Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Carbon Storage on Non-industrial Private Forestland: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leading scientific experts in the field of climate change suggest that a multifaceted response to global warming should include the use of forest carbon offsets (also known as forest sinks). Emerging emissions reduction legislation in the United States (US) accounts for this recommendation by allowing for carbon offsets derived from domestic forestry projects (e.g. reforestation, afforestation, avoided deforestation). Given that the majority of US forestland is privately owned and non-industrial, the current research employs a behavioral model to measure intentions of private non-industrial forestland owners to participate in carbon sequestration and trading. Results suggest that very few (5.1 %) of these forestland owners are currently involved in carbon sequestration and trading, but half (50.4 %) were at least somewhat interested in exploring opportunities to do so. The Theory of Planned Behavior, acting as the theoretical frame of reference, was extended in the current research to include environmental orientation, innovativeness, perceived risk and tested knowledge, all of which had significant effects on core model constructs: attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control and behavioral intentions. The extended model explained a significant amount of the variance related to behavioral intentions to sequester carbon on private US forestland (R2 = .53).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alig RJ (2003) US landowner behavior, land use and land cover changes, and climate change mitigation. Silva Fennica 37(4):511–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Amacher GS, Koskela E, Ollikainen M (2002) Forest rotation and interdependent stands: ownership structure and timing of decisions. University of Helsinki Discussion Paper Series

  • Amacher GS, Conway MC, Sullivan J (2003) Econometric analyses of nonindustrial forest landowners: is there anything left to study? J For Econ 9:137–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barr S (2007) Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: a U.K. case study of household waste management. Environ Behav 39(4):435–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch TW (1996) The private forest-land owners of the United States, 1994. USDA Forest Service. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Res. Bull. NE-134. Radnor, PA, 183 p

  • Birdsey R, Alig R, Adams D (2000) Mitigation options in the forest sector to reduce emissions or enhance sinks of greenhouse gases. In: Joyce LA, Birdsey R (eds) The impact of climate change on America’s forests. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-59. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Portland

  • Blennow K, Sallnas O (2002) Risk perception among non-industrial private forest owners. Scand J For Resour 17:472–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonan GB (2008) Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320:1444–1449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bull L, Thompson DW (2011) Developing forest sinks in Australia and the United States: a forest owner’s prerogative. For Policy Econ 13(5):311–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler BJ (2008) Family forest owners of the United States, 2006. General technical report NRS-27. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA

  • Butler BJ, Leatherberry EC (2004) America’s family forest owners. J For 102(7):4–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary JW, Wilkinson RL (2008) Perceived profitability and farmers’ conservation behaviour. J Agric Econ 48(1–3):13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • CCAR (2009) Forest project protocol: version 2.1. http://www.climateregistry.org/resources/docs/protocols/project/forest/Forest_Project_Protocol_Version_2.1_Sept2007.pdf. Accessed 02 Apr 2009

  • CCX (2009) Chicago climate exchange. http://www.chicagoclimatex.com. Accessed 09 Apr 2009

  • Conway C, Amacher GS, Sullivan J (2002) Decisions forest landowners make. Virginia Tech Deparment of Forestry, Blacksburg VA, USA

  • Costanza R, Farber SC, Maxwell J (1989) The valuation and management of wetland ecosystems. Ecol Econ 1:335–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo AH, del Bosque IR (2008) The effect of innovativeness on the adoption of B2C e-commerce: a model based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Comput Hum Behav 24:2830–2847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings RG, Elliott S, Harrison GW, Murphy J (1997) Are hypothetical referenda incentive compatible? J Polit Econ 105:609–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande R, Farley JU, Webster FE Jr (1993) Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis. J Mark 57(1):23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA (2007) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling GR, Staelin R (1994) A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. J Consum Res 21(June):119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Jones RE (2000) Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J Soc Issues 56(3):425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher LS, Kittredge D Jr, Stevens T (2009) Forest landowners’ willingness to sell carbon credits: a pilot study. North J Appl For 26(1):35–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis JJ, Eccles MP, Johnston M, Walker A, Grimshaw J, Foy R, Kaner EFS, Smith, L, Bonetti D (2004) Constructing questionnaires based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle, UK. ISBN: 0-9540161-5-7

  • Hardner JJ, Frumhoff PC, Goetze D (2000) Prospects for mitigating carbon, conserving biodiversity, and promoting socioeconomic development objectives through the clean development mechanism. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 5:61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harland P, Staats H, Wilke HAM (1999) Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 29(12):2505–2528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines J, Hungerford H, Tomera A (1987) Analysis and sysnthesis of research on environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. J Environ Educ 18:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang E, Chuang MH (2007) Extending the theory of planned behaviour as a model to explain post-merger employee behaviour of IS use. Comput Hum Behav 23:240–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley RF, Hult TM (1998) Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. J Mark 62(7):42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) Geneva, Switzerland

