Abstract
Estimating the impact of inert-anode and wettable-cathode technologies on smelter costs must be speculative because no such technologies have yet been commercialized. Even so, some broad conclusions can be drawn about the economic merit of inert anodes in retrofit and greenfield smelter scenarios. Study suggests that retrofitting inert anodes to existing prebake cells generates insufficient economic benefit to justify this objective. Drained cathode cells offer potential for energy savings coupled with increased production, provided that the cell life is greater than three years. Unlocking the potential value of both inert anode and wettable cathode materials will require their use in vertical electrode configurations, where the impact on operating costs and, particularly, capital costs, is expected to be significant. To be economically and technically viable, vertical electrode cells will require wear rates of less than approximately 5 mm per year on the inert electrode surfaces, much less than has so far been reported.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T.M. Van Leeuwen, An Aluminum Revolution (Boston: MA: Equity Research, Credit Suisse First Boston, June 22, 2000).
S.P. Ray et al., “Electrolysis with an Inert Electrode Containing a Ferrite, Copper and Silver,” U.S. patent 5,865,980 (2 February 1999).
J.D. Weyand, “Manufacturing Processes Used For the Production of Inert Anodes,” Light Metals 1986, ed. R.E. Miller (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1986), pp. 321–339.
H. Kvande, “Inert Anodes—Cell and Smelter Energy Balances and Environmental Benefits,” (Paper presented at the 130th TMS Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 14 February 2001).
A.T. Tabereaux et al., “The Operational Performance of 70 kA Prebake Cells Retrofitted with TiB2-G Cathode Elements,” Light Metals 1998, ed. B.J. Welch (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1998), pp. 257–264.
G.D. Brown et al., “TiB2 Coated Aluminium Reduction Cells: Status and Future Direction of Coated Cells in Comalco,” Proc. 6th Australasian Aluminium Smelting Workshop ed. B.J. Welch and M. Skyllas-Kazacos, University of NSW, Sydney, (1998), pp. 499–508.
A.F. La Camera et al., “Process and Apparatus for Low Temperature Electrolysis of Oxides,” U.S. patent 5,415,742 (16 May 1995).
R.K. Dawless et al., “Molten Salt Bath Circulation Design for an Electrolytic Cell,” U.S. patent 5,938,914 (17 August 1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
For more information, contact Jeff Keniry, Alumination Consulting Pty. Ltd., 2 Governors Drive, Mt. Macedon, VIC 3441, Australia; +61-3-5426-4124; fax +61-3-5426-4248; e-mail jkeniry@netcon.net.au.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keniry, J. The economics of inert anodes and wettable cathodes for aluminum reduction cells. JOM 53, 43–47 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-001-0209-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-001-0209-2