Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Advantages of Small-Scale Forestry Among Emerging Forest Tenures

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forestland tenure institutions and patterns are in a period of rapid change in the USA. Historically dominant forestland tenures are disappearing, and new tenures are emerging. Traditional, vertically integrated forest products firms have shed their forestland holdings which have been picked up by Timber Investment Management Organizations (TIMOs) and Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). Increasing numbers of private individuals and families are purchasing small rural tracts and some communities are developing innovative means to gain control over nearby forestlands in order to protect these lands from commercial real estate development. Within this context of rapid ownership change, small-scale forest owners including families and communities find themselves at a competitive disadvantage, relative to large corporate owners, in wood commodity markets. This paper considers how small-scale forest tenures, relative to large corporate tenures, may be advantageous to society with regard to selected ecological, social, and economic factors. While the paper primarily draws upon illustrations from the US Pacific Northwest, its themes are global in nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birch T (1996) Private forestland owners of the Western United States, 1994, USDA Forest Service NE Forest Experiment Station Resource Bulletin NE–137. Radnor, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss JC (1992) Evidence of ethnicity: management styles of forest owners in Wisconsin. J For Conserv Hist 36(2):63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss JC (2000) Public perceptions of clearcutting. J For 98(12):4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss JC, Martin AJ (1989) Identifying NIPF management motivations with qualitative methods. For Sci 35(2):601–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss JC, Nepal SK, Brooks RT Jr, Larsen MD (1994) Forestry community or granfalloon? J For 92(9):6–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss JC, Nepal SK, Brooks RT Jr, Larsen MD (1997) In the mainstream: environmental attitudes of mid-south NIPF owners. South J Appl For 21(1):37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton Little J (2006) Timberlands in turmoil. Am For Winter, 2006

  • Butler BJ, Leatherberry EC (2004) America’s family forest owners. J For 102(7):4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell Group (2006) Timber trends Newsletter, December 2006. Available Online at: http://www.campbellgroup.com/timber_research/

  • Egan AF, Luloff AE (2000) The exurbanization of America’s forests: research in rural social science. J For 98(3):26–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedkiw J (1983) Background paper on non-industrial private forest lands, their management, and related public and private assistance. USDA Forest Service Office of Budget Program Analysis, Office of the Secretary, WA

  • Fisher AP, Bliss JC (2006) Mental and biophysical terrains of biodiversity: Conservation of oak woodland on family forests. Soc Nat Resour 19(7):625–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes P (2007) Hyla Woods News. Electronic Newsletter, March, 2007. Oregon, Portland

  • Jamison M (2007) Timber in transition: booming values shift Plum Creek from logging to real estate. The Missoulian Newspaper, Available Online at: http://www.missoulian.com

  • MacCleery DW (1993) American forests: a history of resiliency and recovery. USDA Forest Service FS-540

  • McMahon R (1964) Private nonindustrial ownership of forest land. Yale University School of Forestry Bulletin No. 68. Yale University, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson N, DeCoster L (2000) Forest fragmentation: implications for sustainable private forests. J For 98(3):4–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith WB, Miles PD, Vissage JS, Pugh SA (2004) Forest resources of the United States, 2002, General Technical Report NC-241. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul

  • Stanfield BJ, Bliss JC, Spies TA (2003) Landownership and landscape structure: a spatial analysis of 66 Oregon Coast Range watersheds. Landsc Ecol (in press)

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2000) United States Census 2000. http://www.census.gov

  • Wilent S (2004) Investors increase timberland holdings: eight percent of “investable” US forestland held by investment managers. The Forestry Source December 2004

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA

    John C. Bliss & Erin Clover Kelly

Authors
  1. John C. Bliss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erin Clover Kelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John C. Bliss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bliss, J.C., Kelly, E.C. Comparative Advantages of Small-Scale Forestry Among Emerging Forest Tenures. Small-scale Forestry 7, 95–104 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-008-9043-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-008-9043-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation