Abstract
We critically review and compare fifteen mixed and mixed-hybrid nonlinear shell finite element formulations with 4 nodes in order to identify those that are closest to the “optimal” one. We consider formulations that are based either on Assumed Natural Strain concept, Enhanced Assumed Strain concept, Hellinger–Reissner functional or Hu–Washizu functional, and those that effectively combine several of the mentioned approaches. Most of the formulations are state-of-the-art, but some are also presented for the first time. We show that the flexibility of mixed-hybrid formulations requires careful consideration of theoretical and numerical aspects in the process of design of a high-performance element. We make extensive numerical experiments in order to assess convergence properties, mesh distortion sensitivity, and computational speed (that is associated with the ability to achieve large steps during the solution search) of the considered formulations. We show that the application of the idea to combine mixed-hybrid formulations of the Hellinger–Reissner and Hu–Washizu type with the Assumed Natural Strain and/or the Enhanced Assumed Strain concepts generates the formulations that perform excellent. We also identify the formulations that are currently closest to the “optimal” one.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abaqus (2018) Abaqus Manuals. Dassoult Systems, Providence
Andelfinger U, Ramm E (1993) EAS-elements for two-dimensional, three-dimensional, plate and shell structures and their equivalence to HR-elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 36:1311–1337. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620360805
Basar Y, tskov M, Eckstein A (2000) Composite laminates: nonlinear interlaminar stress analysis by multi-layer shell elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 185(2–4):367–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00267-4
Bathe KJ (2014) Finite Element Procedures, 2nd edn. KJ Bathe, Watertown
Bathe KJ, Dvorkin EN (1986) A formulation of general shell elements—the use of mixed interpolation of tensorial components. Int J Numer Meth Eng 22(3):697–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620220312
Bathe KJ, Iosilevich A, Chapelle D (2000) An evaluation of the MITC shell elements. Comput Struct 75:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00214-X
Baumann M, Schweizerhof K, Andrussow S (1994) An efficient mixed hybrid 4-node shell element with assumed stresses for membrane, bending and shear parts. Eng Comput 11(1):69–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644409410799164
Benson D, Bazilevs Y, Hsu M, Hughes TJ (2010) Isogeometric shell analysis: the Reissner-Mindlin shell. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(5–8):276–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CMA.2009.05.011
Benson D, Bazilevs Y, Hsu M, Hughes TJ (2011) A large deformation, rotation-free, isogeometric shell. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(13–16):1367–1378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.12.003
Betsch P, Gruttmann F, Stein E (1996) A 4-node finite shell element for the implementation of general hyperelastic 3D-elsticity at finite strains. Comput Methods Appl Mech. Engrg 130(1–2):57–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(95)00920-5
Betsch P, Menzel A, Stein E (1998) On the parametrization of finite rotations in computational mechanics A classification of concepts with application to smooth shells. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 155:273–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00158-8
Betsch P, Stein E (1995) An assumed strain approach avoiding artificial thickness straining for a nonlinear 4-node shell element. Commun Numer Methods Eng 11:899–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.1640111104
Bischoff M, Ramm E (1997) Shear deformable shell elements for large strains and rotations. Int J Numer Meth Eng 40(23):4427–4449. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19971215)40:23%3c4427:AID-NME268%3e3.0.CO;2-9
Bischoff M, Ramm E, Braess D (1999) A class of equivalent enhanced assumed strain and hybrid stress finite elements. Comput Mech 22:443–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004660050378
Brank B (2008) Assessment of 4-node EAS-ANS shell elements for large deformation analysis. Comput Mech 42:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-007-0233-3
Brank B, Ibrahimbegovic A (2001) On the relation between different parametrizations of finite rotations for shells. Eng Comput 18:950–973. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644400110403984
Brank B, Korelc J, Ibrahimbegovic A (2002) Nonlinear shell problem formulation accounting for through-the-thickness stretching and its finite element implementation. Comput Struct 80(9–10):699–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00042-1
Brank B, Perić D, Damjanić FB (1997) On large deformations of thin elasto-plastic shells: implementation of a finite rotation model for quadrilateral shell element. Int J Numer Methods Eng 40:689–726. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19970228)40:4%3c689:AID-NME85%3e3.0.CO;2-7
César de Sá JMA, Natal Jorge RM, Fontes Valente RA, Almeida Areias PM (2002) Development of shear locking-free shell elements using an enhanced assumed strain formulation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 53(7):1721–1750. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.360
Choi CK, Paik JG (1996) An effective four node degenerated shell element for geometrically nonlinear analysis. Thin-Walled Structures 24(3):261–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8231(95)00037-2
Crisfield MA (1991) Non-linear finite element analysis of solids and structures, vol. 1: essentials. Wiley, Chichester
Crisfield MA (1996) Non-linear finite element analysis of solids and structures, vol. 2: advanced topics. Wiley, Chichester
Daszkiewicz K, Witkowski W, Burzyński S, Chróścielewski J (2019) Robust four-node elements based on Hu–Washizu principle for nonlinear analysis of Cosserat shells. Continuum Mech Thermodyn 31(6):1757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-019-00767-1
Dujc J, Brank B (2012) Stress resultant plasticity for shells revisited. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 247:146–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2012.07.012