  • Jacobson M (2002a) Ecosystem management in the United States: interest of forest landowners in joint management across ownerships. Small Scale For Econ Manag Policy 1(1):71–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson M (2002b) Factors affecting private forest landowner interest in ecosystem management: linking spatial and survey data. Environ Manage 30(4):577–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jerez-Gomez P, Ce’spedes-Lorente J, Valle-Cabrera R (2005) Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement. J Bus Res 58(6):715–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karppinen H (2005) Forest owners’ choice of reforestation method: an application of the theory of planned behavior. For Policy Econ 7:393–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilgore MA, Snyder SA, Schertz J, Taff SJ (2008) What does it take to get family forest owners to enroll in a forest stewardship-type program? For Policy Econ 10:507–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman WEK, Greener JM, Simpson DD (2002) Assessing organizational readiness for change. J Subst Abuse Treat 22(4):197–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lobb AE, Mazzocchi M, Traill WB (2007) Modelling risk perception and trust in food safety information within the theory of planned behaviour. Food Qual Prefer 18:384–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan V, Muller E, Bass FM (1990) New product diffusion models in marketing: a review and directions for research. J Mark 54(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowski-Lindsay M, Stevens T, Kittredge DB, Butler BJ, Catanzaro P (2011) Barriers to Massachusetts forest landowner participation in carbon markets. Ecol Econ 71:180–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane BL, Boxall PC (2000) Factors influencing forest values and attitudes of two stakeholder groups: the case of the Foothills Model Forest, Alberta, Canada. Soc Nat Resour 13:649–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnelly JC (1970) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Olander LP, Boyd W, Lawlor K, Madeira EM, Niles JO (2009) International forest carbon and the climate change challenge: issues and options. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University. NI R 09-04

  • OpenCongress (2010) H.R.2454—American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h2454/show. Accessed 07 May 2010

  • Oreskes N (2004) The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 306:1686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanayak S, Murray B, Abt R (2002) How joint is joint forest production: an econometric analysis of timber supply conditional on endogenous amenity values? For Sci 48(3):479–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen J (1987) Man and the forest: four basic attitudes. Silva Fennica 21(4):323–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouta E, Rekola M (2001) The Theory of Planned Behavior in predicting willingness to pay for abatement of forest regeneration. Soc Nat Resour 14:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RGGI (2009) RGGI fact sheet. http://www.rggi.org/docs/RGGI_Executive%20Summary_4.22.09.pdf. Accessed 04 Apr 2009

  • Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM, Shoemaker FF (1971) Communication of innovations. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer JP (1985) The effects of markets and public policies on the reforestation behavior of southern landowners. Southeastern Center for Forest Economics Research WP 12, Research Triangle Park, NC

  • Schmiege SJ, Bryan A, Klein WMP (2009) Distinction between worry and perceived risk in the context of the Theory of Planned Behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 39(1):95–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straka TJ, Doolittle S (1988) Propensity of nonindustrial private forest landowners to regenerate following harvest: relationship to socioeconomic characteristics, including innovativeness. Resour Manag Optim 6(2):121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrant MA, Cordell HK (2002) Amenity values of public and private forests: examining the value-attitude relationship. Environ Manage 30(5):682–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SC, Barton MA (1994) Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. J Environ Psychol 14:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uliczka H, Angelstam P, Jansson G, Bro A (2004) Non-industrial private forest owners’ knowledge of and attitudes towards nature conservation. Scand J For Res 19:274–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2007) Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2005. US Environmental Protection Agency 430-R-07-002. Washington, DC

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2001) U.S. forest facts and historical trends. USDA Forest Service-FS-696-M

  • Vaske JJ, Donnelly MP (2000) A value-attitude-behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Soc Nat Resour 12:523–537

    Google Scholar 

  • VCS (2008) Voluntary carbon standard: tool for AFOLU methodological issues. http://www.v-c-s.org. Accessed 08 Apr 2009

  • Wade D, Moseley C (2011) Foresters’ perceptions of family forest owner willingness to participate in forest carbon markets. North J Appl For 28(4):199–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang CL, Ahmed PK (2004) The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. Eur J Innov Manag 7(4):303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCI (2008) Design recommendations for the WCI regional cap-and-trade program. http://www.westernclimateinitiative.org/ewebeditpro/items/O104F21252.pdf. Accessed 01 Apr 2009

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the USDA National Institute for Food and Agriculture for funding this research project through a grant to the Institute for Culture and Ecology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oregon State University, 119 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA

    Derek W. Thompson

  2. Oregon State University, 108 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331-5751, USA

    Eric N. Hansen

Authors
  1. Derek W. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric N. Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek W. Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, D.W., Hansen, E.N. Carbon Storage on Non-industrial Private Forestland: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Small-scale Forestry 12, 631–657 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-013-9235-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-013-9235-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation