Abstract
Reliable prediction of damage and failure in structural parts is a major challenge posed in engineering mechanics. Damage criterion is one of the most useful pieces of information about the RC structures when subjected to extreme dynamic loads. The damage index is the numerical approach to quantify the damage following a blast or an earthquake. The damage index was used to identify the capacity degradation of the structural elements under high strain rate loads. The few investigations conducted on evaluation of damage criterion and mode of failure for RC structures when subjected to blast loads. Therefore, the overall aim of this research is to overview on the damage criterion and failure modes of RC structures when subjected to extreme dynamic loads. In this study different damage criterion are demonstrated for structural elements. The results indicate the damage criterion using residual axial load carrying capacity is the appropriate method to evaluate the damage degree in columns as well as three main damage modes are observed for RC columns when subjected to blast loads. Also the maximum support rotation is a suitable approach to determine the level of damage in RC panel and slabs. The data collected from this research are being used to improve the knowledge of how structures will respond to a blast event, and improve analytical models for predicting the level of damage in concrete structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Qu J, Fan M (2010) The current state of water quality and technology development for water pollution control in China. Critical Rev Environ Sci Techn 40:519–560
Chan S, Fawaz Z, Behdinan K, Amid R (2007) Ballistic limit prediction using a numerical model with progressive damage capability. Compos Struct 77:466–474
Cui J, Shi Y, Li Z-X, Chen L (2015) Failure analysis and damage assessment of RC columns under close-in explosions. J Perform Constr Facil 29:B4015003
Eskew EL, Jang S (2014) Damage assessment of a building subjected to a terrorist attack. Adv Struct Eng 17:1693–1704
Abedini M, Mutalib AA, Raman SN, Akhlaghi E, Mussa MH, Ansari M (2017) Numerical investigation on the non-linear response of reinforced concrete (RC) columns subjected to extreme dynamic loads. J Asian Sci Res 7:86
Mussa MH, Mutalib AA, Hamid R, Naidu SR, Radzi NAM, Abedini M (2017) Assessment of damage to an underground box tunnel by a surface explosion. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 66:64–76
Abedini M, Mutalib AA, Baharom S, Hao H (2013) Reliability analysis of PI diagram formula for RC column subjected to blast load. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Civ Environ Struct Constr Archit Eng 7:589–593
Kappos AJ (1997) Seismic damage indices for RC buildings: evaluation of concept and procedures. Struct Eng Mater 1–1:78–87
Sasani M (2008) Response of a reinforced concrete infilled-frame structure to removal of two adjacent columns. Eng Struct 30:2478–2491
Williams MS, Villemure I, Sexsmith RG (1997) Evaluation of seismic damage indices for concrete elements loaded in combined shear and flexure. ACI Struct J 94:315–322
Golafshani A, Bakhshi A, Tabeshpour MR (2005) Vulnerability and damage analysis of existing buildings. Asian J Civ Eng (Build Hous) 6:85–100
Gholipour G, Zhang C, Mousavi AA (2018) Effects of axial load on nonlinear response of RC columns subjected to lateral impact load: Ship-pier collision. Eng Fail Anal 91:397–418
Shi Y, Stewart MG (2015) Spatial reliability analysis of explosive blast load damage to reinforced concrete columns. Struct Saf 53:13–25
Abedini M, Mutalib AA, Raman SN (2017) PI diagram generation for reinforced concrete (RC) columns under high impulsive loads using ale method. J Asian Sci Res 7:253
Zhang C, Gholipour G, Mousavi AA (2019) Nonlinear dynamic behavior of simply-supported RC beams subjected to combined impact-blast loading. Eng Struct 181:124–142
Mills CA (1987) The design of concrete structures to resist explosions and weapon effects. In: Proceedings of 1st international conference on concrete for hazard protection, Edinburgh, pp 61–73
