Abstract
It is critical to ensure the functionality of highway bridges after earthquakes to provide access to important facilities. Since the 1971 San Fernando earthquake, there has been a better understanding of the seismic performance of bridges. Nonetheless, there are no detailed guidelines addressing the performance of skewed highway bridges. Several parameters affect the response of skewed highway bridges under both service and seismic loads which makes their behavior complex. Therefore, there is a need for more research to study the effect of skew angle and other related factors on the performance of highway bridges. This paper examines the seismic performance of a three-span continuous concrete box girder bridge with skew angles from 0 to 60 degrees, analytically. Finite element (FE) and simplified beam-stick (BS) models of the bridge were developed using SAP2000. Different types of analysis were considered on both models such as: nonlinear static pushover, and linear and nonlinear time history analyses. A comparison was conducted between FE and BS, different skew angles, abutment support conditions, and time history and pushover analysis. It is shown that the BS model has the capability to capture the coupling due to skew and the significant modes for moderate skew angles. Boundary conditions and pushover load profile are determined to have a major effect on pushover analysis. Pushover analysis may be used to predict the maximum deformation and hinge formation adequately.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (1998), LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 2nd Edition, Washington D.C.
Bentz EC and Collins MP (2000), Response-2000, Version 1.0.5, University of Toronto, Canada.
Bjornsson S, Stanton J and Eberhard M (1997), “Seismic Response of Skew Bridges,” 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp.1–12.
Computers and Structures, Inc. (2005), SAP2000, Version 10.0.5, Integrated Structural Analysis and Design Software, Berkeley, CA.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (1996), “Seismic Design of Bridges, Design Example No. 4 — Three-span Continuous CIP Concrete Bridge,” Publication No. FHWA-SA-97-009, October 1996.
Ghobarah AA and Tso, WK (1974), “Seismic Analysis of Skewed Highway Bridges with Intermediate Supports,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2: 235–248.
Maleki S (2002), “Deck Modeling for Seismic Analysis of Skewed Slab-girder Bridges,” Engineering Structures, 24: 1315–1326.
Maragakis E (1984), “A Model for the Rigid Body Motions of Skew Bridges,” Doctoral Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
Megally SH, Silva PF and Seible F (2002), “Seismic Response of Sacrificial Shear Keys in Bridge Abutments,” Report No. SSRP-2001/23, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego.
Meng, JY and Lui EM (2000), “Seismic Analysis and Assessment of a Skew Highway Bridge,” Engineering Structures, 22: 1433–1452.
PEER Strong Motion Database (2000), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
Saiidi M and Orie D (1992), “Earthquake Design Forces in Regular Highway Bridges,” Computers & Structures, 44(5): 1047–1054.
Wakefield RR, Nazmy AS and Billington DP (1991), “Analysis of Seismic Failure in Skew RC Bridge,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 117(3): 972–986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by: In part by the California Department of Transportation Under Caltrans Contract No. 59A0503, and the Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering (UNR)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abdel-Mohti, A., Pekcan, G. Seismic response of skewed RC box-girder bridges. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 7, 415–426 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-1007-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-1007-4