Skip to main content
Log in

Visual search and the importance of time in complex decision making by bees

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Psychophysicists studying decision making in animals have overwhelmingly focused on choice accuracy, not speed. Results from human visual search, however, show that there might be a tight link between the two. Here we review both visual-sensory and cognitive mechanisms that affect decision speed in flower visiting bees. We show that decision times are affected by contrast of targets and background, by similarity between targets and distractors, numbers of distractors present in a scene, illuminating light intensity, presence or absence of punishment, and complexity of tasks. We explore between-individual and within-individual speed-accuracy tradeoffs, and show that bees resort to highly dynamic strategies when solving visual search tasks. Where possible, we attempt to link the observed search behaviour to the temporal and spatial properties of neuronal circuits underlying visual object detection. We demonstrate that natural foraging speed may not only be limited by factors such as food item density, flight energetics and scramble competition, as often implied. Our results show that understanding the behavioural ecology of foraging can substantially gain from knowledge about mechanisms of visual information processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Autrum HJ, Stoecker M (1950) Die Verschmelzungsfrequenzen des Bienenauges. Zeitschrift fuer Naturforschung 5:38–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisvert MJ, Sherry DF (2006) Interval timing by an invertebrate, the bumble bee Bombus impatiens. Curr Biol 16:1636–1640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe AD, Chittka L (2001) The evolution of color vision in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:471–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burns JG (2005) Impulsive bees forage better: the advantage of quick, sometimes inaccurate foraging decisions. Anim Behav 70:e1–e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Beier W, Hertel H, Steinmann E, Menzel R (1992) Opponent colour coding is a universal strategy to evaluate the photoreceptor inputs in hymenoptera. J Comp Physiol A 170:545–563

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Brockmann A (2005) Perception space, the final frontier. PLoS Biol 3:545–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Dyer AG, Bock F, Dornhaus A (2003) Bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy. Nature 424:388

    Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Shmida A, Troje N, Menzel R (1994) Ultraviolet as a component of flower reflections, and the colour perception of hymenoptera. Vision Res 34:1489–1508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Thomson JD (1997) Sensori-motor learning and its relevance for task specialization in bumble bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Thomson JD, Waser NM (1999) Flower constancy, insect psychology, and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86:361–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS, Fry SN, Wehner R (1993) Sequence learning by honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 172:693–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Desimone R (1998) Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philos Trans Royal Soc B 353:1245–1255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Downing CJ, Pinker S (1985) The spatial structure of visual attention. In: Posner MJ, Martin OSM (eds) Attention and performance, vol 11. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, pp 171–187

  • Dyer AG, Chittka L (2004a) Bumblebee search time without ultraviolet light. J Exp Biol 207:1683–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer AG, Chittka L (2004b) Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) sacrifice foraging speed to solve difficult colour discrimination tasks. J Comp Physiol A 190:759–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer A, Neumeyer C, Chittka L (2005) Honeybee (Apis mellifera) vision can discriminate between and recognise images of human faces. J Exp Biol 208:4709–4714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M (2003) The amazing mini-brain: lessons from the honeybee. Bee World 84:5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Lehrer M (2001) Honeybee vision and floral displays: from detection to close-up recognition. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD (eds) Cognitive ecology of pollination. University Press, Cambridge, pp 61–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould JL (1985) How bees remember flower shapes. Science 227:1492–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horridge A (2000) Seven experiments on pattern vision of the honeybee, with a model. Vision Res 40:2589–2603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jander U, Jander R (2002) Allometry and resolution of bee eyes (Apoidea). Arthropod Struct Develop 30:179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp DJ (2002) Visual mate-searching behaviour in the evening brown butterfly, Melanitis leda (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Austr J Entomol 41:300–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld K (1994) Tracking of small objects in front of a textured background by insects and vertebrates: Phenomena and neuronal basis. Biol Cybernet 70:407–415

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Land MF (1999) Compound eye structure: matching eye to environment. In: Archer SNEA (ed) Adaptive mechanisms in the ecology of vision. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 51–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin SB (1989) The role of sensory adaptation in the retina. J Exp Biol 146:39–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lotto RB, Chittka L (2005) Seeing the light: Illumination as a contextual cue to color choice behavior in bumblebees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3852–3856

    Google Scholar 

  • McElree B, Carrasco M (1999) The temporal dynamics of visual search: Evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 25:1517–1539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R (2001) Behavioral and neural mechanisms of learning and memory as determinants of flower constancy. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD (eds) Cognitive ecology of pollination. University Press, Cambridge, pp 21–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama K, Silverman GH (1986) Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature 320:264–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peitsch D, Fietz A, Hertel H, de Souza J, Ventura DF, Menzel R (1992) The spectral input systems of hymenopteran insects and their receptor-based colour vision. J Comp Physiol A 170:23–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raine NE, Ings TC, Dornhaus A, Saleh N, Chittka L (2006) Adaptation, chance, and history in the evolution of bee foraging behavior. Adv Study Behav 36:305–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleh N, Ohashi K, Thomson JD, Chittka L (2006) Facultative use of repellent scent marking in foraging bumblebees: complex versus simple flowers. Anim Behav 71:847–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skorupski P, Chittka L (2006) Animal cognition: an insect’s sense of time? Curr Biol 16:R851–R853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spaethe J, Chittka L (2003) Interindividual variation of eye optics and single object resolution in bumblebees. J Exp Biol 206:3447–3453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spaethe J, Tautz J, Chittka L (2001) Visual constraints in foraging bumblebees: flower size and color affect search time and flight behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 3898–3903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spaethe J, Tautz J, Chittka L (2006) Do honeybees detect colour targets using serial or parallel visual search? J Exp Biol 209:987–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MV, Lehrer M (1984) Temporal acuity of honeybee vision: behavioural studies using moving stimuli. J Comp Physiol A 155:297–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Rolfe B (1993) Pattern vision in insects: “Cortical” Processing? Nature 362:539–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treismann A, Gormican S (1988) Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychol Rev 95:15–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorobyev M, Brandt R, Peitsch D, Laughlin SB, Menzel R (2001) Colour thresholds and receptor noise: behaviour and physiology compared. Vision Res 41:639–653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warrant EJ, McIntyre PD (1993) Arthropod eye design and the physical limits to spatial resolving power. Progr Neurobiol 40:413–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson SJ, Cummins HZ (1983) Light and color in nature and art. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe JM (1999) How do you pay attention? Nature 400:813–815

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe J (2000) Visual attention. In: DeValois KK (ed) Seeing. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenger B, Fahle M (1997) Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: a model for error rates in visual search. J Exp Psychol 23:1783–1791

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Chittka.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Heikki Hokkanen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chittka, L., Spaethe, J. Visual search and the importance of time in complex decision making by bees. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 1, 37–44 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-007-9001-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-007-9001-8

Keywords

Navigation