Dvorkin EN, Bathe KJ (1984) A continuum mechanics based four-node shell element for general nonlinear analysis. Eng Comput 1(1):77–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb023562
Echter R, Oesterle B, Bischoff M (2012) A hierarchic family of isogeometric shell finite elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 254:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2012.10.018
Euclidean space, Math - Conversion Matrix to Quaternion. http://www.euclideanspace.com/maths/geometry/rotations/conversions/matrixToQuaternion/. Visited on 21 Aug 2020
Gee M, Ramm E, Wall WA (2005) Parallel multilevel solution of nonlinear shell structures. Comput. Methods Appl Mech Engrg 194:2513–2533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2004.07.043
Goto Y, Watanabe Y, Kasugai T, Obata M (1992) Elastic buckling phenomenon applicable to deployable rings. Int J Solids Struct 29(7):893–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(92)90024-N
Greco L, Cuomo M, Contrafatto L (2018) A reconstructed local B formulation for isogeometric Kirchhoff-Love shells. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 332:462–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.01.005
Gruttmann F, Wagner W (2005) A linear quadrilateral shell element with fast stiffness computation. Comp Methods Appl Mech Engrg 194:4279–4300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2004.11.005
Gruttmann F, Wagner W (2006) Structural analysis of composite laminates using a mixed hybrid shell element. Comput Mech 37:479–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-005-0730-1
Ibrahimbegovic A (1997) On the choice of finite rotation parameters. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 149(1–4):49–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00059-5
Ibrahimbegović A (2009) Nonlinear solid mechanics. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht
Ibrahimbegović A, Brank B, Courtois P (2001) Stress resultant geometrically exact form of classical shell model and vector-like parameterization of constrained finite rotations. Int J Numer Meth Eng 52(11):1235–1252. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.247
Intel MKL Pardiso solver cookbook. Available at: https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/documentation/mkl-cookbook/top.html. visited on 27 Aug 2020
Iwicki P, Tejchman J, Chróścielewski J (2014) Dynamic FE simulations of buckling process in thin-walled cylindrical metal silos. Thin-Walled Struct 84:344–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2014.07.011
Klinkel S, Gruttmann F, Wagner W (2007) A mixed shell formulation accounting for thickness strains and finite strain 3d material models. Int J Numer Methods Eng 74:945–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2199
Knight NF (1997) Raasch challenge for shell elements. AIAA J 35(2):375–381. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.104
Ko Y, Lee PS, Bathe KJ (2016) The MITC4 + shell element and its performance. Comput Struct 169:57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.002
Ko Y, Lee PS, Bathe KJ (2017) A new MITC4 + shell element. Comput Struct 182:404–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.11.004
Ko Y, Lee PS, Bathe KJ (2017) The MITC4 + shell element in geometric nonlinear analysis. Comput Struct 185:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.01.015
Ko Y, Lee Y, Lee PS, Bathe KJ (2017) Performance of the MITC3 + and MITC4 + shell elements in widely-used benchmark problems. Comput Struct 193:187–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.08.003
Korelc J (2020) AceGen manual, AceFEM manual. http://symech.fgg.uni-lj.si/. Accessed 18 Jan 2021
Korelc J, Wriggers P (2016) Automation of finite element methods. Springer, Berlin
Kulikov GM, Plotnikova SV (2010) A family of ANS four-node exact geometry shell elements in general convected curvilinear coordinates. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83(10):1376–1406. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2872
Lavrenčič M, Brank B (2018) Simulation of shell buckling by implicit dynamics and numerically dissipative schemes. Thin-Walled Struct 132:682–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.08.010
Lavrenčič M, Brank B (2019) Hybrid-mixed shell quadrilateral that allows for large solution steps and is low-sensitive to mesh distortion. Comput Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01759-3
Lavrenčič M, Brank B, Brojan M (2020) Multiple wrinkling mode transitions in axially compressed cylindrical shell-substrate in dynamics. Thin-Walled Struct 150:106700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106700
Lee PS, Bathe KJ (2002) On the asymptotic behavior of shell structures and the evaluation in finite element solutions. Comput Struct 80:235–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-7949(02)00009-3
Macneal RH, Harder RL (1985) A proposed standard set of problems to test finite element accuracy. Finite Elem Anal Des 1(1):3–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-874X(85)90003-4
Magisano D, Leonetti L, Garcea G (2017) Advantages of the mixed format in geometrically nonlinear analysis of beams and shells using solid finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 109:1237–1262. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5322
Mäkinen J (2008) Rotation manifold SO(3) and its tangential vectors. Comput Mech 42(6):907–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-008-0293-z
McAuliffe C, Waisman H (2014) A Pian-Sumihara type element for modeling shear bands at finite deformation. Comput Mech 53:925–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0940-x
Nguyen CU, Ibrahimbegovic A (2020) Hybrid-stress triangular finite element with enhanced performance for statics and dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng (In editorial process)
Oesterle B, Sachse R, Ramm E, Bischoff M (2017) Hierarchic isogeometric large rotation shell elements including linearized transverse shear parametrization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 321:383–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.03.031
Pian THH, Sumihara K (1984) Rational approach for assumed stress finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 20(9):1685–1695. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620200911
