Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of the eight-Plate for angular correction of knee deformities due to idiopathic and pathologic physis: initiating treatment according to etiology

  • Original Clinical Article
  • Published:
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics

Abstract

Purpose

Angular deformities of the knee resulting from idiopathic, congenital, or acquired causes are commonly encountered in pediatric orthopedics. Whereas physiological deformities should be treated expectantly, the remaining often progress enough to warrant operative treatment, despite attempted bracing. Historical methods of surgical treatment (e.g., epiphysiodesis and stapling) have yielded to the increasingly popular method of reversible guided growth using the eight-Plate.

Methods

We studied 58 patients with knee angular deformities managed with eight-Plate guided growth. All etiologies except physiological deformities and those with very slow growth rate were included. Each patient was under appropriate medical management during the entire duration of treatment and after plate removal.

Results

In the dysplasia/syndrome group, we noted complete correction in 22 patients (78.5%), partial correction in 5 (17.9%), and no correction in 1 patient (3.6%). All cases of idiopathic deformities resolved. Patients with osteochondral dysplasias and genetic syndromes underwent earlier intervention and slower correction than those with idiopathic genu varum or valgum. The time difference in reaching a neutral mechanical axis between the two groups (11 months in idiopathic versus 18 months in pathological physis) could be explained by a significant difference in growth speeds (P = 0.003).

Conclusion

Results indicate that early intervention is advisable for patients with osteochondral dysplasias/syndromes as subsequent correction takes longer. If rebound growth causing recurrent deformity occurs, guided growth can be safely repeated. Additionally, complications reported with other techniques such as hardware failure, physeal violation by the implant, premature physeal closure, and overcorrection were not reported while using the eight-Plate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stevens P (2006) Guided growth: 1933 to the present. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 1(1):29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks WC, Gross RH (1995) Genu varum in children: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 3(6):326–335

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fabry G, MacEwen GD, Shands AR Jr (1973) Torsion of the femur. A follow-up study in normal and abnormal conditions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55(8):1726–1738

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stevens PM, Klatt JB (2008) Guided growth for pathological physes: radiographic improvement during realignment. J Pediatr Orthop 28(6):632–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mycoskie P (1981) Complication of osteotomies about the knee in children. Orthopedics 4:1005–1015

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steel HH, Sandrow RE, Sullivan PD (1971) Complications of tibial osteotomy in children for genu varum or valgum. Evidence that neurological changes are due to ischemia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 53(8):1629–1635

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blount WP, Clarke GR (1949) Control of bone growth by epiphyseal stapling; a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 31A(3):464–478

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bylski-Austrow DI, Wall EJ, Rupert MP, Roy DR, Crawford AH (2001) Growth plate forces in the adolescent human knee: a radiographic and mechanical study of epiphyseal staples. J Pediatr Orthop 21(6):817–823

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frantz CH (1971) Epiphyseal stapling: a comprehensive review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 77:149–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zuege RC, Kempken TG, Blount WP (1979) Epiphyseal stapling for angular deformity at the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61(3):320–329

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brockway A, Craig WA, Cockreli BR Jr (1954) End-result study of sixty-two stapling operations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36(5):1063–1070

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mielke CH, Stevens PM (1996) Hemiepiphyseal stapling for knee deformities in children younger than 10 years: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop 16(4):423–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stevens PM, Maguire M, Dales MD, Robins AJ (1999) Physeal stapling for idiopathic genu valgum. J Pediatr Orthop 19(5):645–649

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Métaizeau J-P, Wong-Chung J, Bertrand H, Pasquier P (1998) Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws (PETS). J Pediatr Orthop 18(3):363–369

    Google Scholar 

  15. Burghardt R, Herzenberg J, Standard S, Paley D (2008) Temporary hemiepiphyseal arrest using a screw and plate device to treat knee and ankle deformities in children: a preliminary report. J Child Orthop 2(3):187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stevens PM, Pease F (2006) Hemiepiphysiodesis for posttraumatic tibial valgus. J Pediatr Orthop 26(3):385–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nouth F, Kuo LA (2004) Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws (PETS): prospective case study and review. J Pediatr Orthop 24(6):721–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Novais E, Stevens PM (2006) Hypophosphatemic rickets: the role of hemiepiphysiodesis. J Pediatr Orthop 26(2):238–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ballal MS, Bruce CE, Nayagam S (2010) Correcting genu varum and genu valgum in children by guided growth: temporary hemiepiphysiodesis using tension band plates. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(2):273–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stevens PM (2007) Guided growth for angular correction: a preliminary series using a tension band plate. J Pediatr Orthop 27(3):253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schroerlucke S, Bertrand S, Clapp J, Bundy J, Gregg FO (2009) Failure of Orthofix eight-Plate for the treatment of Blount disease. J Pediatr Orthop 29(1):57–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Salenius P, Vankka E (1975) The development of the tibiofemoral angle in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57(2):259–261

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heath CH, Staheli LT (1993) Normal limits of knee angle in white children-genu varum and genu valgum. J Pediatr Orthop 13(2):259–262

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kling TF Jr, Hensinger RN (1983) Angular and torsional deformities of the lower limbs in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 176:136–147

    Google Scholar 

  25. Levine AM, Drennan JC (1982) Physiological bowing and tibia vara. The metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle in the measurement of bowleg deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64(8):1158–1163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Elena Carzana for her assistance with this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Largo G. Gaslini, 5, 16147, Genoa, Italy

    Silvio Boero, Maria Beatrice Michelis & Simone Riganti

Authors
  1. Silvio Boero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Beatrice Michelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Simone Riganti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvio Boero.

About this article

Cite this article

Boero, S., Michelis, M.B. & Riganti, S. Use of the eight-Plate for angular correction of knee deformities due to idiopathic and pathologic physis: initiating treatment according to etiology. J Child Orthop 5, 209–216 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-011-0344-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-011-0344-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation