Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Young leaf protection in the shrub Leea glabra in south-west China: the role of extrafloral nectaries and ants

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field experiments on Leea glabra in its natural forest habitat of southern Yunnan, China were conducted to study the effects of artificial damage of young and old leaves on extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) secretion quantity and sugar concentration, as well as the effects on ant abundance on the plants following the damage treatments. We found there were no rapid changes in extrafloral nectar volume or nectar sugar concentration which would indicate an induced reaction following artificial damage. However, both cutting and punching of young leaves resulted in a significant increase (2–4-fold) of ants within 6 h after damage compared to undamaged controls. In another experiment, disks of fresh young L. glabra leaves that were pinned on young leaves of another L.glabra plant also resulted in a significant increase in the number of ants compared to treatment with paper disks, indicating that ants were most probably attracted by volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released from damaged young leaves. Furthermore, we found that portion of damaged leaf area of young leaves was significantly lower than that of old leaves and the concentration of tannins was significantly higher in young than in medium and old leaves. In conclusion, our results show that young leaves of L. glabra are protected against attacks by herbivores by multiple mechanisms, which include: (1) the activity of EFNs, which attract different ant species from the surrounding ground; (2) a mechanism induced by the damage of young leaves, which leads to rapidly increased ant recruitment and is most probably caused by the release of volatiles from damaged leaf and (3) a higher allocation of tannins in young than in older leaves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal AA (1998a) Leaf damage and associated cues induce aggressive ant recruitment in a neotropical ant-plant. Ecology 79:2100–2112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA (1998b) Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance. Science 279:1201–1202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA, Dubin-Thaler BJ (1999) Induced responses to herbivory in the Neotropical ant-plant association between Azteca ants and Cecropia trees: response of ants to potential inducing cues. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA, Rutter MT (1998) Dynamic anti-herbivore defense in ant-plants: the role of induced responses. Oikos 83:227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bialczyk J, Lechowski Z, Libik A (1999) The protective action of tannins against glasshouse whitefly in tomato seedlings. J Agric Sci 133:197–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruna EM, Lapola DM, Vasconcelos HL (2004) Interspecific variation in the defensive responses of obligate plant-ants: experimental tests and consequences for herbivory. Oecologia 138:558–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain SA, Holland JN (2009) Body size predicts degree in ant-plant mutualistic networks. Funct Ecol 23:196–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD (1986) Costs and benefits of defense by tannins in a neotropical tree. Oecologia 70:238–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD, Lokvam J, Rudolph K, Bromberg K, Sackett TE, Wright L, Brenes-Arguedas T, Dvorett D, Ring S, Clark A, Baptiste C, Pennington RT, Kursar TA (2005) Divergent defensive strategies of young leaves in two species of inga. Ecology 86:2633–2643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grangier J, Dejean A, Male PJG, Orivel J (2008) Indirect defense in a highly specific ant-plant mutualism. Naturwissenschaften 95:909–916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M (2008) Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytol 178:41–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M, Fiala B, Baumann B, Linsenmair KE (2000) Temporal, spatial and biotic variations in extrafloral nectar secretion by Macaranga tanarius. Funct Ecol 14:749–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M, Koch T, Hilpert A, Fiala B, Boland W, Linsenmair KE (2001) Extrafloral nectar production of the ant-associated plant, Macaranga tanarius, is an induced, indirect, defensive response elicited by jasmonic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1083–1088

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inui Y, Itioka T (2007) Species-specific leaf volatile compounds of obligate Macaranga myrmecophytes and host-specific aggressiveness of symbiotic Crematogaster ants. J Chem Ecol 33:2054–2063

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koptur S (1989) Is extra-floral nectar production an inducible defense? In: Bock JH, Linhart YB (eds) The evolutionary ecology of plants. Westview, Boulder, pp 323–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Koptur S (1992) Interactions between insects and plants mediated by extrafloral nectaries. In: Bernays EA (ed) CRC Series on Insect/Plant Interactions, vol 4. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 85–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Koricheva J, Nykanen H, Gianoli E (2004) Meta-analysis of trade-offs among plant antiherbivore defenses: are plants jacks-of-all-trades, masters of all? Am Nat 163:E64–E75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kursar TA, Coley PD (2003) Convergence in defense syndromes of young leaves in tropical rainforests. Biochem Syst Ecol 31:929–949

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li CL (1996) New taxa in Vitaceae from China. Chin J Appl Environ Biol 2:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckey D (1979) The distribution of secondary compounds within plants. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 56–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness JH (2003) Catalpa bignonioides alters extrafloral nectar production after herbivory and attracts ant bodyguards. Oecologia 134:210–218

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pulice CE, Packer AA (2008) Simulated herbivory induces extrafloral nectary production in Prunus avium. Funct Ecol 22:801–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupp MJ, Denno RF (1983) Leaf age as a predictor of herbivore distribution and abundance. In: Denno RF, Mcclure MS (eds) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 91–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades DF (1979) Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 4–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero GQ, Izzo TJ (2004) Leaf damage induces ant recruitment in the Amazonian ant-plant Hirtella myrmecophila. J Trop Ecol 20:675–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosumek FB, Silveira FAO, Neves FD, Barbosa NPD, Diniz L, Oki Y, Pezzini F, Fernandes GW, Cornelissen T (2009) Ants on plants: a meta-analysis of the role of ants as plant biotic defenses. Oecologia 160:537–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith LL, Lanza J, Smith GC (1990) Amino-acid-concentrations in extrafloral nectar of impatiens-sultani increase after simulated herbivory. Ecology 71:107–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wäckers FL, Bonifay C (2004) How to be sweet? Extrafloral nectar allocation by Gossypium hirsutum fits optimal defense theory predictions. Ecology 85:1512–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wäckers FL, Wunderlin R (1999) Induction of cotton extrafloral nectar production in response to herbivory does not require a herbivore-specific elicitor. Entomol Exp Appl 91:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wäckers FL, Zuber D, Wunderlin R, Keller F (2001) The effect of herbivory on temporal and spatial dynamics of foliar nectar production in cotton and castor. Ann Bot 87:365–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the numerous contributions in field work of local Dai people Mr. Gong Ai and Mr. Kanjian Ai. We also thank Prof. Qing-Jun Li of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG), the Chinese Academy of Sciences who provided the devices used in the field for EFNs measurements and gave some suggestions. Ms. Han Lai helped to collect the leaf material in the field for tannin analysis, and the Naban River Watershed National Natural Reserve (NRWNNR) provided the permission for field studies. Two anonymous referees contributed many valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. International cooperation project (2007DFA91660) of the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of China partly funded this study. We also express our appreciations to all of them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling-Zeng Meng.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Neal Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meng, LZ., Martin, K., Liu, JX. et al. Young leaf protection in the shrub Leea glabra in south-west China: the role of extrafloral nectaries and ants. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 6, 59–65 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-011-9151-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-011-9151-6

Keywords

Navigation