Polat C (2010) A parametric study for four node bilinear EAS shell elements. J Mech 26(04):431–438. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1727719100004639
Porenta L, Brank B, Dujc J, Brojan M, Tušek J (2020) A shell finite element model for superelasticity of shape memory alloys. In: Altenbach H, Chinchaladze N, Kienzler R, Müller W (eds) Analysis of shells, plates, and beams. Advanced structured materials, vol 134. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47491-1_20
Rafiee R, Moghadam RM (2014) On the modeling of carbon nanotubes: a critical review. Compos Part B Eng 56:435–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.037
Simo JC, Armero F (1992) Geometrically non-linear enhanced strain mixed methods and the method of incompatible modes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 33(7):1413–1449. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620330705
Simo JC, Fox DD (1989) On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part I: formulation and optimal parametrization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 72:267–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(89)90002-9
Simo JC, Fox DD, Rifai MS (1989) On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part II: the linear theory; computational aspects. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 73:53–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(89)90098-4
Simo JC, Fox DD, Rifai MS (1990) On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part III: computational aspects of the nonlinear theory. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 79:21–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(90)90094-3
Simo JC, Hughes TJR (1986) On the variational foundations of assumed strain methods. J Appl Mech 53(1):51–54. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3171737
Simo JC, Rifai MS (1990) A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 29:1595–1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620290802
Simo JC, Rifai MS, Fox DD (1990) On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part IV: variable thickness shells with through-the-thickness stretching. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 81:91–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(90)90143-A
Stanić A, Brank B, Korelc J (2016) On path following methods for structural failure problems. Comput Mech 58:281–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-016-1294-y
Sze KY, Liu XH, Lo SH (2004) Popular benchmark problems for geometric nonlinear analysis of shells. Finite Elem Anal Des 40:1551–1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2003.11.001
Veldin T, Lavrenčič M, Brank B, Brojan M (2020) A comparison of computational models for wrinkling of pressurized core-shell systems (In editorial process)
Veldin T, Brank B, Brojan M (2019) Computational finite element model for surface wrinkling of shells on soft substrates. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 79(104863):1–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.104863
Vu-Quoc L, Tan XG (2003) Optimal solid shells for nonlinear analyses of multilayer composites. I: statics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192(9–10):975–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00435-8
Wagner W, Gruttmann F (2005) A robust non-linear mixed hybrid quadrilateral shell element. Int J Numer Methods Eng 64:635–666. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1387
Wagner W, Gruttmann F (2020) An improved quadrilateral shell element based on the Hu–Washizu functional. Adv Model Simul Eng Sci 7:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-020-00162-5
Washizu K (1982) Variational methods in elasticity and plasticity, 3rd edn. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Wiśniewski K (2010) Finite rotation shells, basic equations and finite elements for Reissner kinematics. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht
Wisniewski K, Turska E (2008) Improved four-node Hellinger-Reissner elements based on skew coordinates. Int J Numer Methods Eng 76:798–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2343
Wisniewski K, Turska E (2009) Improved 4-node Hu–Washizu elements based on skew coordinates. Comput Struct 87:407–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.01.011
Wisniewśki K, Turska E (2017) Selected topics on mixed/enhanced four-node shell elements with drilling rotation. In: Altenbach H, Eremeyev V (eds) Shell-like structures advanced theories and applications. Springer Nature, Switzerland
Wisniewski K, Wagner W, Turska E, Gruttmann F (2010) Four-node Hu–Washizu elements based on skew coordinates and contravariant assumed strain. Comput Struct 88:1278–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.07.008
Wolfram Research Inc. (2019) Mathematica Version 11.3. Champaign, IL
Wriggers P (2008) Nonlinear finite element methods. Springer, New York
Yu G, Xie X, Carstensen C (2011) Uniform convergence and a posteriori error estimation for assumed stress hybrid finite element methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200:2421–2433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2011.03.018
Yu G, Xie X, Carstensen C (2011) Uniform convergence and a posteriori error estimation for assumed stress hybrid finite element methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(29–32):2421–2433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2011.03.018
Yuan KY, Huang YS, Pian THH (1993) New strategy for assumed stresses for 4-node hybrid stress membrane element. Int J Numer Methods Eng 36:1747–1763. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620361009
Zupan E, Saje M, Zupan D (2009) The quaternion-based three-dimensional beam theory. Comput Methods Appl Mech 198(49–52):3944–3956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2009.09.002
Funding
This study was funded by the Slovenian Research Agency (Grant Number J2-1722).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lavrenčič, M., Brank, B. Hybrid-Mixed Low-Order Finite Elements for Geometrically Exact Shell Models: Overview and Comparison. Arch Computat Methods Eng 28, 3917–3951 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09537-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09537-2