Gebbeken N, Ruppert M (1999) On the safety and reliability of high dynamic hydrocode simulations. Int J Numer Meth Eng 46:839–851
SwRi Facility and component explosive damage assessment program (FACEDAP). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, Omaha, NE1994
Conrath EJ, Krauthammer T, Marchand KA, Mlakar PF (1999) Structural design for physical security-state of the practical report. ASCE Publications, Reston
HMSO (1991) Building and buildings: the building regulations, 1991, London
BSI (1996) BS 6399: loading for buildings; part 1: code of practice for dead and imposed loads. BSI, London
BSI (2000) BS5950: structural use of steelwork in building; part 1: code of practice for design—rolled and welded sections. BSI, London
Krauthammer T (2004) AISC research on structural steel to resist blast and progressive collapse. Protective Technology Center, Penn State University, State College
Shi Y, Hao H, Li Z-X (2008) Numerical derivation of pressure–impulse diagrams for prediction of RC column damage to blast loads. Int J Impact Eng 35:1213–1227
Mutalib AA, Abedini M, Baharom S, Hao H (2013) Derivation of empirical formulae to predict pressure and impulsive asymptotes for PI diagrams of one-way rc panels. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Civ Environ Struct Constr Archit Eng 7:585–588
Hodi B (2009) Effect of blockage and densimetric Froude number on circular bridge pier local scour. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master of Applied Science, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, pp 1–98
Fallah AS, Louca LA (2007) Pressure–impulse diagrams for elastic-plastic-hardening and softening single-degree-of-freedom models subjected to blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 34:823–842
Mutalib AA, Hao H (2011) Development of P–I diagrams for FRP strengthened RC columns. Int J Impact Eng 38:290–304
Mutalib AA, Hao H (2011) Numerical analysis of FRP-composite-strengthened RC panels with anchorages against blast loads. J Perform Constr Facil 25:360–372
Abedini M, Mutalib A, Raman S, Baharom S, Nouri J (2017) Prediction of residual axial load carrying capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) columns subjected to extreme dynamic loads. Am J Eng Appl Sci 10:431–448
MacGregor J (1996) Reinforced concrete: mechanics and design. Professional technical reference. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Mutalib AA, Tawil NM, Baharom S, Abedini M (2013) Failure probabilities of FRP strengthened RC column to blast loads. Jurnal Teknologi 65(2):135–142
Cui J, Shi Y, Li Z-X, Chen L (2015) “Failure analysis and damage assessment of RC columns under close-in explosions. J Perform Constr Facil 0:B4015003
Abedini M (2017) Development of pressure–impulse model predicting damage level in reinforced concrete column subjected to blast loading. DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia, Bangi
Krauthammer T (2008) Pressure–impulse diagrams and their applications. Mod Prot Struct 325–371
Ma G, Huang X, Li J (2008) Damage assessment for buried structures against internal blast load. Trans Tianjin Univ 14:353–357
Link O (2006) Time scale of scour around a cylindrical pier in sand and gravel. In: Third Chinese–German joint symposium on coastal and ocean engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Nov, 2006, pp 8–16
Ngo T, Mendis P, Gupta A, Ramsay J (2007) Blast loading and blast effects on structures—an overview. eJSE Load Struct 7:76–91
Biggs JM (1964) Introduction to structural dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York
Krauthammer T, Shahriar S, Shanaa HM (1990) Response of reinforced concrete elements to severe impulsive loads. J Struct Eng 116:1061–1079
Mendis P, Ngo T (2005) Vibration and shock problems of civil engineering structures. In Vibration monitoring, testing, and instrumentation, pp 475–514. CRC Press
Shi Y, Stewart MG (2015) Damage and risk assessment for reinforced concrete wall panels subjected to explosive blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 85:5–19
UFC-3-340-02 (2008) Design of structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. US Army Corps of Engineers, Naval Facilities Engineering Command (ed) Air Force Civil Engineer Support Agency, Dept of the Army and Defense Special Weapons Agency, Washington
Syed ZI, Mendis P, Lam NT, Ngo T (2006) Concrete damage assessment for blast load using pressure–impulse diagrams. In: Earthquake engineering in Australia, Canberra, pp 24–26
Zhou X, Kuznetsov V, Hao H, Waschl J (2008) Numerical prediction of concrete slab response to blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 35:1186–1200
Shope RL (2007) Comparisons of an alternative pressure–impulse (P–I) formulation with experimental and finite element results. In: The international symposium on the effects of munitions with structures (ISIEMS) 12.1
Wang W, Zhang D, Lu F, Wang S-C, Tang F (2013) Experimental study and numerical simulation of the damage mode of a square reinforced concrete slab under close-in explosion. Eng Fail Anal 27:41–51
Sorensen A, McGill WL (2011) What to look for in the aftermath of an explosion? A review of blast scene damage observables. Eng Fail Anal 18:836–845
Abedini M, Mutalib AA, Raman SN, Akhlaghi E (2018) Modeling the effects of high strain rate loading on RC columns using Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) technique. Revista Internacional de Métodos Numéricos para Cálculo y Diseño en Ingeniería 34:1. https://doi.org/10.23967/j.rimni.2017.12.001
Morrill K, Malvar L, Crawford J, Ferritto J (2004) Blast resistant design and retrofit of reinforced concrete columns and walls. In: Proceedings of the 2004 structures congress–building on the past: securing the future. Nashville, pp 1–8
Abedini M, Mutalib AA, Raman SN, Alipour R, Akhlaghi E (2018) Pressure–impulse (P–I) diagrams for reinforced concrete (RC) structures: a review. Arch Comput Methods Eng 1–35
Krauthammer T (ed) (2008) Pressure-impulse diagrams and their applications. In: Modern protective structures, civil and environmental engineering, CRC Press, pp 325–371
Fujikura S, Bruneau M (2011) Experimental investigation of seismically resistant bridge piers under blast loading. J Bridge Eng 16:63–71
Ngo TD (2005) Behaviour of high strength concrete subject to impulsive loading (Doctoral dissertation)
Riedel W, Mayrhofer C, Thoma K, Stolz A (2010) Engineering and numerical tools for explosion protection of reinforced concrete. Int J Prot Struct 1:85–102
Weerheijm J, Mediavilla J, Doormaal JCAM (2008) Damage and residual strength prediction of blast loaded RC panels. TNO Defence, Security and Safety, Rijswijk
Muszynski LC, Purcell MR (2003) Use of composite reinforcement to strengthen concrete and air-entrained concrete masonry walls against air blast. J Compos Constr 7:98–108
Ma GW, Shi HJ, Shu DW (2007) P-I diagram method for combined failure modes of rigid-plastic beams,”. Int J Impact Eng 34:1081–1094
Menkes SB, Opat HJ (1973) Tearing and shear failures in explosively loaded clamped beams. Exp Mech 13:480–486
Teeling-Smith RG, Nurick GN (1991) The deformation and tearing of thin circular plates subjected to impulsive loads. Int J Impact Eng 11:77–91
Nurick GN, Shave GC (1996) The deformation and rupture of blast loaded square plates. Int J Impact Eng 18:99–116
Olson MD, Nurick GN, Fagnan JR (1993) Deformation and rupture of blast loaded square plates—predictions and experiments. Int J Impact Eng 1993:2
Ma GW, Huang X, Li JC (2010) Simplified damage assessment method for buried structures against external blast load. J Struct Eng 136:603–612
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for financial support under Grant ERGS-1-2013-PK04-UKM-02-1and FRGS-1-2015-TK01-UKM-02-4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abedini, M., Mutalib, A.A. Investigation into Damage Criterion and Failure Modes of RC Structures When Subjected to Extreme Dynamic Loads. Arch Computat Methods Eng 27, 501–515 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09317-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09317-z