Skip to main content
Log in

Topology optimization of shear wall structures under seismic loading

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A topology optimization formulation is developed to find the stiffest structure with desirable material distribution subjected to seismic loads. Finite element models of the structures are generated and the optimality criteria method is modified using a simple penalty approach and introducing fictitious strain energy to simultaneously consider both material volume and displacement constraints. Different types of shear walls with/without opening are investigated. Additionally, the effects of shear wall-frame interaction for single and coupled shear walls are studied. Gravity and seismic loads are applied to the shear walls so that the definitions provide a practical approach for locating the critical parts of these structures. The results suggest new viewpoints for architectural and structural engineering for placement of openings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASCE7-10 (2013), ASCE 7-10, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beghini LL, Beghini A, Katz N, Baker WF and Paulino GH (2014), “Connecting Architecture and Engineering Through Structural Topology Optimization,” Engineering Structures, 59: 716–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsoe MP and Sigmund O (2004), Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods, and Applications, Springer Science & Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruggi M, Milani G and Taliercio A (2014), “Simple Topology Optimization Strategy for the FRP Reinforcement of Masonry Walls in Two-Way Bending,” Computers & Structures, 138: 86–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen PW and Klarbring A (2009), An Introduction to Structural Optimization, Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao X and Ma H (2015), “Topology Optimization of Continuum Structures under Buckling Constraints,” Computers & Structures, 157: 142–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goo S, Wang S, Hyun J and Jung J (2016), “Topology Optimization of Thin Plate Structures with Bending Stress Constraints,” Computers & Structures, 175: 134–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajirasouliha I, Pilakoutas K and Moghaddam H (2011), “Topology Optimization for the Seismic Design of Truss-Like Structures,” Computers & Structures, 89(7–8): 702–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassani B and Hinton E (1998), “A Review of Homogenization and Topology Optimization III—Topology Optimization Using Optimality Criteria,” Computers & Structures, 69(6): 739–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakiela MJ, Chapman C, Duda J, Adewuya A and Saitou K (2000), “Continuum Structural Topology Design with Genetic Algorithms,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 186(2–4): 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A, Aghakouchak AA and Zakian P (2015), “Reduced Record Method for Efficient Time History Dynamic Analysis and Optimal Design,” Earthquakes and Structures, 8(3): 639–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A, Hassani B, Shojaee S and Tavakkoli SM (2008), “Structural Topology Optimization Using Ant Colony Methodology,” Engineering Structures, 30(9): 2559–2565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A and Zakian P (2013), “Optimal Design of Steel Frames under Seismic Loading Using Two Meta-Heuristic Algorithms,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 82: 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A and Zakian P (2014a), “Optimal Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall-Frame Structures,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 18(7): 2181–2190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A and Zakian P (2014b), “Seismic Design Optimisation of RC Moment Frames and Dual Shear Wall-Frame Structures via CSS Algorithm,” Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 15(3): 435–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J and Ma Y (2016), “A Survey of Manufacturing Oriented Topology Optimization Methods,” Advances in Engineering Software, 100: 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luh G-C and Lin C-Y (2009), “Structural Topology Optimization Using Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm,” Applied Soft Computing, 9(4): 1343–1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller O, Foschi RO, Ascheri JP, Rubinstein M and Grossman S (2015), “Optimization for Performance-Based Design under Seismic Demands, Including Social Costs,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 14(2): 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi SA and Ghorbani-Tanha AK (2012), “Optimum Placement and Characteristics of Velocity-Dependent Dampers under Seismic Excitation,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 11(3): 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noilublao N and Bureerat S (2011), “Simultaneous Topology, Shape and Sizing Optimisation of a Three-Dimensional Slender Truss Tower Using Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms,” Computers & Structures, 89(23–24): 2531–2538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahami H, Kaveh A and Gholipour Y (2008), “Sizing, Geometry and Topology Optimization of Trusses via Force Method and Genetic Algorithm,” Engineering Structures, 30(9): 2360–2369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozvany GIN (2009), “A Critical Review of Established Methods of Structural Topology Optimization,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 37(3): 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salajegheh E, Gholizadeh S and Khatibinia M (2008), “Optimal Design of Structures for Earthquake Loads by a Hybrid RBF-BPSO Method,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 7(1): 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund O (2007), “Morphology-Based Black and White Filters for Topology Optimization,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 33(4): 401–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund O (2011), “On the Usefulness of Non-Gradient Approaches in Topology Optimization,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 43(5): 589–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund O and Maute K (2013), “Topology Optimization Approaches,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 48(6): 1031–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg LL, Beghini A, Baker WF and Paulino GH (2012), “Topology Optimization for Braced Frames: Combining Continuum and Beam/Column Elements,” Engineering Structures, 37: 106–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wight JK and MacGregor JG (2012), Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y and Ma H (2014), “Optimal Topology Design of Replaceable Bar Dampers of a Reticulated Shell Based on Sensitivity Analysis,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 13(1): 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakian P (2019), “Meta-Heuristic Design Optimization of Steel Moment Resisting Frames Subjected to Natural Frequency Constraints,” Advances in Engineering Software, 135: 102686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakian P, Kaveh A (2018), “Economic Dispatch of Power Systems Using an Adaptive Charged System Search Algorithm,” Applied Soft Computing, 73: 607–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo ZH, Xie YM and Huang X (2012), “Evolutionary Topology Optimization of Structures with Multiple Displacement and Frequency Constraints,” Advances in Structural Engineering, 15(2): 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pooya Zakian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zakian, P., Kaveh, A. Topology optimization of shear wall structures under seismic loading. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 19, 105–116 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-020-0550-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-020-0550-5

Keywords

Navigation