Résumé
Notre étude s’est intéressé à l’ajustement à la maladie et à la relation conjugale chez 25 couples dont le mari est traité pour un cancer de la prostate. Les couples ont été rencontrés en début, milieu et fin de traitement où des questionnaires d’anxiété (STAI et MAS), de dépression (CESD), de qualité de vie (FACT-P, CQOLC et SF12) et de qualité de la relation conjugale (QRI) leur ont été proposés. L’analyse des résultats révèle que les patients ne présentent pas de troubles émotionnels importants, à l’inverse des conjointes qui sont plus anxieuses et dépressives que ces derniers. Ils jugent avoir une bonne qualité de vie malgré une diminution au cours du traitement chez le patient. Les patients sont satisfaits de la disponibilité et de l’intensité du soutien de leur conjointe alors que leurs conjointes perçoivent une diminution du soutien qu’elles reçoivent et une augmentation des conflits surtout au début du traitement.
Abstract
Our study looked at disease adjustment and married life for 25 couples where the husband was being treated for prostate cancer. Couples were met at the start, in the middle and at the end of treatment and anxiety (STAI and MAS), depression (CESD), quality of life (FACT-P, CQOLC and SF12) and quality of married life (QRI) questionnaires were given to them at these points. The results showed that patients themselves had no significant emotional problems; whereas their partners were more anxious and depressed than the patients. Patients reported a good quality of life in spite of a reduction during treatment. Patients were satisfied with the availability and strength of support from their partners whereas their partners reported a reduction in support and increased conflict especially at the beginning of treatment.
Références
Arnold EM (1999) The cessation of cancer treatment as a crisis. Soc Work Health Care 29(2): 21–38
Baider L, Ever-Hadani P, Goldzweig G, et al. (2003) Is perceived family support a relevant variable in psychological distress? A sample of prostate and breast cancer couples. J Psychosom Res 55(5): 453–460
Blanchard K, Proverbs-Singh T, Katner A, et al. (2005) Knowledge, attitude and beliefs of women about the importance of prostate cancer screening. J Natl Med Assoc 97(10): 1378–1385
Bruchon-Schweitzer M, Paulhan I (1993) Manuel français de l’échelle d’anxiété trait, anxiété état, de C. D. Spielberger. ECPA, Paris
Cassileth BR, Soloway MS, Vogelzang NJ, et al. (1992) Quality of life and psychosocial status in stage D prostate cancer. Qual Life Res 1(5): 323–330
Cleary PD, Morrissey G, Oster G (1995) Health-related quality of life in patients with advanced prostate cancer: A multinational perspective. Qual Life Res 4(3): 207–220
Cliff AM, MacDonagh RP (2000) Psychosocial morbidity in prostate cancer: II. A comparison of patients and partners. BJU Int 86(7): 834–839
Da Silva FC, Reis E, Costa T, Denis L (1993) Quality of life in patients with prostatic cancer: A feasibility study. Cancer 71(3): 1138–1142
Davis-Ali SH, Chesler MA, Chesney BK (1993) Recognizing cancer as a family disease: worries and support reported by patients and spouses. Soc Work Health Care 19(2): 45–65
Edwards B, Clarke V (2004) The psychological impact of a cancer diagnosis on families: the influence of family functioning and patients’ illness characteristics on depression and anxiety. Psychooncology 13(8): 562–576
Esper P, Mo F, Chodak G, et al. (1997) Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the functional assessment of cancer therapy-prostate instrument. Urology 50(6): 920–928
Fuhrer R, Rouillon F (1989) La version française de l’échelle CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale). Description et traduction de l’échelle d’autoévaluation. Psychiatrie et Psychobiologie 4: 163–166
Galbraith ME, Ramirez JM, Pedro LW (2001) Quality of life, health outcomes, and identity for patients with prostate cancer in five different treatment groups. Oncol Nurs Forum 28(3): 551–560
Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, et al. (1998) Cross-validation of item selection andscoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 51(11): 1171–1178
Given B, Given CW (1992) Patient and family reaction to new and recurrent breast cancer. J Am Med Womens Assoc 47(5): 201–206
Gore JL, Krupski T, Kwan L, et al. (2005). Partnership status infuences quality of life in low-income, uninsured men with prostate cancer. Cancer 104(1): 191–198
Greimel E, Thiel I, Peintinger F, et al. (2002) Prospective assessment of quality of life of female cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 85(1): 140–147
Korfage IJ, Essink-Bot ML, Borsboom GJJM, et al. (2005) Five-year follow-up health-related quality of life after primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 116(2): 291–296
Korfage IJ, Essink-Bot ML, Janssens ACJW, et al. (2006) Anxiety and depression after prostate cancer diagnosis and treatments: 5-Year follow-up. Br J Cancer 94(8): 1093–1098
Kornblith AB, Herr HW, Ofman US, et al. (1994) Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses: The value of a data base in clinical care. Cancer 73(11): 2791–2802
Lavery JF, Clarke VA (1999) Prostate cancer: Patients’ and spouses’ coping and marital ajustment. Psychol Health Med 4(3): 289–302
Lintz K, Moynihan C, Steginga S, et al. (2003) Prostate cancer patients’ support and psychological care needs: Survey from a nonsurgical oncology clinic. Psychooncology 12(8): 769–783
Litwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A, et al. (1995) Quality of life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer. J Am Med Assoc 273(2): 129–135
Litwin MS, Lubeck DP, Henning JM, Carroll PR (1998) Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: Result of the capsure database. Journal of Urology 159(6): 1988–1992
Llorente MD, Burke M, Gregory GR, et al. (2005) Prostate cancer: A significant risk factor for late-life suicide. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 13(3): 195–201
Ofman US (1995) Sexual quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Cancer 75: 1949–1953
Pierce G, Sarason I, Sarason B (1991) General and relationship-based perceptions of social support: Are two constructs better than one. J Pers Soc Psychol 61: 1028–1039
Radloff L (1977) The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement 1: 385–401
Roth AJ, Rosenfeld B, Kornblith AB, et al. (2003) The memorial anxiety scale for prostate cancer: Validation of a new scale to measure anxiety in men with prostate cancer. Cancer 97(11): 2910–2918
Soloway CT, Soloway MS, Kim SS, Kava BR (2005) Sexual, psychological and dyadic qualities of the prostate cancer couple. BJU Intern 95(6): 780–786
Spielberger CD (1983) Manual for the State-Trait anxiety inventory (STAI). Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto, CA
Verhofstadt L, Byusse A, Rosseel Y, Peene OJ (2006) Confirming the Three-Factor Structure of the Quality of RelationshipsInventory Within Couples. Psychol Assess 18(1): 15–21
Volk RJ, Cantor SB, Spann SJ, et al. (1997) Preferences of husbands and wives for prostate cancer screening. Arch Fam Med 6(1): 72–76
Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996). A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34(3): 220–233
Weitzner MA, Jacobsen H, Wagner, Friedland Jr. J, Cox C (1999) The Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) scale: development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer. Qual Life Res 8: 55–63
Willener R, Hantikainen V (2005) Individual quality of life following radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer. Urol Nurs 25(2): 88–90
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
About this article
Cite this article
Lafaye, A., Cousson-Gélie, F., Petit, S. et al. Cancer de la prostate et relation conjugale : point de vue du patient et de sa conjointe. Résultats préliminaires. Psycho Oncologie 1, 246–251 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-007-0056-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-007-0056-7