Skip to main content
Log in

Customized High-Temperature Bending with DIC for High-Throughput Determination of Creep Parameters: Technique, Instrumentation, and Optimization

  • Mesoscale Materials Science
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bending is emerging as an alternative to uniaxial testing for high-throughput determination of primary-cum-secondary creep parameters. This is feasible because of augmentation of cantilever bending tests with digital image correlation (DIC). Here, we provide guidelines for selecting the patterning medium, spray conditions, and other important parameters for laying high-resolution, high contrast ratio DIC speckle-patterns that are optimal for long-term creep tests performed up to 800°C. Furthermore, an experimental setup for efficiently performing creep experiments in bending at high temperatures is designed and developed. Proper choices of paint, spraying technique, high-resolution image capturing device, and the appropriate heat management system in the mechanical testing unit yield unambiguous correlation in the “DIC augmented bending creep” tests. The developed methodology and the equipment are validated by evaluating the creep behavior of a stainless steel at 750°C by obtaining multiple stress–strain rate pairs from a single test. An excellent match between uniaxial and bending data is observed, thereby paving the way for using DIC augmented bending creep for studying the creep response of materials at high temperatures in a high-throughput fashion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. One may use two cameras, mounted at an angle, and choose an appropriate software package to perform “stereo”-DIC to obtain the 2-D strain field more accurately.1 The description provided here is focused on standard 2-D DIC; however, it is general enough to be easily adapted for stereo-DIC.

  2. The thickness of the coating is determined by number of spray passes.

References

  1. M.A. Sutton, J. Orteu, and H.W. Schreier, Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements (New York: Springer, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P.F. Luo and F.C. Huang, Opt. Lasers Eng. 33, 349 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R.J. Adrian, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 261 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. V.T. Bickel, A. Manconi, and F. Amann, Remote Sens. 10, 865 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.N. Florando, M.M. LeBlanc, and D.H. Lassila, Scr. Mater. 57, 537 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J.N. Florando, M. Rhee, A. Arsenlis, M.M. Leblanc, and D.H. Lassila, Philos. Mag. Lett. 86, 795 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Sabaté, D. Vogel, A. Gollhardt, J. Marcos, I. Gràcia, C. Cané, and B. Michel, Nanotechnology 17, 5264 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Y.Z. Dai, C.J. Tay, and F.P. Chiang, Exp. Mech. 31, 348 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Choi and S.P. Shah, Exp. Mech. 37, 307 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Coburn and J. Slevin, Appl. Opt. 34, 5977 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Lu, X. Zhang, and W.G. Knauss, Polym. Eng. Sci. 37, 1053 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H.J. Sung, S.H. Park, and M.S. Kim, Exp. Fluids 40, 664 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J.A. Leendertz and J.N. Butters, J. Phys. E. 6, 1107 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Turoń, D. Ziaja, L. Buda-Ożóg, and B. Miller, Arch. Civ. Eng. 64, 31 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Liu, J. Lyons, M. Sutton, and A. Reynolds, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. Trans. ASME 120, 71 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S.I.A. Jalali, P. Kumar, and V. Jayaram, J. Mater. Res. 35, 353 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S.I.A. Jalali, P. Kumar, and V. Jayaram, J. Mater. Res. 35, 362 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ASTM E139-11(2018), Standard Test Methods for Conducting Creep, Creep-Rupture, and Stress-Rupture Tests of Metallic Materials (2018).

  19. S.I.A. Jalali, Evaluation of Power-Law Creep in Bending, IISc Bangalore (2020).

  20. S.I.A. Jalali, P. Kumar, and V. Jayaram, Scr. Mater. 186, 99 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. G. Lionello and L. Cristofolini, Meas. Sci. Technol. 25, 107001 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M.E. Kassner, Fundamentals of Creep in Metals and Alloys (Massachusetts: Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Weertman and J. Blacic, Geophys. Res. Lett. 11, 117 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S.I.A. Jalali, P. Kumar, and V. Jayaram, JOM 71, 3563 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. K.C. Sahoo, S. Goyal, V. Ganesan, J. Vanaja, G.V. Reddy, P. Padmanabhan, and K. Laha, Mater. High Temp. 36, 388 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Aeronautical Research and Development Board, India (ARDB 0242), and Ministries of Human Resource Development and Power, Government of India (IMPRN 0009) for financially supporting this work. PK also acknowledges the financial support from Tata Trust under its Short-Term Academic Visit Program at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Praveen Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jalali, S.I.A., Kumar, P. & Jayaram, V. Customized High-Temperature Bending with DIC for High-Throughput Determination of Creep Parameters: Technique, Instrumentation, and Optimization. JOM 72, 4522–4538 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04445-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04445-5

Navigation