Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Energy Efficiency of the Outotec® Ausmelt Process for Primary Copper Smelting

  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The global, non-ferrous smelting industry has witnessed the continual development and evolution of processing technologies in a bid to reduce operating costs and improve the safety and environmental performance of processing plants. This is particularly true in the copper industry, which has seen a number of bath smelting technologies developed and implemented during the past 30 years. The Outotec® Ausmelt Top Submerged Lance Process is one such example, which has been widely adopted in the modernisation of copper processing facilities in China and Russia. Despite improvements in the energy efficiency of modern copper smelting and converting technologies, additional innovation and development is required to further reduce energy consumption, whilst still complying with stringent environmental regulations. In response to this challenge, the Ausmelt Process has undergone significant change and improvement over the course of its history, in an effort to improve its overall competitiveness, particularly with respect to energy efficiency and operating costs. This paper covers a number of recent advances to the technology and highlights the impacts of these developments in reducing energy consumptions for a range of different copper flowsheets. It also compares the energy efficiency of the Ausmelt Process against the Bottom Blown Smelting process, which has become widely adopted in China over the past 5–10 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Wood and S. Hughes, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 361.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Coursol, P. Mackey, J. Kapusta, and N. Cardona Valencia, JOM 67, 1064 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Coursol, P. Mackey, and C. Diaz, Proceedings Copper 2010 (Clausthal-Zellerfeld: GDMB, 2010), p. 649.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Kellogg, and J. Henderson, in Extractive Metallurgy of Copper, vol. 1, ed. by J. Yannopoulos (TMS-AIME, Las Vegas, 1976), p. 373.

  5. L. ShuaiBiao, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 1008.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Wang, W. Davenport, A. Siegmund, S. Yao, T. Gonzales, G. Walters, and D. George, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Jie, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 1015.

    Google Scholar 

  8. China ENFI Engineering Co., Ltd, Symposium on Bottom Blowing Metallurgy, Equipment Innovation and Development, Proc (Shantai City: NFSoc, 2016), p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Li, C. Tong, J. Huang, and J. Wang, Symposium on Bottom Blowing Metallurgy, Equipment Innovation and Development, Proc (Shantai City: NFSoc, 2016), p. 170.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Liao, W. Qinmeng, T. Qinghua, and G. Xueyi, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 1252.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Bing, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 1265.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Zhixiang, S. Dianbang, W. Zhi, L. Weiqun, and R. Ruimin, Proceedings Copper 2010 (Clausthal-Zellerfeld: GDMB, 2010), p. 2527.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Qinmeng, G. Xueyi, and T. Qinghua, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 1159.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Kapusta, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 1282.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Li and C. Jiang, Nonferr. Smelt. 4, 28 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. X. Hao, K. Cao, S. Feng, and X. Xu, Proceedings Copper 2016 (Tokyo: MMIJ, 2016), p. 1273.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Wood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wood, J., Hoang, J. & Hughes, S. Energy Efficiency of the Outotec® Ausmelt Process for Primary Copper Smelting. JOM 69, 1013–1020 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2322-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2322-x

Keywords

Navigation