Abstract
The global, non-ferrous smelting industry has witnessed the continual development and evolution of processing technologies in a bid to reduce operating costs and improve the safety and environmental performance of processing plants. This is particularly true in the copper industry, which has seen a number of bath smelting technologies developed and implemented during the past 30 years. The Outotec® Ausmelt Top Submerged Lance Process is one such example, which has been widely adopted in the modernisation of copper processing facilities in China and Russia. Despite improvements in the energy efficiency of modern copper smelting and converting technologies, additional innovation and development is required to further reduce energy consumption, whilst still complying with stringent environmental regulations. In response to this challenge, the Ausmelt Process has undergone significant change and improvement over the course of its history, in an effort to improve its overall competitiveness, particularly with respect to energy efficiency and operating costs. This paper covers a number of recent advances to the technology and highlights the impacts of these developments in reducing energy consumptions for a range of different copper flowsheets. It also compares the energy efficiency of the Ausmelt Process against the Bottom Blown Smelting process, which has become widely adopted in China over the past 5–10 years.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Wood and S. Hughes, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 361.
P. Coursol, P. Mackey, J. Kapusta, and N. Cardona Valencia, JOM 67, 1064 (2015).
P. Coursol, P. Mackey, and C. Diaz, Proceedings Copper 2010 (Clausthal-Zellerfeld: GDMB, 2010), p. 649.
H. Kellogg, and J. Henderson, in Extractive Metallurgy of Copper, vol. 1, ed. by J. Yannopoulos (TMS-AIME, Las Vegas, 1976), p. 373.
L. ShuaiBiao, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 1008.
S. Wang, W. Davenport, A. Siegmund, S. Yao, T. Gonzales, G. Walters, and D. George, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 322.
Y. Jie, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 1015.
China ENFI Engineering Co., Ltd, Symposium on Bottom Blowing Metallurgy, Equipment Innovation and Development, Proc (Shantai City: NFSoc, 2016), p. 43.
M. Li, C. Tong, J. Huang, and J. Wang, Symposium on Bottom Blowing Metallurgy, Equipment Innovation and Development, Proc (Shantai City: NFSoc, 2016), p. 170.
L. Liao, W. Qinmeng, T. Qinghua, and G. Xueyi, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 1252.
L. Bing, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 1265.
C. Zhixiang, S. Dianbang, W. Zhi, L. Weiqun, and R. Ruimin, Proceedings Copper 2010 (Clausthal-Zellerfeld: GDMB, 2010), p. 2527.
W. Qinmeng, G. Xueyi, and T. Qinghua, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 1159.
J. Kapusta, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 1282.
C. Li and C. Jiang, Nonferr. Smelt. 4, 28 (1997).
X. Hao, K. Cao, S. Feng, and X. Xu, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 1273.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wood, J., Hoang, J. & Hughes, S. Energy Efficiency of the Outotec® Ausmelt Process for Primary Copper Smelting. JOM 69, 1013–1020 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2322-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2322-x