North-Eastern Bangladesh

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tropical agroforestry systems have immense potential to sequester carbon both in aboveground and belowground biomass and soil. Homegarden agroforestry is a popular land-use system in the tropics, sequestrating more organic carbon in soil than crops, monoculture plantations and even than other agroforestry systems. Tree diversity and density are reported to affect soil organic carbon content in many of tropical agroforestry systems. Little evidence, however, exists for tropical homegardens. The present study has been conducted to investigate soil organic carbon content in relation to tree species diversity in the homegarden agroforestry system of north-eastern Bangladesh, to test the hypothesis that homegardens with high species diversity contain more organic carbon in soil than those with low species diversity. A multistage random sample of homegardens was selected and observations made in sample plots of tree density, species richness, soil pH and soil organic carbon content. Soil samples were collected at two depths (0–25, 26–50 cm) from each plot. Soil organic carbon content was found to be positively correlated with both tree density (r = 0.93, p < 0.01) and species richness (r = 0.79, p < 0.01). Soil pH was not found to differ significantly across soil depth (p = 0.67), except that more organic carbon content was found in the deeper soil layer than the upper layer (p < 0.05). The study demonstrates that species-rich homegarden with high tree density can sequester more carbon in soil than species-poor homegardens and thereby contribute more to climate change mitigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A blank experiment is a control treatment without any soil sample and used as a reference point.

References

  • Akhter S, Alamgir M, Sohel MSI, Rana MP, Ahmed SJM, Chowdhury MSH (2010) The role of women in traditional farming systems as practiced in homegardens: a case study in Sylhet Sadar Upazila, Bangladesh. Trop Conserv Sci 3(1):17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht A, Kandji ST (2003) Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 99(1):15–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BARC (Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council) (2005) Soil fertility status of different agro-ecological zones. BARC Soils Publication No. 45: 15–32

  • Batjes NH (1996) Total C and N in soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci 47(2):151–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beer J, Bonnemann A, Chavez W, Fassbender HW, Imbach AC, Martel I (1990) Modelling agroforestry systems of cacao (Theobroma cacao) with laurel (Cordia alliadora) or poro (Erythrina poeppigiana) in Costa Rica. V. Productivity indices, organic material models and sustainability over ten years. Agrofor Syst 12(3):229–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Foresta H, Michon G (1994) Agroforests in Sumatra: where ecology meets economy. Agrofor Today 6:12–13

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2003) State of Forest genetic resources conservation and management in Bangladesh. Working Paper No. FGR/68E. Rome, Italy

  • Fernandes ECM, Nair PKR (1986) An evaluation of the structure and function of tropical homegardens. Agric Syst 21(4):279–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Núñez E, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, Mosquera-Losada MR (2010) C allocation dynamics one decade after afforestation with Pinus radiataD. Don and Betula alba L. under two stand densities in NW Spain. Ecol Eng 36(7):876–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher SR (2005) Global Climate Change: the Kyoto Protocol. CRS Report for Congress

  • Gama-Rodrigues EF, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Gama-Rodrigues AC, Baligar VC, Machado RCR (2010) Carbon storage in soil size fractions under two cacao agroforestry systems in Bahia, Brazil. Environ Manag 45(2):274–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett DS, Mosquera-Losada MR, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (2011) Soil C storage in silvopastoral systems and a treeless pasture in northwestern Spain. J Environ Qual 40(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate Change 2007: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html. Accessed on 12 Dec 2013

  • Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and envi-ronmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby KR, Potvin C (2007) Variation in carbon storage among tree species: implications for the management of a small scale carbon sink project. For Ecol Manag 246(2):208–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM, George SJ, Suresh TK (2001) Fodder grass productivity and soil fertility changes under four grass + tree associations in Kerala. India Agrofor Syst 52(1):91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Poidy N, Schroth G, Zech W (1998) Short-term effects of soil amendment with three legume biomass on carbon and nitrogen in particle size separates in central Togo. Soil Biol Biochem 30(12):1545–1552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maia SMF, Xavier FAS, Oliveira TS, Mendonça ES, Araújo-Filho JA (2007) Organic carbon pools in a Luvisol under agroforestry and conventional farming systems in the semi-arid region of Ceará. Brazil. Agroforest Syst 71(2):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makumba W, Akinnifesi FK, Janssen B, Oenema O (2007) Long-term impact of a gliricidia-maize intercropping system on carbon sequestration in southern Malawi. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118(3):237–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makundi WR, Sathaye JA (2004) GHG mitigation potential and cost in tropical forestry—relative role for agroforestry. Environ Dev Sustain 6(1–2):235–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhi Y, Roberts JT, Betts RA, Killeen TJ, Li W, Nobre CA (2008) Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 319(5860):169–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margalef R (1958) Information theory in ecology. Gen Syst 3:36–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Matos ES, Freese D, Mendonca ES, Slazak A, Huttl RF (2010a) C, nitrogen and organic C fractions in topsoil affected by conversion from silvopastoral to different land use systems. Agroforest Syst 81(3):203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matos ES, Freese D, Ślązak A, Bachmann U, Veste M, Hüttl RF (2010b) Organic-C and nitrogen stocks and organic-C fractions in soil under mixed pine and oak forest stands of different ages in NE Germany. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 173(5):654–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mc Connell DJ (1992) The Forest Garden Farms of Kandy, Sri Lanka. FAO Farm Systems Management, Series 3, FAO, Rome

  • Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an under-exploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agroforest Syst 61(1–3):281–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosquera-Losada MR, Cuiña-Cotarelo R, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (2011) Effect of understory vegetation management through liming and sewage sludge fertilization on soil fertility and Pinus radiate D. Don growth after reforestation. Eur J For Res 130(6):997–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR (1993) An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 499 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR and Nair VD (2003) Carbon storage in North American agroforestry systems, In Kimble J, Heath LS, Birdsey RA, Lal R (eds.): The Potential of U.S. Forest Soils to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 333–346

  • Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009a) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172(1):10–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM and Haile SG (2009b) Soil carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems: a feasibility appraisal. Elsevier, pp. 1102-1104

  • Oelbermann M, Voroney RP (2007) Carbon and nitrogen in a temperate agroforestry system: using stable isotopes as a tool to understand soil dynamics. Ecol Eng 29(3):342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palm CA, Tomich T, van Noordwijk M, Vosti S, Alegre J, Gockowski J, Verchot L (2004) Mitigating GHG emissions in the humid tropics: case studies from the Alternatives to Slash-and-Burn Program (ASB). Environ. Dev. Sust. 6(1–2):145–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman M, Rahman MM, Islam M (2009) Financial viability and conservation role of betel leaf based agroforestry: an indigenous hill farming system of Khasia Community in Bangladesh. J For Res 20(2):131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman M, Islam J, Islam M, Alam M, Rana P (2010) Species composition and indigenous management of home garden of Manipuri community in Sylhet, Bangladesh. Int J For Usufructs Manag 11(1):37–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao MR, Nair PKK, Ong CK (1998) Biophysical interactions in tropical agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 38(1–3):3–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshetko M, Delaney M, Hairiah K, Purnomosidhi P (2002) Carbon stocks in Indonesian homegarden systems: can small-holder systems be targeted for increased carbon storage? Am J Altern Agric 17(3):125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha HK, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM (2009) Soil carbon stock in relation to plant diversity of homegardens in Kerala, India. Agrofor Syst 76(1):53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez PA (2000) Linking climate change research with food security and poverty reduction in the tropics. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82(1–3):371–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobuj NA, Rahman M (2011a) Assessment of plant diversity in the Khadimnagar National Park of Bangladesh. Inter J Environ Sci 2(1):79–91

  • Sobuj NA, Rahman M (2011b) Comparison of Plant Diversity of Natural Forest and Plantations of Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary of Bangladesh. J For Sci 27(3):127–134

  • Swift MJ, Anderson JM (1993) Biodiversity and ecosystem function in agricultural systems. In: Schulze ED, Mooney HA (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Springer, Berlin, pp 15–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Szott LT, Fernandes ECM, Sanchez PA (1991) Soil–plant interactions in agroforestry systems. In: Jarvis PG (ed) Agroforestry: principles and practices. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 127–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Tans P (2010) Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide—Mauna Loa. NOAA/ESRL. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/. Accessed 6 Oct 2010

  • Young A (1997) Agroforestry for soil management, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely acknowledge the co-operation of the homegardeners (the farmers) who wholeheartedly assisted during the field work of the study. We thank The Soil Resource Development Institution (SRDI), Sylhet, Bangladesh for providing the laboratory facilities for soil analysis. We also thank Steve Harrison (SSFO editor) and two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions to improve earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mizanur Rahman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Islam, M., Dey, A. & Rahman, M. Effect of Tree Diversity on Soil Organic Carbon Content in the Homegarden Agroforestry System of North-Eastern Bangladesh. Small-scale Forestry 14, 91–101 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-014-9275-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-014-9275-5

Keywords

Navigation